| Literature DB >> 34240048 |
Kia Dashtipour1, William Taylor1, Shuja Ansari1, Mandar Gogate2, Adnan Zahid1, Yusuf Sambo1, Amir Hussain2, Qammer H Abbasi1,3, Muhammad Ali Imran1,4.
Abstract
With the advancement of social media networks, there are lots of unlabeled reviews available online, therefore it is necessarily to develop automatic tools to classify these types of reviews. To utilize these reviews for user perception, there is a need for automated tools that can process online user data. In this paper, a sentiment analysis framework has been proposed to identify people's perception towards mobile networks. The proposed framework consists of three basic steps: preprocessing, feature selection, and applying different machine learning algorithms. The performance of the framework has taken into account different feature combinations. The simulation results show that the best performance is by integrating unigram, bigram, and trigram features.Entities:
Keywords: 5G; machine learning; mobile network quality; opinion mining; sentiment analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34240048 PMCID: PMC8259739 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2021.640868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Big Data ISSN: 2624-909X
FIGURE 1Proposed framework for sentiment analysis for people’s perception of the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
Next generation mobile network (5G).
| Keywords |
|---|
| 5G |
| Next generation mobile network |
| Fifth generation of technology |
| 5G devices |
Parameters of ML algorithms.
| Algorithm | Parameter | Time |
|---|---|---|
| SVM | RBF kernel | 4 min and 21 s |
| Naive Bayes | Sample weight = none | 2 min and 12 s |
| MLP | Activation = relu | 3 min and 31 s |
| Logistic regression | Penalty = l2 | 3 min and 42 s |
Results of N-gram features.
| Feature | Classifier | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uni | MLP | 85.92 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Uni | LR | 86.14 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Uni | Linear SVM | 84.79 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
| Uni | RBF SVM | 62.61 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
| Uni | NB | 86.48 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| Bi | MLP | 79.16 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| Bi | LR | 78.37 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Bi | Linear SVM | 73.98 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| Bi | RBF SVM | 62.61 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
| Bi | NB | 78.82 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| Tri | MLP | 73.42 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| Tri | LR | 72.52 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| Tri | Linear SVM | 69.48 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| Tri | RBF SVM | 62.61 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
| Tri | NB | 71.39 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
Comparison of combination of N-gram features.
| Feature | Classifier | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uni + Bi | MLP | 86.71 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| Uni + Bi | LR | 86.14 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Uni + Bi | Linear SVM | 85.92 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Uni + Bi | RBF SVM | 62.61 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
| Uni + Bi | NB | 85.81 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Uni + Tri | MLP | 85.13 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| Uni + Tri | LR | 86.59 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| Uni + Tri | Linear SVM | 86.48 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| Uni + Tri | RBF SVM | 62.61 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
| Uni + Tri | NB | 85.47 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| Bi + Tri | MLP | 76.91 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| Bi + Tri | LR | 77.02 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| Bi + Tri | Linear SVM | 77.02 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| Bi + Tri | RBF SVM | 62.01 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.6 |
| Bi + Tri | NB | 71.28 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
FIGURE 2Positive trends towards the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
FIGURE 3Negative trends towards the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
FIGURE 4Trend of United Kingdom towards the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
FIGURE 5Most discussed trends for the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
FIGURE 6Occupation of Twitter users most positive towards the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
FIGURE 7Occupation for Twitter users most negative towards the fifth generation of cellular networks (5G).
Most frequent positive bigrams for next generation mobile network (5G).
| Positive bigram | Negative bigram |
|---|---|
| 5G cheap | Low performance |
| Good coverage | Awful services |
| Good supply | Blow Huawei |
| Great performance | Hate 5G |
| High security | Low speed |
| Fast speed | Low coverage |
| Great system | Low frequency |
| Communication networks | 5G crap |
| Nokia performs | Slow 5G |
| Creat satisfaction | Expensive technology |
Most frequent positive trigrams for next generation mobile network (5G).
| Positive trigram | Negative trigram |
|---|---|
| Cheap 5G phones | Slow coverage 5G |
| Good coverage phone | Low suppliers services |
| Cest 5G phones | Blow Huawei China |
| Good Supply 5G | 5G slow connection |
| Great areas coverage | 5G low frequency |
| Good test zones | About 5G dangers |
| 5G fast speed | Low frequency 5G |
| 5G good communication | New 5G crap |
| Great 5G signal | Expect 5G slow |
| Nokia performs well | Expensive new technology |
Examples of positive and negative tweets towards the next generation mobile network (5G).
| Positive | Negative |
|---|---|
| Currently, the 5G phones are the best that you can buy right now | With 5G as dangerous to our health |
| 5G has great performance | 5G will be our deaths cancer rates will skyrocket |
| I gotta say, the vivo nex 3 5G has a pretty great DAC | 5G is horrific, it causes cancer, it’s already banned in some countries |
| The global economic potential of 5G is staggering. It is predicted to add up to 3 million new jobs and create $500 billion | It’s not good enough, the 5G privacy |
| I Had good experience with 5G | 5G is no good for human health |