BACKGROUND: The object of this study was to examine return to golf and changes in golf performance after shoulder arthroplasty. Additionally, we set out to determine if there were differences in return to play and performance between total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We also examined pain during the golf swing to determine if there is a change in pain level after surgery. METHODS: Patients were identified using a Current Procedural Terminology code 23472 search for TSA. A 19-question online survey was sent out to each patient with questions detailing golfing performance and pain during the swing before and after surgery. Comparisons were made to determine differences in pain, performance and enjoyment between TSA and RTSA groups before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 586 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were sent the online survey via email. Of those patients, 33 identified themselves as golfers and who responded to the survey, resulting in an overall response rate of 5.6%. Twenty-three of 31 (74%) patients were able to return to golf following their procedure. Overall, the respondents who reported pain associated with golfing activity had significantly decreased pain after undergoing either TSA or RTSA. The RTSA group had a significant drop in driving distance following the procedure and this was significantly lower than the postoperative driving distance in the TSA group, despite an insignificant preoperative difference. CONCLUSION: Overall, TSA offers a safe and effective means for reducing pain during the golf swing in patients suffering from advanced shoulder osteoarthritis. While there were no significant changes in performance following TSA, individuals undergoing RTSA can be counseled that they are at risk for lower driving distances due to altered mechanics. Overall, patients were satisfied with their procedure and their ability to return to the golf course.
BACKGROUND: The object of this study was to examine return to golf and changes in golf performance after shoulder arthroplasty. Additionally, we set out to determine if there were differences in return to play and performance between total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We also examined pain during the golf swing to determine if there is a change in pain level after surgery. METHODS: Patients were identified using a Current Procedural Terminology code 23472 search for TSA. A 19-question online survey was sent out to each patient with questions detailing golfing performance and pain during the swing before and after surgery. Comparisons were made to determine differences in pain, performance and enjoyment between TSA and RTSA groups before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 586 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were sent the online survey via email. Of those patients, 33 identified themselves as golfers and who responded to the survey, resulting in an overall response rate of 5.6%. Twenty-three of 31 (74%) patients were able to return to golf following their procedure. Overall, the respondents who reported pain associated with golfing activity had significantly decreased pain after undergoing either TSA or RTSA. The RTSA group had a significant drop in driving distance following the procedure and this was significantly lower than the postoperative driving distance in the TSA group, despite an insignificant preoperative difference. CONCLUSION: Overall, TSA offers a safe and effective means for reducing pain during the golf swing in patients suffering from advanced shoulder osteoarthritis. While there were no significant changes in performance following TSA, individuals undergoing RTSA can be counseled that they are at risk for lower driving distances due to altered mechanics. Overall, patients were satisfied with their procedure and their ability to return to the golf course.
Entities:
Keywords:
Golf; Return to sport; Shoulder replacement arthroplasty
Authors: Ian K Y Lo; Robert B Litchfield; Sharon Griffin; Ken Faber; Stuart D Patterson; Alexandra Kirkley Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Leslie A Fink Barnes; W Jeffrey Grantham; Molly C Meadows; Louis U Bigliani; William N Levine; Christopher S Ahmad Journal: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) Date: 2015-02
Authors: Molly T Vogt; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris; Michael C Nevitt; James D Kang; Susan M Rubin; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman Journal: Spine J Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.166