Literature DB >> 34238972

Exosomal hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 may serve as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for sepsis.

Chang Tian1, Jiaying Liu1, Xin Di1, Shan Cong1, Min Zhao1, Ke Wang2.   

Abstract

In order to explore the role of exosomal circRNAs in the occurrence and development of sepsis, we looked for potential diagnostic markers to accurately identify sepsis and to lay a molecular basis for precise treatment. Ultracentrifugation was used to extract exosomes from the serum of patients with sepsis and healthy individuals. Then, changes in circRNA expression in exosomes were studied by circRNA microarray analysis. Gene ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto City Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were used to annotate the biological functions and pathways of genes, and a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was constructed. In the microarray analysis, 132 circRNAs were significantly differentially expressed, including 80 and 52 that were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. RT-qPCR verified the results of microarray analysis: hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 were upregulated in sepsis serum exosomes. ROC analysis showed that hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in serum exosomes have the potential to be used as diagnostic markers for sepsis. The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network predicted the potential regulatory pathways of differentially expressed circRNAs. There are differences in the expression of circRNA in serum exosomes between patients with sepsis and healthy individuals, which may be involved in the occurrence and development of the disease. Among them, elevations in hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 could be used as novel diagnostic biomarkers and molecular therapeutic targets.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34238972      PMCID: PMC8266806          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93246-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction and is not a specific disease, but rather a syndrome of physiological, pathological, and biochemical abnormalities caused by the host's unregulated response to infection[1]. Sepsis is a heterogeneous disease state that progresses rapidly, and its early diagnosis and intervention can significantly improve prognosis[2]. Our diagnosis of sepsis mainly relies on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system, which has certain limitations; currently, there is no ‘gold standard’ for laboratory diagnosis. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, genomics and metabolomics analyses have found that the levels of various genes and metabolites in sepsis have changed, and that the changes occur earlier than clinical symptoms[3,4]. Identifying these molecular changes in sepsis is highly valuable for understanding the course of the disease, and for predicting prognosis and response to treatment. Exploring the changes in sepsis at cellular and molecular levels is helpful to explore the nature of its pathogenesis and may help to identify the causes of heterogeneity in the body's response[5]. Individualised therapy targeting the core molecules of the disease can improve the efficiency of the treatment and reduce toxicity. Therefore, these differentially expressed molecules may serve as diagnostic markers for sepsis and may become targets for molecular targeted therapy. Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles derived from the endosomal system, ranging from 40 to 160 nm (about 100 nm on average) in diameter[6]. In sepsis, exosomes are secreted by a variety of cells (including mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages, among others), and act on recipient cells (e.g., cardiomyocytes, macrophages, vascular endothelial cells) to promote inflammation, inhibit inflammation, or regulate immunity[7-9]. Their contents are rich and diverse, containing a variety of proteins, DNA, RNA (e.g., mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, circRNA), amino acids, and metabolites[6]. The uptake of cytoplasmic components during exosomal biogenesis is not random, but is a highly regulated and selective process, which is very important for disease identification and diagnosis[10]. The cell-free RNA in the blood is easily inactivated by endogenous RNase, while RNA encapsulated in exosomes can be prevented from degradation by RNase and can exist stably[11]. In addition, the exosomes released to the outside of cells exist in a variety of body fluids and are easy to separate and extract[11,12]. These characteristics give exosomes diagnostic and therapeutic potential. CircRNA is a large class of non-coding RNAs produced by reverse splicing events[13]. CircRNAs are produced in the nucleus and are then transported to the cytoplasm. They have the characteristics of tissue specificity, cell specificity, high stability, and species conservation[14]. Some can be distributed to exosomes, where they are enriched and stably exist[15,16]. In disease states, the expression level of exosome circRNA changes, and it plays a regulatory role in cell proliferation, tumour metastasis, and drug resistance, among other processes[17]. CircRNAs are involved in the occurrence and progression of various diseases through multiple mechanisms. For example, circRNAs act as miRNA sponges to regulate gene expression and participate in the occurrence and development of tumours[13]; they also act as a protein sponge to mediate the immune response during viral infection[18]. Numerous studies have shown that the expression of exosomal circRNAs is different between patients and healthy people, and its detection can help to identify patients. Therefore, exosomal circRNAs may be used as novel disease diagnostic markers[19]. To date, there have been no reports on the expression or role of exosomal circRNAs in sepsis. This study aimed to detect circRNAs in serum exosomes of patients with sepsis and to explore their value in the diagnosis of sepsis and in molecular targeted therapy.

Materials and methods

Patient samples and ethics statement

In this study, a total of 25 patients with sepsis who underwent treatment at the Second Hospital of Jilin University from September 2018 to January 2019 were included, in addition to 22 healthy individuals. Sepsis was defined according to the Sepsis-3 criteria[1]. All study participant’s peripheral blood samples (4–5 mL) were collected in the early phase (within 24 h) of the diagnosis of sepsis and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to obtain the serum, which was stored at − 80 °C after being labelled. The patients’ clinical and laboratory data are shown in Table 1. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant named guidelines and regulations. All participants signed an informed consent form.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of septic patients.

CharacteristicsSeptic patients (N = 22)
Sex
Male, n (%)16 (73)
Female, n (%)6 (27)
Age, years56.73 ± 16.12
Mortality, n (%)8 (36)
Comorbidities
Hypertension, n (%)10 (45)
Diabetes, n (%)7 (32)
Source of sepsis
Abdominal, n (%)3 (14)
Lung, n (%)19 (86)
Mean arterial pressure, mmHg91.509 ± 10.6399
PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)200.535 ± 78.7067
Use of mechanical ventilation, n (%)5 (23)
Hematologic and inflammatory data
Leukocyte, 109/L11.20 (8.75–14.05)
Neutrophils, 109/L9.60 (6.60–11.59)
Hemoglobin, g/dL115.091 ± 21.5338
Platelets, 109/L128.282 ± 82.8287
Procalcitonin, ng/mL7.69 (2.20–24.31)
SOFA score6.273 ± 2.9469
Positive blood culture5 (23)

Data are expressed as number (%), mean ± SD, or median (25th–75th percentile).

Demographic characteristics of septic patients. Data are expressed as number (%), mean ± SD, or median (25th–75th percentile).

Exosome collection

We used ultracentrifugation to extract exosomes from the serum, and the whole process was completed at 4 °C. First, the serum was centrifuged at 2000 × g for 30 min to remove dead cells and was then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min to remove cell debris and impurities. Then, the exosomes were preliminarily precipitated by centrifugation at 110,000 × g for 80 min. Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution was added to wash the soluble protein impurities, and then the sample was centrifuged again at 110,000 × g for 80 min to obtain pure exosomes. Finally, the pellet was resuspended in PBS solution (100μL PBS solution per 1 mL of serum) and was stored in a − 80 °C freezer.

Western blotting analysis

Exosomal marker proteins were detected by immunoblotting. Protein was extracted from the same volume of exosomes, and the protein concentration of exosomes was quantified using the BCA method (Beyotime, China). Then, 20 μg of exosomal protein was separated by electrophoresis on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and was then transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA). Immunoblotting was performed with anti-CD63 and anti-TSG101 antibodies (Affinity, USA) at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were then detected with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (#SA00001-1 or #SA00001-2; Proteintech Group, USA). Finally, the ECL chemiluminescence agent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to display protein bands, and the results were recorded with photos.

Electron microscopy

For electron microscopy, 5 μl of the exosome suspension was spotted on copper mesh and dried at room temperature. The sample was then negatively stained with 5 μl of 2% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid solution. The morphology of exosomes was observed at 80 kV under a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400, JEOL, Japan), and the results were photographed.

RNA extraction and quality control

Total RNA was extracted from the exosome suspension using the TRI Reagent BD (Molecular Research Center, Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The total RNA from each exosome sample was quantified and its purity was evaluated using a NanoDrop 2000 ultra-micro spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

circRNA microarray analysis

CircRNA microarray analysis was performed on serum exosomes from three people with sepsis and three healthy persons. According to the manufacturer's protocol (Arraystar Inc., USA), sample labelling and microarray hybridization were performed. First, RNA was fluorescently labelled. Rnase R reagent (Epicenter, Inc., USA) was used to digest total RNA to remove linear RNA and enrich circRNAs. The enriched circRNAs were then transcribed into fluorescently labelled cRNA using a random priming method (Arraystar Super RNA Labelling Kit; Arraystar, USA). The labelled cRNAs were purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Microarray hybridisation was then performed in an Agilent Hybridisation oven. The fluorescently labelled cRNAs were cleaved into fragments and were then hybridised on the circRNA expression microarray slide. After hybridisation was completed, the hybridised microarrays were washed, fixed, and scanned using the Agilent Scanner G2505C. Agilent Feature Extraction software was used to extract raw data from the scanned images. Quantile normalisation of raw data was performed using the limma package (version 3.48.0)[20] in R, and the circRNAs labelled by the software were retained for subsequent difference analysis. A t-test was used to estimate the statistical significance of the difference. Fold changes and p-values were used to screen for significant differences in the expression of circRNAs between the two groups of samples. Volcano plots and heat maps were used to display differentially expressed circRNAs.

real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis

Total RNA was extracted from serum exosomes of 25 sepsis patients and 22 controls. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to verify the experiment. The sequences of the primers used in the experiment are shown in Table 2. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time quantitative PCR reactions were then carried out with a real-time PCR system (LightCycler480, Roche, Switzerland) using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Japan). The PCR conditions were 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 60 s. β-actin was used as a reference gene, and all qPCR reactions were repeated three times. The 2-△△CT value reflects the relative expression level of circRNAs.
Table 2

Primers designed for qRT-PCR analysis of circRNAs.

Target IDPrimer sequence, 5’–3’Tm (°C)Product size in bp
β-actin (human)F:5' GTGGCCGAGGACTTTGATTG3'6073
R:5' CCTGTAACAACGCATCTCATATT3’
hsa_circRNA_104484F:5’ TGTATTCTCTCTGTGTGTGGCTG 3’60134
R:5’ GCAACATCCCAAATCGGTCT 3’
hsa_circRNA_104670F:5’ CGCAGAAGCGTTGTCACTG 3’60110
R:5’ CTTCCCCGTGTTCTTCCTGTT 3’
hsa_circRNA_101491F:5’ AGGCTTTTGGACAAGTGGGTG 3’6083
R:5’TGAGGATGTGGTGCTGTTTGTG3’
hsa_circRNA_406194F:5’ ACAATGATGAGGCCTTAGAAGC 3’6058
R:5’ CGATGGCATTCACCCTCTT 3’
hsa_circRNA_103864F:5’ GGATGTATGGTGTAGGTGTGGA 3’6090
R:5’CAAGACTATTATCCTTTATTATAACCC3’
Primers designed for qRT-PCR analysis of circRNAs.

Functional analysis

Arraystar microRNA prediction software was used to predict miRNAs downstream of differentially expressed circRNAs. Then, the interactions between circRNA-microRNAs are explained in detail. TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/), miRDB (http://www.mirdb.org/), and miRTarBase (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/php/index.php) were used to predict the potential targets of miRNAs. The common genes in the three databases were collected using Venn diagrams. The circRNA–miRNA–mRNA regulatory map was visualised using Cytoscape 3.8.0. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was used to annotate the biological functions of genes in the ceRNA network, including molecular functions (MF), biological pathways (BP), and cellular components (CC). Kyoto City Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Enrichment Analysis was used to evaluate the biological pathways of genes[21]. The enrichment of MF, BP, CC, and pathways of genes were annotated with DAVID 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) which is an online biological tool.

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (version 23.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. If the data of continuous variables were distributed normally, the data were analysed using t-tests; results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. If data were non-normal, the Mann–Whitney U test was used, and the data are expressed in percentile form. Data of categorical variables between groups were tested using the Chi-square test. A p value of < 0.05 means that the difference is statistically significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of exosomal circRNAs for sepsis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of circRNA. The Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity (Youden Index = Sensitivity + Specificity-1). The highest Youden index corresponds to the optimal cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the second hospital of Jilin University. All participants were informed and willing to sign informed consent.

Consent for publication

All the authors read and consented to the publication of the manuscript.

Results

Characterization of circulating serum exosomes

The serum exosome was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and WB for CD63 or TSG101 (Fig. 1a). The exosomes are round or oval ‘cup-shaped’, with a diameter in the range of 40–160 nm. CD63 and TSG101 showed positive expression in WB (Fig. 1b).
Figure 1

(a) Electron micrographs and (b) WB results of serum exosomes.

(a) Electron micrographs and (b) WB results of serum exosomes.

Identification of differentially expressed circRNAs

We used circRNA microarray technology to detect changes in the circRNA expression profile of serum exosomes in sepsis. After scanning the fluorescent signal of circRNA microarray hybridisation, a total of six scanning pictures of the sepsis and control groups were obtained (Fig. 2a). The box plot shows the results of the quality control analysis of the microarray data (Fig. 2b). Volcano plots and scatter plots were used to visually show the differences in circRNA expression between the two groups. In the volcano map (Fig. 2c), the vertical lines represent 1.5 times up and down, and the horizontal lines represent p ≤ 0.05. Red dots indicate circRNAs that are significantly differently expressed, and grey dots indicate circRNAs that are not significantly differently expressed. In the scatter plot (Fig. 2d), the X-axis and Y-axis represent the normalised signal values of the two groups of samples, respectively, and the green line is the fold line. Plots distributed above the upper green line and below the lower green line represent significantly differently expressed circRNAs.
Figure 2

(a) The probe fluorescence signal displayed in each microarray scanning picture was uniform and clear. (A, B, C: sepsis group, a, b, c: control group). (b) Box plot: The abscissa represents each sample, and the ordinate represents the normalized intensity value. The expression of circRNAs in each sample was almost the same after normalization. (c) Volcano map: Differentially expressed circRNAs between sepsis and healthy human serum exosomes. (d) Scatter plot: Changes of circRNAs expression levels between sepsis and healthy human serum exosomes. (e) Cluster analysis: the distinguishable circRNA expression profile between sepsis and healthy human serum exosomes. The quantile normalisation and difference analysis were performed using limma package (version 3.48.0) in R. The Volcano map and Scatter plot were performed using python (version 2.7). Cluster analysis was performed using gplots package (version 3.1.1) in R.

(a) The probe fluorescence signal displayed in each microarray scanning picture was uniform and clear. (A, B, C: sepsis group, a, b, c: control group). (b) Box plot: The abscissa represents each sample, and the ordinate represents the normalized intensity value. The expression of circRNAs in each sample was almost the same after normalization. (c) Volcano map: Differentially expressed circRNAs between sepsis and healthy human serum exosomes. (d) Scatter plot: Changes of circRNAs expression levels between sepsis and healthy human serum exosomes. (e) Cluster analysis: the distinguishable circRNA expression profile between sepsis and healthy human serum exosomes. The quantile normalisation and difference analysis were performed using limma package (version 3.48.0) in R. The Volcano map and Scatter plot were performed using python (version 2.7). Cluster analysis was performed using gplots package (version 3.1.1) in R. A total of 13228 circRNAs were detected by circRNA microarray analysis, of which 6247 were upregulated and 6981 were downregulated. Among them, 132 circRNAs were differentially expressed (p < 0.05, fold change > 1.5), including 80 upregulated and 52 downregulated circRNAs. Specific details are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Then, cluster analysis was performed on the significantly differentially expressed circRNAs to visually display the differentially expressed circRNAs and to test their rationality and accuracy. As shown in the heat map (Fig. 2e), red represents highly expressed circRNAs and green represents low-expressed circRNAs. The results showed distinguishable circRNA expression profiles between the two groups of samples.
Table 3

Differentially up-regulated circRNAs in serum exosomes of patients with sepsis.

circRNAAliasP-valueFDRFC (abs)chromcircRNA_typebest_transcriptGeneSymbol
hsa_circRNA_066869hsa_circ_00668690.0227563070.4317416351.5009586chr3Sense overlappingNM_018266TMEM39A
hsa_circRNA_4056610.0395693410.4317416351.6109265chr18Sense overlappingNR_033354ZNF519
hsa_circRNA_001264hsa_circ_00000860.0176991790.4317416351.5018914chr1AntisenseNM_152996ST6GALNAC3
hsa_circRNA_104400hsa_circ_00069440.0433509820.4317416351.7182999chr7ExonicNM_001518GTF2I
hsa_circRNA_101167hsa_circ_00059160.0248049560.4317416351.9019977chr12ExonicNM_012174FBXW8
hsa_circRNA_4070410.0495954120.4317416351.6179568chr8Sense overlappingENST00000518026MSR1
hsa_circRNA_014551hsa_circ_00145510.0308302150.4317416351.6101319chr1ExonicNM_018489ASH1L
hsa_circRNA_4071480.0249957120.4317416351.839682chr9Intergenic
hsa_circRNA_003101hsa_circ_00031010.0423938260.4317416351.6219639chr3ExonicNM_173471SLC25A26
hsa_circRNA_033572hsa_circ_00335720.0070383620.4317416351.8332939chr14ExonicNM_138420AHNAK2
hsa_circRNA_103389hsa_circ_00013090.0268865980.4317416351.7955397chr3ExonicNM_003157NEK4
hsa_circRNA_4010680.0496924980.4317416351.5372069chr12ExonicNM_032814RNFT2
hsa_circRNA_081594hsa_circ_00815940.0337635210.4317416351.5187091chr7ExonicNM_016068FIS1
hsa_circRNA_104030hsa_circ_00015640.0269311840.4317416351.5017159chr5ExonicNM_001746CANX
hsa_circRNA_104283hsa_circ_00016670.0273249910.4317416351.7455824chr7ExonicNM_017802DNAAF5
hsa_circRNA_021708hsa_circ_00217080.0353392710.4317416351.5242451chr11ExonicNM_003477PDHX
hsa_circRNA_103749hsa_circ_00054800.0414317490.4317416351.5968689chr4ExonicNR_036614DCLK2
hsa_circRNA_008026hsa_circ_00080260.0250860190.4317416351.5726361chr4ExonicNM_001221CAMK2D
hsa_circRNA_101205hsa_circ_00060780.0489336280.4317416351.7621779chr12ExonicNM_023928AACS
hsa_circRNA_007507hsa_circ_00075070.0232374680.4317416351.8572626chr5ExonicNM_002890RASA1
hsa_circRNA_103456hsa_circ_00671270.0270065690.4317416351.6842385chr3ExonicNM_012190ALDH1L1
hsa_circRNA_031720hsa_circ_00317200.047675140.4317416351.5353758chr14ExonicNM_006364SEC23A
hsa_circRNA_075166hsa_circ_00751660.0251257070.4317416351.5415749chr5ExonicNM_022455NSD1
hsa_circRNA_001781hsa_circ_00017810.0481810110.4317416351.9555457chr8IntronicENST00000517494CSGALNACT1
hsa_circRNA_101969hsa_circ_00418210.0112834020.4317416351.6567011chr17ExonicNM_032442NEURL4
hsa_circRNA_000947hsa_circ_00009470.0269602690.4317416352.5782047chr19Sense overlappingNM_031485GRWD1
hsa_circRNA_4057170.0367224350.4317416352.010568chr19IntronicENST00000301281UBXN6
hsa_circRNA_002292hsa_circ_00022920.0476931810.4317416351.6544175chr5ExonicNM_153013NADK2
hsa_circRNA_101704hsa_circ_00378580.0454008790.4317416352.1431944chr16ExonicNM_004862LITAF
hsa_circRNA_001063hsa_circ_00010630.0427588310.4317416352.315292chr2Intergenic
hsa_circRNA_102509hsa_circ_00064460.0346849440.4317416352.2800739chr19ExonicNM_015578LSM14A
hsa_circRNA_4065830.0458044910.4317416351.6819656chr5Sense overlappingNM_018140CEP72
hsa_circRNA_102062hsa_circ_00079900.0233221080.4317416351.5649695chr17ExonicNM_033419PGAP3
hsa_circRNA_4057810.0318271490.4317416351.7484564chr19IntronicENST00000221419HNRNPL
hsa_circRNA_000746hsa_circ_00007460.0015729250.4317416352.0290976chr17AntisenseNM_004475FLOT2
hsa_circRNA_000435hsa_circ_00004350.0229280530.4317416351.5484743chr12IntronicENST00000549893C12orf75
hsa_circRNA_001714hsa_circ_00017140.0101985980.4317416355.0265939chr7ExonicNM_032408BAZ1B
hsa_circRNA_040206hsa_circ_00402060.0368366020.4317416351.5041225chr16ExonicNM_007242DDX19B
hsa_circRNA_001226hsa_circ_00012260.0021264630.4317416352.3072386chr22AntisenseNM_002473MYH9
hsa_circRNA_000134hsa_circ_00001340.0490367850.4317416351.7256715chr1AntisenseNM_000565IL6R
hsa_circRNA_087800hsa_circ_00878000.0435639690.4317416351.6403757chr9ExonicNM_018376NIPSNAP3B
hsa_circRNA_400101hsa_circ_00923280.0377022130.4317416351.8812764chr9IntronicENST00000315731RPL7A
hsa_circRNA_001308hsa_circ_00013080.0138506140.4317416353.3527247chr3ExonicNM_003157NEK4
hsa_circRNA_100659hsa_circ_00031680.0497938650.4317416351.5291681chr10ExonicNM_144588ZFYVE27
hsa_circRNA_4044490.0237260170.4317416351.8863782chr1ExonicNM_032409PINK1
hsa_circRNA_102774hsa_circ_00554120.0445518230.4317416351.5443449chr2ExonicNM_001747CAPG
hsa_circRNA_102446hsa_circ_00493560.0171178140.4317416351.8012178chr19ExonicNM_199141CARM1
hsa_circRNA_4035560.007837050.4317416352.0363025chr6Exonicuc010jpp.1LINC00340
hsa_circRNA_000230hsa_circ_00007650.0199972560.4317416351.7827514chr17IntronicENST00000225916KAT2A
hsa_circRNA_007326hsa_circ_00073260.0465434980.4317416351.9909955chr14ExonicNM_014169CHMP4A
hsa_circRNA_4048070.028199080.4317416352.5888983chr10ExonicNM_020682AS3MT
hsa_circRNA_001389hsa_circ_00007290.0278859020.4317416351.5995622chr16IntronicENST00000268699GAS8
hsa_circRNA_4048180.0488090720.4317416352.0947754chr10ExonicNM_000274OAT
hsa_circRNA_001547hsa_circ_00018740.0347424130.4317416352.1924449chr9IntronicENST00000356884BICD2
hsa_circRNA_001241hsa_circ_00005080.0293782160.4317416352.0517604chr13IntronicENST00000326335CUL4A
hsa_circRNA_104671hsa_circ_00018190.0432086550.4317416351.8112929chr8ExonicNM_015902UBR5
hsa_circRNA_102442hsa_circ_00492710.0445923320.4317416352.611047chr19ExonicNM_012289KEAP1
hsa_circRNA_003907hsa_circ_00039070.0383116450.4317416351.833842chr13IntronicENST00000319562FARP1
hsa_circRNA_038516hsa_circ_00385160.0398115550.4317416351.7176617chr16ExonicNM_018119POLR3E
hsa_circRNA_4058720.0319805640.4317416351.6275643chr2Exonicuc002ruu.3PRKCE
hsa_circRNA_101458hsa_circ_00340440.0211274050.4317416351.7423746chr15Exonicuc001ytg.3HERC2P3
hsa_circRNA_4054430.0032249180.4317416352.1653199chr16IntronicENST00000342673NDE1
hsa_circRNA_004077hsa_circ_00040770.0376880650.4317416354.1270503chr16ExonicNM_020927VAT1L
hsa_circRNA_103852hsa_circ_00726650.0136501680.4317416352.2677625chr5ExonicNM_197941ADAMTS6
hsa_circRNA_023461hsa_circ_00234610.0009183030.4317416352.3023746chr11ExonicNM_015242ARAP1
hsa_circRNA_103864hsa_circ_00057300.0276265180.4317416352.7818978chr5ExonicNM_001799CDK7
hsa_circRNA_001653hsa_circ_00015680.0169026030.4317416356.1554028chr6IntronicENST00000344450DUSP22
hsa_circRNA_001405hsa_circ_00011670.0427577180.4317416352.7907614chr20IntronicENST00000371941PREX1
hsa_circRNA_043943hsa_circ_00439430.0176299780.4317416351.9805323chr17Exonicuc010cyw.1VAT1
hsa_circRNA_045799hsa_circ_00457990.0279738960.4317416351.7012317chr17ExonicNM_022066UBE2O
hsa_circRNA_4062950.0396698860.4317416351.5046538chr3Sense overlappingNR_109992SUCLG2-AS1
hsa_circRNA_104484hsa_circ_00823260.0355524270.4317416354.3097053chr7ExonicNM_016478ZC3HC1
hsa_circRNA_100329hsa_circ_00063520.046708560.4317416351.598139chr1ExonicNM_012432SETDB1
hsa_circRNA_007771hsa_circ_00077710.0282869030.4317416351.6641182chr6ExonicNM_032832LRP11
hsa_circRNA_101491hsa_circ_00347620.0392409760.4317416354.4110245chr15ExonicNM_014994MAPKBP1
hsa_circRNA_020622hsa_circ_00206220.0353765670.4317416351.6406534chr11ExonicNM_006435IFITM2
hsa_circRNA_102481hsa_circ_00032530.0166034370.4317416351.7146811chr19ExonicNM_014173BABAM1
hsa_circRNA_103444hsa_circ_00087970.0285625860.4317416352.5886681chr3ExonicNM_002093GSK3B
hsa_circRNA_104670hsa_circ_00018180.0216258320.4317416353.9778781chr8ExonicNM_015902UBR5
hsa_circRNA_4061260.0231249640.4317416351.757962chr20IntronicENST00000244070PPP4R1L
hsa_circRNA_000911hsa_circ_00011840.0231416820.4317416351.5147777chr21IntronicENST00000290219IFNGR2

FDR: false discover rate; FC: fold change.

Table 4

Differentially down-regulated circRNAs in serum exosomes of patients with sepsis.

circRNAAliasP-valueFDRFC (abs)chromcircRNA_typebest_transcriptGeneSymbol
hsa_circRNA_006750hsa_circ_00067500.0375757770.4317416351.5167592chr10ExonicNM_015188TBC1D12
hsa_circRNA_008289hsa_circ_00082890.0078612320.4317416351.5038783chr6ExonicNM_012454TIAM2
hsa_circRNA_072654hsa_circ_00726540.0041506550.4317416353.1968303chr5ExonicNM_005869CWC27
hsa_circRNA_009554hsa_circ_00095540.0443344920.4317416351.5604032chr1ExonicNM_007262PARK7
hsa_circRNA_030788hsa_circ_00307880.0472618990.4317416351.6207698chr13ExonicNM_052867NALCN
hsa_circRNA_4008500.0360970770.4317416351.650349chr11ExonicNM_016146TRAPPC4
hsa_circRNA_4044590.0026344920.4317416351.6303638chr1ExonicNM_022778CEP85
hsa_circRNA_102912hsa_circ_00580550.0194672220.4317416351.5068981chr2ExonicNM_000465BARD1
hsa_circRNA_032891hsa_circ_00328910.0319392820.4317416351.5637739chr14ExonicNM_145231EFCAB11
hsa_circRNA_4018290.0326981870.4317416351.5255687chr17ExonicNM_178509STXBP4
hsa_circRNA_4005110.0238012420.4317416351.6454873chr10ExonicNM_014142NUDT5
hsa_circRNA_100726hsa_circ_00024560.0254584710.4317416351.5928692chr10ExonicNM_001380DOCK1
hsa_circRNA_4053720.0390652160.4317416351.5208354chr15Sense overlappingNR_040051IQCH-AS1
hsa_circRNA_007352hsa_circ_00073520.0324094730.4317416354.6954462chrXExonicNM_005088AKAP17A
hsa_circRNA_104639hsa_circ_00846690.0488131580.4317416351.6255475chr8ExonicNM_024790CSPP1
hsa_circRNA_4061940.0038247860.4317416352.0373362chr22Sense overlappingNM_013365GGA1
hsa_circRNA_4064450.0396300110.4317416351.5055446chr4IntronicENST00000264956EVC
hsa_circRNA_4055710.0388800480.4317416351.9452313chr17ExonicENST00000589153TADA2A
hsa_circRNA_4057910.0165401180.4317416351.5537398chr19ExonicNM_006663PPP1R13L
hsa_circRNA_104964hsa_circ_00065020.0313137410.4317416351.6161558chr9ExonicNM_138778DPH7
hsa_circRNA_100631hsa_circ_00061480.0121107840.4317416352.1672149chr10ExonicNM_144660SAMD8
hsa_circRNA_4057460.0237102340.4317416351.8437062chr19ExonicNM_032207C19orf44
hsa_circRNA_101461hsa_circ_00340720.0169911540.4317416351.8499723chr15ExonicNM_014608CYFIP1
hsa_circRNA_063280hsa_circ_00632800.0460698640.4317416351.5904218chr22ExonicNM_012407PICK1
hsa_circRNA_4054770.029272570.4317416351.7238343chr16IntronicENST00000264005LCAT
hsa_circRNA_400042hsa_circ_00923020.0251023410.4317416351.5460887chr19IntronicENST00000325327LMNB2
hsa_circRNA_040203hsa_circ_00402030.0285121250.4317416351.5408761chr16ExonicNM_001605AARS
hsa_circRNA_076057hsa_circ_00760570.0476368750.4317416351.571403chr6ExonicNM_017754UHRF1BP1
hsa_circRNA_001729hsa_circ_00006910.0486522580.4317416351.7920519chr16AntisenseNM_014699ZNF646
hsa_circRNA_004738hsa_circ_00047380.0430028380.4317416351.6720137chr5ExonicNM_022897RANBP17
hsa_circRNA_100559hsa_circ_00002190.0142980380.4317416351.5281119chr10ExonicNM_024948FAM188A
hsa_circRNA_002773hsa_circ_00027730.0298691330.4317416351.5045762chr11ExonicNM_002906RDX
hsa_circRNA_104004hsa_circ_00749300.0214455030.4317416351.9530485chr5ExonicNM_003062SLIT3
hsa_circRNA_100317hsa_circ_00083900.044902150.4317416352.1464941chr1ExonicNM_022359PDE4DIP
hsa_circRNA_100707hsa_circ_00203130.0296671990.4317416351.6620556chr10ExonicNM_022126LHPP
hsa_circRNA_102461hsa_circ_00039350.0134835060.4317416351.5061068chr19ExonicNM_000068CACNA1A
hsa_circRNA_060123hsa_circ_00601230.0288909290.4317416351.5685863chr20Exonicuc002xdn.1CPNE1
hsa_circRNA_4046860.0127680840.4317416351.9349548chr1ExonicNM_003272GPR137B
hsa_circRNA_101321hsa_circ_00029280.0423214360.4317416351.611344chr14ExonicNM_006109PRMT5
hsa_circRNA_100536hsa_circ_00053790.0417301720.4317416351.9452874chr10ExonicNM_001494GDI2
hsa_circRNA_4009940.0110099910.4317416351.5005858chr12Exonicuc001syj.2ZDHHC17
hsa_circRNA_103291hsa_circ_00066730.0407430750.4317416351.6483582chr3ExonicNM_025265TSEN2
hsa_circRNA_102116hsa_circ_00032580.0059186650.4317416351.5865527chr17ExonicNM_014897ZNF652
hsa_circRNA_102950hsa_circ_00587940.0438723760.4317416351.7071378chr2ExonicNM_014914AGAP1
hsa_circRNA_020962hsa_circ_00209620.0393590990.4317416351.6353777chr11Exonicuc001mai.1HBG2
hsa_circRNA_003508hsa_circ_00035080.0350351010.4317416351.9070829chr17ExonicNR_036474GPATCH8
hsa_circRNA_008609hsa_circ_00086090.0370887260.4317416351.5778959chr2ExonicNR_028356MRPL30
hsa_circRNA_100632hsa_circ_00189050.0441022130.4317416355.3789756chr10ExonicNM_144660SAMD8
hsa_circRNA_4064750.0425710450.4317416351.5153569chr4IntronicENST00000264319FRYL
hsa_circRNA_4012990.047437860.4317416351.6724819chr14ExonicNM_145231EFCAB11
hsa_circRNA_102025hsa_circ_00075420.046306290.4317416351.5477632chr17ExonicNM_000267NF1
hsa_circRNA_001101hsa_circ_00011010.0201387290.4317416351.6929037chr2ExonicNM_020830WDFY1
hsa_circRNA_012123hsa_circ_00121230.0462184360.4317416351.7972517chr1Exonicuc001clf.3ATP6V0B

FDR: false discover rate; FC: fold change.

Differentially up-regulated circRNAs in serum exosomes of patients with sepsis. FDR: false discover rate; FC: fold change. Differentially down-regulated circRNAs in serum exosomes of patients with sepsis. FDR: false discover rate; FC: fold change.

RT-qPCR validation of the differentially expressed circRNAs

RT-qPCR was used to verify the differentially expressed circRNAs in sepsis. We selected five circRNAs that are most likely to be related to sepsis for verification based on the fold changes in microarray analysis: hsa_circRNA_406194, hsa_circRNA_104670, hsa_circRNA_104484, hsa_circRNA_103864, and hsa_circRNA_101491. Because the microarray analysis may contain false positive results, we first verified in 3 sepsis patients and 3 healthy volunteers that had been tested by microarray to confirm the accurate expression of circRNAs. The expression levels of hsa_circRNA_406194 (0.95 ± 0.32 to 1.05 ± 0.37; p = 0.751), hsa_circRNA_104670 (2.37 ± 0.19 to 1.02 ± 0.23; p = 0.001), hsa_circRNA_104484 (1.98 ± 0.08 to 1.01 ± 0.15; p = 0.001), hsa_circRNA_103864 (1.62 ± 0.68 to 1.04 ± 0.36; p = 0.265), and hsa_circRNA_101491 (1.18 ± 0.55 to 1.03 ± 0.28; p = 0.699) (Fig. 3). Among these five circRNAs, only hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 were significantly increased.
Figure 3

RT-qPCR verification of five circRNAs in microarray samples. The drawings were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0, https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/).

RT-qPCR verification of five circRNAs in microarray samples. The drawings were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0, https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/). We further verified the expression levels of hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in the serum exosomes of 22 patients with sepsis and 19 controls collected subsequently. As shown in Fig. 4, the expression of hsa_circRNA_104484 (1.829 ± 0.718 to 1.124 ± 0.506; p = 0.005) and hsa_circRNA_104670 (2.045 [1.319–3.049] to 0.948 [0.684–1.639]; p = 0.003) in serum exosomes of patients with sepsis increased, and the expression differences were statistically significant, which was consistent with the results of microarray analysis.
Figure 4

Expression of hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in the serum exosomes of 22 patients with sepsis and 19 controls.

Expression of hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in the serum exosomes of 22 patients with sepsis and 19 controls.

ROC analysis of serum exosomal hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in sepsis

The results of qPCR were used to construct the ROC curve to evaluate the diagnostic value of exosomal hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in sepsis (Fig. 5). Compared with healthy subjects, the AUC of hsa_circRNA_104484 in sepsis exosomes was 0.782 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.643–0.921; p < 0.05), the sensitivity and specificity were 0.545 and 0.947, respectively. The highest Youden index was 0.492 and the corresponding optimal cut-off value was 31.901. The AUC of hsa_circRNA_104670 was 0.775 (95% CI: 0.632–0.919; p < 0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.591 and 0.895, respectively. The highest Youden index was 0.486 and the corresponding optimal cut-off value was 1.357. The results indicate that hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 have a medium diagnostic value and have the potential to be used as diagnostic markers in sepsis.
Figure 5

ROC curve for hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670.

ROC curve for hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670.

Identification of circRNA‐targeting miRNAs and construction of circRNA‐miRNA‐mRNA networks

Arraystar microRNA prediction software was used to predict the miRNAs targeted by hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670. The results showed that the miRNAs targeted by hsa_circRNA_104484 were hsa-miR-34b-5p, hsa-miR-508-3p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, hsa-miR-378d, and hsa-miR-30c-2-3p. Further, the miRNAs targeted by hsa_circRNA_104670 were hsa-miR-17-3p, hsa-miR-433-3p, hsa-miR-367-5p, hsa-miR-335-3p, and hsa-miR-642a-5p. The interaction between circRNA-microRNA is annotated in detail, and the results are shown in Fig. 6a. The ceRNA network was used to visually show the relationship between hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670, miRNAs, and target genes (Fig. 6b).
Figure 6

Prediction of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory relationship. (a) Annotation of detailed regulatory relationship between hsa_circRNA_104484, hsa_circRNA_104670 and miRNAs. (b) circRNA‐miRNA‐mRNA network established using hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670.

Prediction of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory relationship. (a) Annotation of detailed regulatory relationship between hsa_circRNA_104484, hsa_circRNA_104670 and miRNAs. (b) circRNA‐miRNA‐mRNA network established using hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670.

Prediction of the potential functions of target genes

GO analysis results showed that the biological process and molecular functions of target genes were concentrated in several aspects, such as ‘negative regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter’, ‘transcription’, ‘positive regulation of transcription’, ‘negative regulation of transcription’, ‘positive regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter’, ‘protein binding’, ‘DNA binding’, ‘transcriptional activator activity’, ‘RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity’, ‘transcription factor activity’, and ‘transcriptional repressor activity’ (Fig. 7a). Most of them were related to the transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Therefore, hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 might participate in the process of sepsis by regulating transcription.
Figure 7

Functional analysis of circRNA. (a) Gene Ontology Analysis. (b) KEGG pathway Enrichment Analysis. The drawings were performed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.43, https://www.microsoft.com/zh-cn/microsoft-365/excel).

Functional analysis of circRNA. (a) Gene Ontology Analysis. (b) KEGG pathway Enrichment Analysis. The drawings were performed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.43, https://www.microsoft.com/zh-cn/microsoft-365/excel). KEGG pathway analysis results show that the target gene-related signalling pathways are the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, signalling pathways regulating the pluripotency of stem cells, the MAPK signalling pathway, hepatitis B, viral carcinogenesis, osteoclast differentiation, hepatitis C, HTLV-I infection, TNF signalling pathway, and the insulin signalling pathway, among others (Fig. 7b). Among them, the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway[22], MAPK signalling pathway[23], and the TNF signalling pathway have been confirmed by several studies to be related to sepsis.

Discussion

In recent years, despite significant advances in antimicrobial treatment and organ support technologies, sepsis remains the leading cause of death in patients with severe infections[24]. This may be related to the lack of specificity of clinical manifestations, the complexity of pathophysiological processes, and the heterogeneity of sepsis[5]. Unfortunately, despite the continuous exploration of its mechanism, our understanding of it is still far from being sufficient. In fact, there are currently no laboratory testing methods to accurately identify sepsis and there are no individualised therapies to cure it. Therefore, researchers are committed to developing a precision medicine method that aims to classify patients into different types based on transcriptomic signatures and other biological and clinical data, thus providing a molecular basis for precision targeted therapy. Improving the identification and diagnosis of sepsis, exploring its pathogenesis, classification, and individualised therapy can maximise the efficacy and improve prognosis. In recent years, exosomes have been extensively studied as a new form of intercellular signal transduction. Studies have shown that circRNAs are specifically enriched and stable in exosomes and can be detected in a variety of bodily fluids[17]. This means that exosomal circRNA has the potential to diagnose diseases as a biomarker[5,19]. They are also involved in the pathogenesis of various diseases, such as tumours[25,26], cardiovascular diseases[27-29], neurological disorders[30-32], infections, and immune-related diseases[30,33,34], indicating that they may be used as targets for precise treatment. To date, the expression and function of exosomal circRNAs in sepsis have not been reported. In order to clarify their regulatory role in the pathophysiology of sepsis, it is necessary to explore the changes in circRNA expression levels in serum exosomes and their regulatory pathways. By comparing and analysing the results of microarrays, molecules with fold changes > 1.5 and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Then, we selected five circRNA molecules for experimental verification, including hsa_circRNA_101491, hsa_circRNA_103864, hsa_circRNA_104484, hsa_circRNA_104670, and hsa_circRNA_406194. These circRNA molecules were then verified by RT-qPCR among the 3 septic patients and 3 healthy volunteers that had been tested by microarray to determine the reliability of the microarray results. Among these five circRNA molecules, the expression of two circRNA molecules (hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670) were significantly upregulated, consistent with the microarray results, but the other three circRNA molecules (hsa_circRNA_101491, hsa_circRNA_103864, and hsa_circRNA_406194) were not significantly different between the two groups. This indicates that microarray results contain false positives, thus, only differential circRNA molecules qualified by RT-qPCR are considered reliable. We continued to verify hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in small clinical samples, and the results are consistent with those of previous studies. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report the expression of hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 in sepsis serum exosomes. At present, ceRNA is the most common circRNA regulation mechanism. CircRNA targets miRNAs and indirectly regulates the expression of miRNA target genes and plays an important role in the occurrence and development of diseases[35]. Studies have found that circulating miRNAs are differentially expressed in inflammation-related diseases and can target the tumour necrosis factor pathway (TLR/NF-κB signalling pathway), acting as inflammation regulators[36,37]. Therefore, we speculate that circRNA may indirectly regulate the expression of inflammation-related genes by targeting miRNAs in sepsis. The annotation of the circRNA-miRNA regulatory axis and the construction of the ceRNA network showed that five miRNAs and several targeted mRNAs interacted with hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670, respectively. Among them, hsa_circRNA_104484 is a sponge molecule of hsa-miR-378a-3p/hsa-miR-378d. In recent experimental studies, miR-378 has been found to act directly or indirectly as a regulator of inflammation and participates in the processes of inflammation and immune regulation. Platelet-derived exosomal miR-378a-3p directly targets PDK1, resulting in the inhibition of the Akt/mTOR pathway and promoting the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) in sepsis[38]. A study by Caserta et al.[36] showed that miR-378a-3p is differentially expressed in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and correlated with its severity. miR-378a can directly target ZBTB20, which plays a role in cell growth and apoptosis[39]. ZBTB20 is a transcriptional repressor that inhibits the transcription of the IκBα gene and positively regulates the activation of NF-κB, triggering an innate immune response[40,41]. This is consistent with the results of the GO analysis. In addition, miR-378 negatively regulates nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1), AMP-activated protein kinase γ2 (AMPKγ2), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), inhibits energy metabolism processes, and activates the NF-κB-TNFα pathway, which may be related to SIRS and sepsis[42-44]. Similarly, hsa_circRNA_104670 is a sponge molecule of hsa-miR-17-3p. Jiang and Li et al.[45] found that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and TNF-α can regulate the expression of miR-17-3p. miR-17-3p directly targets intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and inhibits its expression in LPS-induced acute lung injury (ALI)[46]. ICAM-1 is an important inflammatory mediator, and its expression is upregulated in sepsis, which enhances inflammatory cell infiltration and organ damage[47,48]. Therefore, we speculate that hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 may be involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis.

Conclusions

Our study compared the differences in the expression levels of circRNAs in serum exosomes between sepsis and healthy people, and initially evaluated the clinical application value of hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670. The results provide a basis for mechanistic research. However, our research sample is relatively small; in the future, the sample size will be enlarged. We will further explore the biological functions of hsa_circRNA_104484 and hsa_circRNA_104670 through cell and animal experiments. Currently, the pathogenesis of sepsis is still unclear. As such, there is no effective therapeutic intervention; the exploration of the circRNA regulatory mechanism in sepsis will have great clinical translation research value. Supplementary Information.
  48 in total

1.  Circular Ribonucleic Acid Expression Alteration in Exosomes from the Brain Extracellular Space after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice.

Authors:  Rui-Ting Zhao; Ju Zhou; Xin-Long Dong; Chong-Wen Bi; Rong-Cai Jiang; Jing-Fei Dong; Ye Tian; Heng-Jie Yuan; Jian-Ning Zhang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Yan Li; Qiupeng Zheng; Chunyang Bao; Shuyi Li; Weijie Guo; Jiang Zhao; Di Chen; Jianren Gu; Xianghuo He; Shenglin Huang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Long non-coding RNA LINC00641 promotes cell growth and migration through modulating miR-378a/ZBTB20 axis in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  J Wang; Z-H Liu; L-J Yu
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.507

4.  A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language?

Authors:  Leonardo Salmena; Laura Poliseno; Yvonne Tay; Lev Kats; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Induction of MiR-17-3p and MiR-106a [corrected] by TNFα and LPS.

Authors:  Xin Jiang; Nancy Li
Journal:  Cell Biochem Funct       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.685

6.  Hepatic miR-378 targets p110α and controls glucose and lipid homeostasis by modulating hepatic insulin signalling.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Hongchao Cao; Cheng Ye; Cunjie Chang; Minghua Lu; Yanyan Jing; Duo Zhang; Xuan Yao; Zhengjun Duan; Hongfeng Xia; Yu-Cheng Wang; Jingjing Jiang; Mo-Fang Liu; Jun Yan; Hao Ying
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Cutting edge: TNF-induced microRNAs regulate TNF-induced expression of E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on human endothelial cells: feedback control of inflammation.

Authors:  Yajaira Suárez; Chen Wang; Thomas D Manes; Jordan S Pober
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Circular RNA is expressed across the eukaryotic tree of life.

Authors:  Peter L Wang; Yun Bao; Muh-Ching Yee; Steven P Barrett; Gregory J Hogan; Mari N Olsen; José R Dinneny; Patrick O Brown; Julia Salzman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Platelet-derived exosomes promote neutrophil extracellular trap formation during septic shock.

Authors:  Yang Jiao; Weiwei Li; Wei Wang; Xingyu Tong; Ran Xia; Jie Fan; Jianer Du; Chengmi Zhang; Xueyin Shi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Astaxanthin suppresses lipopolysaccharide‑induced myocardial injury by regulating MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR/GSK3β signaling.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Xie; Guo Hou; Lu Wang; Sha-Sha Wang; Xiao-Xing Xiong
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.952

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Non-Coding RNA Networks as Potential Novel Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Sepsis and Sepsis-Related Multi-Organ Failure.

Authors:  Domenico Di Raimondo; Edoardo Pirera; Giuliana Rizzo; Irene Simonetta; Gaia Musiari; Antonino Tuttolomondo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 2.  Roles of circRNAs in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Fahua Deng; Chengsi Zhang; Tingting Lu; Ezhong Joshua Liao; Hai Huang; Sixi Wei
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 3.  Emerging role of exosomes in cancer progression and tumor microenvironment remodeling.

Authors:  Mahshid Deldar Abad Paskeh; Maliheh Entezari; Sepideh Mirzaei; Amirhossein Zabolian; Hossein Saleki; Mohamad Javad Naghdi; Sina Sabet; Mohammad Amin Khoshbakht; Mehrdad Hashemi; Kiavash Hushmandi; Gautam Sethi; Ali Zarrabi; Alan Prem Kumar; Shing Cheng Tan; Marios Papadakis; Athanasios Alexiou; Md Asiful Islam; Ebrahim Mostafavi; Milad Ashrafizadeh
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 23.168

Review 4.  Circular RNAs and Their Role in Exosomes.

Authors:  Zeping Han; Huafang Chen; Zhonghui Guo; Jian Shen; Wenfeng Luo; Fangmei Xie; Yu Wan; Shengbo Wang; Jianhao Li; Jinhua He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  Exosomal RNAs: Novel Potential Biomarkers for Diseases-A Review.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Bing-Lin Yue; Yong-Zhen Huang; Xian-Yong Lan; Wu-Jun Liu; Hong Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  circ-Katnal1 Enhances Inflammatory Pyroptosis in Sepsis-Induced Liver Injury through the miR-31-5p/GSDMD Axis.

Authors:  Kai Kang; Nana Li; Yang Gao; Changsong Wang; Pengfei Chen; Xianglin Meng; Wei Yang; Mingyan Zhao; Kaijiang Yu
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.529

Review 7.  Regulatory Role of Non-Coding RNAs on Immune Responses During Sepsis.

Authors:  Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard; Tayyebeh Khoshbakht; Bashdar Mahmud Hussen; Mohammad Taheri; Normohammad Arefian
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.