Anthony Spirito1, Bridget Nestor2, Maya Massing-Schaffer2, Christianne Esposito-Smythers3, Robert Stout4, Elisabeth Frazier5, Judelysse Gomez6, Hannah Graves2, Shirley Yen2, Jeffrey Hunt5, Jennifer Wolff7. 1. Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, United States of America. Electronic address: Anthony_Spirito@brown.edu. 2. Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, United States of America. 3. George Mason University, United States of America. 4. Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, United States of America; Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Pawtucket, RI, United States of America. 5. Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, United States of America; Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital, Riverside, RI, United States of America. 6. Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, United States of America; Connecticut College, Psychology Department, New London, CT, United States of America. 7. Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, United States of America; Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current study identifies predictors and moderators of substance use outcomes for 111 adolescents with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders who participated in a randomized controlled trial that compared the effectiveness of two home-based treatments: an integrated cognitive behavioral therapy (I-CBT) protocol, in which masters-level clinic staff received intensive training and ongoing supervision in the use of this protocol versus a treatment-as-usual (TAU) comparison condition in which therapists received a continuing education-style CBT workshop in the same protocol. METHOD: The study conducted exploratory predictor and moderator analyses of marijuana and heavy alcohol use outcomes using candidate variables across four domains of psychological characteristics: adolescent substance use, adolescent psychiatric symptoms, parent, and family. RESULTS: Regardless of treatment condition, low parental monitoring at baseline, as assessed by a videotaped interaction task, but not self-report, predicted greater percentage of marijuana use and heavy alcohol use days over the 6-month follow-up period. If parents entered treatment with low levels of parental monitoring, adolescents in the I-CBT condition reduced their percentage of heavy alcohol use days significantly more than adolescents in TAU over the 6-month follow-up period. Greater adolescent aggression and parental emotion dysregulation at baseline also predicted greater percentage of marijuana use days over the 6-month follow-up period for the sample as a whole. Adolescents in the I-CBT condition who reported low positive urgency at baseline reduced their percentage of heavy alcohol use days significantly more than adolescents in TAU care over the 6-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The article discusses implications for clinical decision-making, improving treatment effectiveness, and tailoring interventions for adolescents with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders.
BACKGROUND: The current study identifies predictors and moderators of substance use outcomes for 111 adolescents with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders who participated in a randomized controlled trial that compared the effectiveness of two home-based treatments: an integrated cognitive behavioral therapy (I-CBT) protocol, in which masters-level clinic staff received intensive training and ongoing supervision in the use of this protocol versus a treatment-as-usual (TAU) comparison condition in which therapists received a continuing education-style CBT workshop in the same protocol. METHOD: The study conducted exploratory predictor and moderator analyses of marijuana and heavy alcohol use outcomes using candidate variables across four domains of psychological characteristics: adolescent substance use, adolescent psychiatric symptoms, parent, and family. RESULTS: Regardless of treatment condition, low parental monitoring at baseline, as assessed by a videotaped interaction task, but not self-report, predicted greater percentage of marijuana use and heavy alcohol use days over the 6-month follow-up period. If parents entered treatment with low levels of parental monitoring, adolescents in the I-CBT condition reduced their percentage of heavy alcohol use days significantly more than adolescents in TAU over the 6-month follow-up period. Greater adolescent aggression and parental emotion dysregulation at baseline also predicted greater percentage of marijuana use days over the 6-month follow-up period for the sample as a whole. Adolescents in the I-CBT condition who reported low positive urgency at baseline reduced their percentage of heavy alcohol use days significantly more than adolescents in TAU care over the 6-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The article discusses implications for clinical decision-making, improving treatment effectiveness, and tailoring interventions for adolescents with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders.
Authors: Christianne Esposito-Smythers; Anthony Spirito; Christopher W Kahler; Jeffrey Hunt; Peter Monti Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2011-10-17
Authors: B Birmaher; S Khetarpal; D Brent; M Cully; L Balach; J Kaufman; S M Neer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 8.829