Literature DB >> 34238076

Regulations and Norms for Reuse of Residual Clinical Biospecimens and Health Data.

Elizabeth E Umberfield1,2, Sharon L R Kardia3, Yun Jiang4, Andrea K Thomer5, Marcelline R Harris4.   

Abstract

Nurse scientists are increasingly interested in conducting secondary research using real world collections of biospecimens and health data. The purposes of this scoping review are to (a) identify federal regulations and norms that bear authority or give guidance over reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data, (b) summarize domain experts' interpretations of permissions of such reuse, and (c) summarize key issues for interpreting regulations and norms. Final analysis included 25 manuscripts and 23 regulations and norms. This review illustrates contextual complexity for reusing residual clinical biospecimens and health data, and explores issues such as privacy, confidentiality, and deriving genetic information from biospecimens. Inconsistencies make it difficult to interpret, which regulations or norms apply, or if applicable regulations or norms are congruent. Tools are necessary to support consistent, expert-informed consent processes and downstream reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data by nurse scientists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biospecimen research; data sharing and reuse; health data; nursing research; residual clinical biospecimens

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34238076      PMCID: PMC8741881          DOI: 10.1177/01939459211029296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.774


  37 in total

1.  HUGO Ethics Committee Statement on DNA sampling: control and access.

Authors:  B M Knoppers; M Hirtle; S Lormeau; C M Laberge; M Laflamme
Journal:  Genetic Resour       Date:  1998

2.  Genomic Justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai Case on Genetic Research.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2012-12-21

3.  Biobanking and international interoperability: samples.

Authors:  Michael Kiehntopf; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  The biobank consent debate: why 'meta-consent' is still the solution!

Authors:  Thomas Ploug; Soren Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.

Authors:  Heather L Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; Kelly K O'Brien; Sharon Straus; Andrea C Tricco; Laure Perrier; Monika Kastner; David Moher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Research Information for Reasonable People.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Reducing patient re-identification risk for laboratory results within research datasets.

Authors:  Ravi V Atreya; Joshua C Smith; Allison B McCoy; Bradley Malin; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking (or the Unexpected Virtue of Pluralism).

Authors:  Adrian Thorogood; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 9.  Ethical Legal and Social Issues of Biobanking: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Marianna J Bledsoe
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Emerging ethical issues regarding digital health data. On the World Medical Association Draft Declaration on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases and Biobanks.

Authors:  Christine Aicardi; Lorenzo Del Savio; Edward S Dove; Federica Lucivero; Niccolo Tempini; Barbara Prainsack
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.