| Literature DB >> 34238027 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND.: Client-centred practice has been part of occupational therapists' identity for several decades. However, therapists have begun to question whether the term obstructs critical relational aspects of therapy. PURPOSE.: The purpose of this article is to summarize critiques of the use of the term client-centred and propose an expanded descriptor and a fundamental shift in how occupational therapists engage with individuals, families, groups, communities, and populations. KEY ISSUES.: Three themes summarize critiques of how client-centred practice has been envisioned: (a) the language of client-centred, (b) insufficient appreciation of how the therapist affects the relationship, and (c) inadequate consideration of the relational context of occupation. We propose collaborative relationship-focused practice that has key relational elements of being contextually relevant, nuanced, and safe, and promotes rights-based self-determination. CONCLUSION.: We argue that these essential relational elements, along with a focus on occupations, are required to promote occupational participation, equity, and justice.Entities:
Keywords: Participation; Power; Professional–patient relations; Reflexivity; pouvoir; professionnel–patient relations; réflexivité
Year: 2021 PMID: 34238027 DOI: 10.1177/00084174211022889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Occup Ther ISSN: 0008-4174 Impact factor: 1.614