PURPOSE: To compare attempted versus achieved corneal stromal thickness reduction in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in one eye and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in the other eye. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study included 22 consecutive patients (44 eyes), one eye randomized to have myopic LASIK and the contralateral eye to have SMILE. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. For each of the treatment groups, the achieved maximum stromal thickness reduction was compared to the planned/attempted thickness. The deviation of planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction was then compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 3 months postoperatively, LASIK had a lower difference between planned versus attempted stromal thickness reduction compared to SMILE (13.72 ± 14.45 vs 24.00 ± 19.45 µm, P = .03). Graphical analysis revealed this deviation to be exaggerated in higher myopic errors, when a higher maximum stromal reduction was planned. The mean stromal reduction thickness was 83.40 ± 29.52 µm achieved versus 97.13 ± 25.69 µm mean planned ablation depth in the LASIK group (P < .001) compared to 76.45 ± 29.69 µm achieved versus 100.45 ± 26.56 µm planned ablation depth in the SMILE group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:LASIK had a significantly lower difference between planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction when compared to SMILE (P = .03). This difference was more apparent in higher myopic corrections. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(7):454-459.].
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare attempted versus achieved corneal stromal thickness reduction in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in one eye and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in the other eye. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study included 22 consecutive patients (44 eyes), one eye randomized to have myopic LASIK and the contralateral eye to have SMILE. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. For each of the treatment groups, the achieved maximum stromal thickness reduction was compared to the planned/attempted thickness. The deviation of planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction was then compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 3 months postoperatively, LASIK had a lower difference between planned versus attempted stromal thickness reduction compared to SMILE (13.72 ± 14.45 vs 24.00 ± 19.45 µm, P = .03). Graphical analysis revealed this deviation to be exaggerated in higher myopic errors, when a higher maximum stromal reduction was planned. The mean stromal reduction thickness was 83.40 ± 29.52 µm achieved versus 97.13 ± 25.69 µm mean planned ablation depth in the LASIK group (P < .001) compared to 76.45 ± 29.69 µm achieved versus 100.45 ± 26.56 µm planned ablation depth in the SMILE group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: LASIK had a significantly lower difference between planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction when compared to SMILE (P = .03). This difference was more apparent in higher myopic corrections. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(7):454-459.].