Literature DB >> 34236668

Integrative Analysis of Incongruous Cancer Genomics and Proteomics Datasets.

Karla Cervantes-Gracia1, Richard Chahwan1, Holger Husi2,3.   

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease characterized by molecular heterogeneity and the involvement of several cellular mechanisms throughout its evolution and pathogenesis. Despite the great efforts made to untangle these mechanisms, cancer pathophysiology remains far from clear. So far, panels of biomarkers have been reported from high-throughput data generated through different platforms. These biomarkers are primarily focused on one type of coding molecules such as transcripts or proteins, mainly due to the apparent heterogeneity of output data resulting from the use of various techniques specific to the molecular type. Hence, there is a major need to understand how these molecules interact and complement each other to be able to explain the deregulated processes involved. The breadth of large-scale data availability as well as the lack of in-depth analysis of publicly available data has raised concerns and enabled opportunities for new strategies to analyze "Big data" more comprehensively. Here, a new protocol to perform integrative analysis based on a systems biology approach is described. The foundation of the approach relies on groups of datasets from published studies compared within the original described groups and organized in a designated format to allow the integration and cross-comparison among different studies and different platforms. This approach follows an unbiased hypothesis-free methodology that will facilitate the identification of commonalities among different data-set sources, and ultimately map and characterize specific molecular pathways using significantly deregulated molecules. This in turn will generate novel insights about the mechanisms deregulated in complex diseases such as cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; High-throughput data; Integrative analysis; Molecular biomarkers; OMICS; Systems biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34236668     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1641-3_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  39 in total

Review 1.  Precision diagnostics: moving towards protein biomarker signatures of clinical utility in cancer.

Authors:  Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Next-Generation Sequencing Strategies.

Authors:  Shawn E Levy; Braden E Boone
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jing Wang; Xiaojing Wang; Jing Zhu; Qi Liu; Zhiao Shi; Matthew C Chambers; Lisa J Zimmerman; Kent F Shaddox; Sangtae Kim; Sherri R Davies; Sean Wang; Pei Wang; Christopher R Kinsinger; Robert C Rivers; Henry Rodriguez; R Reid Townsend; Matthew J C Ellis; Steven A Carr; David L Tabb; Robert J Coffey; Robbert J C Slebos; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The long journey of cancer biomarkers from the bench to the clinic.

Authors:  Maria P Pavlou; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Ivan M Blasutig
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses.

Authors:  Christine Vogel; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies.

Authors:  Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Urine Proteome Profiling Predicts Lung Cancer from Control Cases and Other Tumors.

Authors:  Chunchao Zhang; Wenchuan Leng; Changqing Sun; Tianyuan Lu; Zhengang Chen; Xuebo Men; Yi Wang; Guangshun Wang; Bei Zhen; Jun Qin
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  Feasibility and utility of a panel testing for 114 cancer-associated genes in a clinical setting: A hospital-based study.

Authors:  Kuniko Sunami; Hitoshi Ichikawa; Takashi Kubo; Mamoru Kato; Yutaka Fujiwara; Akihiko Shimomura; Takafumi Koyama; Hiroki Kakishima; Mayuko Kitami; Hiromichi Matsushita; Eisaku Furukawa; Daichi Narushima; Momoko Nagai; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Noriko Motoi; Shigeki Sekine; Akiko Maeshima; Taisuke Mori; Reiko Watanabe; Masayuki Yoshida; Akihiko Yoshida; Hiroshi Yoshida; Kaishi Satomi; Aoi Sukeda; Taiki Hashimoto; Toshio Shimizu; Satoru Iwasa; Kan Yonemori; Ken Kato; Chigusa Morizane; Chitose Ogawa; Noriko Tanabe; Kokichi Sugano; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Kenji Tamura; Teruhiko Yoshida; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Atsushi Ochiai; Noboru Yamamoto; Takashi Kohno
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  A comprehensive genomic pan-cancer classification using The Cancer Genome Atlas gene expression data.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Kai Kang; Juno M Krahn; Nicole Croutwater; Kevin Lee; David M Umbach; Leping Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Serum and urine metabolomics study reveals a distinct diagnostic model for cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Quan-Jun Yang; Jiang-Rong Zhao; Juan Hao; Bin Li; Yan Huo; Yong-Long Han; Li-Li Wan; Jie Li; Jinlu Huang; Jin Lu; Gen-Jin Yang; Cheng Guo
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  1 in total

1.  Integrative OMICS Data-Driven Procedure Using a Derivatized Meta-Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Karla Cervantes-Gracia; Richard Chahwan; Holger Husi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.599

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.