Literature DB >> 34236667

Deep Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Site Prediction.

Arian R Jamasb1,2, Ben Day1, Cătălina Cangea1, Pietro Liò1, Tom L Blundell3.   

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are central to cellular functions. Experimental methods for predicting PPIs are well developed but are time and resource expensive and suffer from high false-positive error rates at scale. Computational prediction of PPIs is highly desirable for a mechanistic understanding of cellular processes and offers the potential to identify highly selective drug targets. In this chapter, details of developing a deep learning approach to predicting which residues in a protein are involved in forming a PPI-a task known as PPI site prediction-are outlined. The key decisions to be made in defining a supervised machine learning project in this domain are here highlighted. Alternative training regimes for deep learning models to address shortcomings in existing approaches and provide starting points for further research are discussed. This chapter is written to serve as a companion to developing deep learning approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction, and an introduction to developing geometric deep learning projects operating on protein structure graphs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Geometric deep learning; Graph; Machine learning; Protein; Protein–protein interaction; Structural biology; Structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34236667     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1641-3_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  73 in total

1.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration.

Authors:  G Rigaut; A Shevchenko; B Rutz; M Wilm; M Mann; B Séraphin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Structural biology and drug discovery for protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Harry Jubb; Alicia P Higueruelo; Anja Winter; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Markus Bösche; Roland Krause; Paola Grandi; Martina Marzioch; Andreas Bauer; Jörg Schultz; Jens M Rick; Anne-Marie Michon; Cristina-Maria Cruciat; Marita Remor; Christian Höfert; Malgorzata Schelder; Miro Brajenovic; Heinz Ruffner; Alejandro Merino; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; David Dickson; Tatjana Rudi; Volker Gnau; Angela Bauch; Sonja Bastuck; Bettina Huhse; Christina Leutwein; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Richard R Copley; Angela Edelmann; Erich Querfurth; Vladimir Rybin; Gerard Drewes; Manfred Raida; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peer Bork; Bertrand Seraphin; Bernhard Kuster; Gitte Neubauer; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips.

Authors:  H Zhu; M Bilgin; R Bangham; D Hall; A Casamayor; P Bertone; N Lan; R Jansen; S Bidlingmaier; T Houfek; T Mitchell; P Miller; R A Dean; M Gerstein; M Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  COFACTOR: improved protein function prediction by combining structure, sequence and protein-protein interaction information.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; Peter L Freddolino; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome.

Authors:  T Ito; T Chiba; R Ozawa; M Yoshida; M Hattori; Y Sakaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.

Authors:  Qingzhen Hou; Marc F Lensink; Jaap Heringa; K Anton Feenstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  BioLiP: a semi-manually curated database for biologically relevant ligand-protein interactions.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Ambrish Roy; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases.

Authors:  Benjamin A Shoemaker; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Correcting for the study bias associated with protein-protein interaction measurements reveals differences between protein degree distributions from different cancer types.

Authors:  Martin H Schaefer; Luis Serrano; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Overview of methods for characterization and visualization of a protein-protein interaction network in a multi-omics integration context.

Authors:  Vivian Robin; Antoine Bodein; Marie-Pier Scott-Boyer; Mickaël Leclercq; Olivier Périn; Arnaud Droit
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 2.  Protein-protein interaction prediction with deep learning: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Farzan Soleymani; Eric Paquet; Herna Viktor; Wojtek Michalowski; Davide Spinello
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 6.155

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.