Literature DB >> 34236509

Plastome evolution in the Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae) and its application in phylogenomics and populations genetics.

Paulo Aecyo1, André Marques2, Bruno Huettel2, Ana Silva1, Tiago Esposito1, Elâine Ribeiro3,4, Inara R Leal3, Edeline Gagnon5, Gustavo Souza1, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand6.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: The chloroplast genomes of Caesalpinia group species are structurally conserved, but sequence level variation is useful for both phylogenomic and population genetic analyses. Variation in chloroplast genomes (plastomes) has been an important source of information in plant biology. The Caesalpinia group has been used as a model in studies correlating ecological and genomic variables, yet its intergeneric and infrageneric relationships are not fully solved, despite densely sampled phylogenies including nuclear and plastid loci by Sanger sequencing. Here, we present the de novo assembly and characterization of plastomes from 13 species from the Caesalpinia group belonging to eight genera. A comparative analysis was carried out with 13 other plastomes previously available, totalizing 26 plastomes and representing 15 of the 26 known Caesalpinia group genera. All plastomes showed a conserved quadripartite structure and gene repertoire, except for the loss of four ndh genes in Erythrostemon gilliesii. Thirty polymorphic regions were identified for inter- or intrageneric analyses. The 26 aligned plastomes were used for phylogenetic reconstruction, revealing a well-resolved topology, and dividing the Caesalpinia group into two fully supported clades. Sixteen microsatellite (cpSSR) loci were selected from Cenostigma microphyllum for primer development and at least two were cross-amplified in different Leguminosae subfamilies by in vitro or in silico approaches. Four loci were used to assess the genetic diversity of C. microphyllum in the Brazilian Caatinga. Our results demonstrate the structural conservation of plastomes in the Caesalpinia group, offering insights into its systematics and evolution, and provides new genomic tools for future phylogenetic, population genetics, and phylogeographic studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesalpinioideae; Cenostigma; Chloroplast genome; Genetic diversity; Seasonally tropical dry forest; cpSSR

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34236509     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-021-03655-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  45 in total

1.  Revisiting the phylogeny of papilionoid legumes: New insights from comprehensively sampled early-branching lineages.

Authors:  Domingos Cardoso; Luciano P de Queiroz; R Toby Pennington; Haroldo C de Lima; Emile Fonty; Martin F Wojciechowski; Matt Lavin
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Extensive gene tree discordance and hemiplasy shaped the genomes of North American columnar cacti.

Authors:  Dario Copetti; Alberto Búrquez; Enriquena Bustamante; Joseph L M Charboneau; Kevin L Childs; Luis E Eguiarte; Seunghee Lee; Tiffany L Liu; Michelle M McMahon; Noah K Whiteman; Rod A Wing; Martin F Wojciechowski; Michael J Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Extensive reorganization of the plastid genome of Trifolium subterraneum (Fabaceae) is associated with numerous repeated sequences and novel DNA insertions.

Authors:  Zhengqiu Cai; Mary Guisinger; Hyi-Gyung Kim; Elizabeth Ruck; John C Blazier; Vanity McMurtry; Jennifer V Kuehl; Jeffrey Boore; Robert K Jansen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Caught in action: fine-scale plastome evolution in the parasitic plants of Cuscuta section Ceratophorae (Convolvulaceae).

Authors:  Arjan Banerjee; Saša Stefanović
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding.

Authors:  Wenpan Dong; Jing Liu; Jing Yu; Ling Wang; Shiliang Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  ycf1, the most promising plastid DNA barcode of land plants.

Authors:  Wenpan Dong; Chao Xu; Changhao Li; Jiahui Sun; Yunjuan Zuo; Shuo Shi; Tao Cheng; Junjie Guo; Shiliang Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data.

Authors:  Nicolas Dierckxsens; Patrick Mardulyn; Guillaume Smits
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A Repertory of Rearrangements and the Loss of an Inverted Repeat Region in Passiflora Chloroplast Genomes.

Authors:  Luiz Augusto Cauz-Santos; Zirlane Portugal da Costa; Caroline Callot; Stéphane Cauet; Maria Imaculada Zucchi; Hélène Bergès; Cássio van den Berg; Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Plastid genome evolution across the genus Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae): two clades within subgenus Grammica exhibit extensive gene loss.

Authors:  Thomas Braukmann; Maria Kuzmina; Sasa Stefanovic
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Comparative analysis of complete plastid genomes from wild soybean (Glycine soja) and nine other Glycine species.

Authors:  Sajjad Asaf; Abdul Latif Khan; Muhammad Aaqil Khan; Qari Muhammad Imran; Sang-Mo Kang; Khdija Al-Hosni; Eun Ju Jeong; Ko Eun Lee; In-Jung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Highly Resolved Papilionoid Legume Phylogeny Based on Plastid Phylogenomics.

Authors:  In-Su Choi; Domingos Cardoso; Luciano P de Queiroz; Haroldo C de Lima; Chaehee Lee; Tracey A Ruhlman; Robert K Jansen; Martin F Wojciechowski
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Application of chloroplast genome in the identification of Traditional Chinese Medicine Viola philippica.

Authors:  Dong-Ling Cao; Xue-Jie Zhang; Shao-Qiu Xie; Shou-Jin Fan; Xiao-Jian Qu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.547

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.