| Literature DB >> 34235276 |
Annapurna Rai1, Rajniti Prasad1, B K Das1, Shampa Anupurba2, Utpal Kant Singh3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To observe the role of CSF Gene XPERT (CBNAAT) in diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and determine its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).Entities:
Keywords: CBNAAT; Cerebrospinal fluid; Gene XPERT; Sensitivity; Tuberculous meningitis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34235276 PMCID: PMC8250454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2021.100255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ISSN: 2405-5794
Basic characteristics of children with Tuberculous meningitis.
| Characteristics | No. of children (n = 55) | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| <5yrs | 14 | 25.4 |
| 5–10 yrs | 28 | 50.9 |
| 10–18 yrs | 13 | 23.7 |
| Fever | 43 | 78.1 |
| Headache | 37 | 67.2 |
| Seizure | 37 | 67.2 |
| Abnormal chest X-ray | 31 | 56.3 |
| Positive Neck rigidity and Kernig’s sign | 30 | 54.5 |
| Brudzinski sign | 26 | 47.3 |
| Vomiting | 28 | 50.9 |
| Papilledema | 26 | 47.3 |
| Cranial nerve palsy | 11 | 20 |
| Motor deficit | 26 | 47.3 |
| Hemiplegia | 16 | 29 |
| Paraplegia | 3 | 5.4 |
| Quadriplegia | 7 | 9.8 |
Fig. 1Cerebrospinal fluid analysis of children with Tuberculous meningitis.
| TLC (/micro liter) | 149.78 ± 26.5 |
| Neutrophils (%) | 33 ± 10.8 |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 55.11 ± 10.00 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 57.22 ± 14.7 |
| Protein (mg/dL) | 106.33 ± 28.4 |
| CBNAAT positive | 9(16.4%) |
| Rifampicin sensitive | 7(77.8%) |
| Rifampicin resistant | 2(22.2%) |
| CBNAAT negative | 46(83.7%) |
| MGIT culture positive | 15(27.3%) |
CSF CBNAAT was positive in 3, 5 and one cases of definite, probable and possible category of tuberculous meningitis.
CSF CBNAAT for diagnosis of Tuberculous meningitis in children.
| Sensitivity % | Specificity % | PPV % | NPV % | Diagnostic accuracy% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present Study | 40 | 92.5 | 66.78 | 80.4 | 78.2 |
| Vadvai et al. | 29 | – | – | – | – |
| Bhatia et al. | 38.24 | – | – | – | – |
| Ratageri et al. | 46.15 | 100 | --- | – | – |
| Solomon et al. | 26 | 100 | 100 | 53 | – |
| Banker et al. | 84.9 | 86.7 | 33.09 | 98.6 | 86.6 |
| Xiaocui et al. | 34 | 96 | 98.6 | 15.4 | – |