| Literature DB >> 34234536 |
Ibrahim M Gosadi1, Gassem A Gohal2, Alanoud E Dalak3, Anas A Alnami3, Norah A Aljabri3, Atyaf J Zurayyir3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Southern region of Saudi Arabia has one of the highest prevalence of sickle cell disease and thalassemia in the kingdom. This study aims to assess the factors associated with the rejection of premarital clinical counselling in the Jazan region.Entities:
Keywords: Saudi Arabia; counselling; premarital; screening; sickle cell; thalassemia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34234536 PMCID: PMC8256091 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S321046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Demographics of 413 Respondents from the Jazan Region Who, with Their Partners, Were Identified as High-Risk Couples and Proceeded with Their Marriages
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Gender: Frequency [%] | |
| Males | 155 [37.5%] |
| Females | 258 [62.5%] |
| Age: Mean [SD] | 33 [10.6] |
| Marital Status: Frequency [%] | |
| Married | 389 [96.4%] |
| Divorced | 8 [1.9%] |
| Widow | 5 [1.2%] |
| Other | 2 [0.5%] |
| Education Level: Frequency [%] | |
| No official education | 9 [2.2%] |
| Elementary | 32 [7.7%] |
| Intermediate | 20 [4.8%] |
| Secondary | 105 [25.4%] |
| Diploma/University | 223 [54%] |
| Postgraduate | 24 [5.8%] |
| Employment Status: Frequency [%] | |
| Student | 62 [15%] |
| Governmental employee | 122 [29.5%] |
| Military | 38 [9.2%] |
| Private sector employees | 35 [8.5%] |
| Housewife | 107 [25.9%] |
| Unemployed/retired | 49 [11.9%] |
Degree of Relationship, Prevalence and Family History of Hemoglobinopathies Among 413 Responding Parents from the Jazan Region with Offspring Affected by Hemoglobinopathies
| Variable | Frequency [%] |
|---|---|
| Degree of relationship between couple*: | |
| First degree cousins (paternal side) | 108 [26.4%] |
| First degree cousins (maternal side) | 68 [16.6%] |
| Second degree cousins | 37 [9%] |
| Related to the same tribe | 59 [14.4%] |
| No relationship | 137 [33.2%] |
| Disease identified among the participants | |
| Sickle cell disease (carrier) | 280 [67.8%] |
| Sickle cell disease (affected) | 66 [16%] |
| Thalassemia (carrier) | 58 [14%] |
| Thalassemia (affected) | 9 [2.2%] |
| Participants with family history of the same identified disease* | 273 [65.3%] |
Notes: *4 missing cases for degree of relationship, 1 missing case of family history of the same identified disease.
Opinions and Source of Information Concerning Hemoglobinopathies Among 413 Responding Parents from the Jazan Region with Offspring Affected by Hemoglobinopathies
| Variable | Frequency [%] |
|---|---|
| Opinions concerning hemoglobinopathies: | |
| Parents who would advise risky couples to proceed with marriage | 63 [15.3%] |
| Parents who believe that there is no association between consanguinity and the risk of inherited blood disorders | 62 [15%] |
| Parents who believe that inherited blood disorders are not prevalent in the Jazan region | 35 [8.7%] |
| Source of information about inherited blood disorders* | |
| Internet | 93 [22.5%] |
| Physicians /healthcare workers | 52 [13.3%] |
| From affected individuals | 7 [15.6%] |
| Books/ pamphlets/journals | 30 [7.2%] |
| During school/university studies | 9 [2.1%] |
| TV | 3 [0.7%] |
Note: *Participants were able to select more than one answer.
Opinions Regarding Premarital Counselling Among 192 Participants Who Attended Premarital Counselling in the Jazan Region
| Variables | Missing Cases | |
|---|---|---|
| Average duration of counselling session in minutes: median [minimum – maximum] | 10 [<1 – 66] | 15 |
| Was risk of transmitting diseases explained: Frequency [%] | 2 | |
| Yes | 162 [85.7%] | |
| No | 27 [14.3%] | |
| Were complications of disease explained:: Frequency [%] | 7 | |
| Yes | 131 [70.8%] | |
| No | 54 [29.2%] | |
| Was the physician able to answer your queries about inherited blood disorders: Frequency [%] | 11 | |
| Yes | 142 [78.5%] | |
| No | 39 [21.5%] | |
| What educational material was provided during counselling session*: Frequency [%] | 18 | |
| No supplementary materials were provided | 82 [47.1%] | |
| Video | 21 [12.1%] | |
| Booklets | 25 [14.4%] | |
| Pamphlets | 26 [14.9%] | |
| Posters | 20 [11.5%] | |
| Why did you refused the counselling advice and proceed with marriage*: Frequency [%] | 7 | |
| Refused because our marriage was unavoidable destiny | 100 [52%] | |
| Refused because the chance of transmission of inherited disease was small | 35 [18.2%] | |
| Refused because of the relationship between the couple | 29 [15.1%] | |
| Refused because financial marriage arrangements were completed before premarital test | 22 [7.8%] | |
| Refused because the counselling was not convincing | 14 [7.3%] | |
| Refused because inherited blood disorders do not affect children’s lives | 10 [5.2%] | |
| Refused counselling advice since I was in love with my fiancé | 9 [4.6%] | |
| Refused counselling advice due to pressure of my family | 7 [3.6%] | |
| Refused counselling advice to avoid being lonely | 7 [3.6%] | |
| Refused counselling advice due to not realising the seriousness of the inherited blood disorders | 3 [1.5%] | |
Note: *Parents were able to choose more than one answer.