Literature DB >> 34231053

A cross-sectional study of the relationship between CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variations and depression symptoms, for women taking SSRIs during pregnancy.

Catriona Hippman1, Caitlin Slomp1, Emily Morris1, Rolan Batallones1, Angela Inglis1, Prescilla Carrion1, Ursula Brain2, Michelle Higginson3, Galen E B Wright4, Lynda G Balneaves4, Deirdre Ryan1, Corey Nislow3, Colin J D Ross3, Andrea Gaedigk5, Tim F Oberlander2, Jehannine Austin6,7.   

Abstract

Depression during pregnancy affects 10-15% of women, and 5% of women take antidepressants during pregnancy. Clinical guidelines provide recommendations for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) drug choice and dose based on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype; however, they are based on evidence from non-pregnant cohorts. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that women with function-altering variants (increased, decreased, or no function) in these pharmacogenes, taking SSRIs prenatally, would have more depression symptoms than women whose pharmacogenetic variants are associated with normal SSRI metabolism. Comprehensive CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping using a range of methods, including gene copy number analysis, was performed as secondary analyses on two longitudinal cohorts of pregnant women (N = 83) taking the SSRIs paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, or sertraline. The Kruskal-Wallis test compared mean depression scores across four predicted metabolizer groups: poor (n = 5), intermediate (n = 10), normal (n = 53), and ultrarapid (n = 15). There were no significant differences between mean depression scores across the four metabolizer groups (H(3) = .73, p = .87, eta-squared = .029, epsilon-squared = .0089). This is the first study of the relationship in pregnancy between CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic variations and depression symptoms in the context of SSRI use. Findings from this initial study do not support the clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing for SSRI use during the second or third trimesters of pregnancy, but these findings should be confirmed in larger cohorts. There is an urgent need for further research to clarify the utility of pharmacogenetic testing for pregnant women, especially as companies offering direct-to-consumer genetic testing expand their marketing efforts.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; Pharmacogenetics; Pregnancy; SSRI; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34231053     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-021-01149-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  23 in total

1.  Prescription drug use in pregnancy: a retrospective, population-based study in British Columbia, Canada (2001-2006).

Authors:  Jamie R Daw; Barbara Mintzes; Michael R Law; Gillian E Hanley; Steven G Morgan
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 2.  Interethnic variation of CYP2C19 alleles, 'predicted' phenotypes and 'measured' metabolic phenotypes across world populations.

Authors:  I Fricke-Galindo; C Céspedes-Garro; F Rodrigues-Soares; M E G Naranjo; Á Delgado; F de Andrés; M López-López; E Peñas-Lledó; A LLerena
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 3.  Clinical validity of cytochrome P450 metabolism and serotonin gene variants in psychiatric pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  C Anthony Altar; John Hornberger; Ashwini Shewade; Victor Cruz; Jill Garrison; David Mrazek
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10

Review 4.  The effect of prenatal antidepressant exposure on neonatal adaptation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophie Grigoriadis; Emily H VonderPorten; Lana Mamisashvili; Allison Eady; George Tomlinson; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Gideon Koren; Meir Steiner; Patricia Mousmanis; Amy Cheung; Lori E Ross
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 5.  The impact of maternal depression during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophie Grigoriadis; Emily H VonderPorten; Lana Mamisashvili; George Tomlinson; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Gideon Koren; Meir Steiner; Patricia Mousmanis; Amy Cheung; Kim Radford; Jovana Martinovic; Lori E Ross
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Influence of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 gene variants on antidepressant response in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  E J Brandl; A K Tiwari; X Zhou; J Deluce; J L Kennedy; D J Müller; M A Richter
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Postpartum Hemorrhage and Use of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Kate Smolina; Barbara Mintzes; Tim F Oberlander; Steven G Morgan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Pharmacotherapy for mood disorders in pregnancy: a review of pharmacokinetic changes and clinical recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Kristina M Deligiannidis; Nancy Byatt; Marlene P Freeman
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.153

9.  Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  J L Cox; J M Holden; R Sagovsky
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Patterns of psychotropic medicine use in pregnancy in the United States from 2006 to 2011 among women with private insurance.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Barbara Mintzes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.