Stefan Gress1. 1. , Salvatorstrasse 3, 80333, Munich, Germany. stefan.gress@plast-chirurgie.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Labia minora reduction has become part of the treatment spectrum offered by most plastic surgeons. The author has performed many corrective procedures involving the outer female genital region, most of which involved reducing the labia minora of approximately 4300 women. Over the years, the number of corrective procedures to rectify poorly performed initial operations increased significantly at the author's practice. The most common iatrogenic deformity is the overresection of the labia minora below the clitoris, leaving behind excess tissue in the area around and above the clitoral hood (small penis deformity). METHODS: Two basic procedures may be used to reconstruct the labia minora below the clitoris: reconstructing the labia minora by redundant labial tissue above the clitoris to form bilateral preputial flaps being rotated downward into the defect and reconstructing the labia minora by vaginal skin advancement. Other reconstructions depend on the deformity itself. The postoperative outcome was assessed in an anonymous questionnaire answered by 544 patients. RESULTS: The outcome showed a significant improvement in functional and psychological impairment as a result of the deformities caused by the initial operation. Even if the reconstruction of the labia minora did not produce the desired initial result, overall satisfaction with the corrective surgery was very satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The increase of iatrogenic deformities after the initial labia reductions is alarming. The causes of this growth are manifold: underestimation of the procedure, misjudgment and a lack of detailed knowledge. This has a heavy psychological and physical impact on patients. Reconstruction of excessively shortened labia minora is often not easy and not always satisfactory. Training and the establishment of surgical standards should be used to avoid errors and achieve the best result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BACKGROUND: Labia minora reduction has become part of the treatment spectrum offered by most plastic surgeons. The author has performed many corrective procedures involving the outer female genital region, most of which involved reducing the labia minora of approximately 4300 women. Over the years, the number of corrective procedures to rectify poorly performed initial operations increased significantly at the author's practice. The most common iatrogenic deformity is the overresection of the labia minora below the clitoris, leaving behind excess tissue in the area around and above the clitoral hood (small penis deformity). METHODS: Two basic procedures may be used to reconstruct the labia minora below the clitoris: reconstructing the labia minora by redundant labial tissue above the clitoris to form bilateral preputial flaps being rotated downward into the defect and reconstructing the labia minora by vaginal skin advancement. Other reconstructions depend on the deformity itself. The postoperative outcome was assessed in an anonymous questionnaire answered by 544 patients. RESULTS: The outcome showed a significant improvement in functional and psychological impairment as a result of the deformities caused by the initial operation. Even if the reconstruction of the labia minora did not produce the desired initial result, overall satisfaction with the corrective surgery was very satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The increase of iatrogenic deformities after the initial labia reductions is alarming. The causes of this growth are manifold: underestimation of the procedure, misjudgment and a lack of detailed knowledge. This has a heavy psychological and physical impact on patients. Reconstruction of excessively shortened labia minora is often not easy and not always satisfactory. Training and the establishment of surgical standards should be used to avoid errors and achieve the best result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .