Literature DB >> 34230597

Impact of surgical resection of butterfly glioblastoma on survival: a meta-analysis based on comparative studies.

Rafał Chojak1, Marta Koźba-Gosztyła2, Katarzyna Słychan3, Daniel Gajos3, Marek Kotas3, Michał Tyliszczak3, Bogdan Czapiga2,4.   

Abstract

Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a rare brain tumor that invades both hemispheres by crossing the corpus callosum. bGBM is associated with a dismal prognosis with a median survival time of a few months. Surgical resection is a rare treatment option due to the unfavorable location and assumed poor risk-to-benefit ratio. Therefore, a biopsy-alone approach is considered the main treatment option. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate whether resection of bGBM is associated with improved overall survival compared with biopsy alone. We searched three databases to find studies that compare resection with biopsy in 6-, 12- and 18-months overall survival in patients with bGBM. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) of mortality using a random-effects model. Five studies with 194 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Mortality was decreased for resection compared with biopsy at 6-months (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.44-0.91]). No significant differences in overall survival were found at 12 (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.50-1.14]) and 18-months (RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.56-1.26]). Surgical resection of bGBM is associated with an improved 6-months overall survival compared with biopsy alone. We have not found strong evidence supporting the superiority of resection over biopsy alone in overall survival at 12 and 18-months.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34230597     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93441-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  31 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

2.  Butterfly glioblastomas: a retrospective review and qualitative assessment of outcomes.

Authors:  Kristine Dziurzynski; David Blas-Boria; Dima Suki; Daniel P Cahill; Sujit S Prabhu; Vinay Puduvalli; Nicholas Levine
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

4.  Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Conan So; M Minhaj Siddiqui
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

6.  Surgical Resection of Anterior and Posterior Butterfly Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Opoku-Darko; Joseph E Amuah; John J P Kelly
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Martin van den Bent; Kirsten Hopkins; Jörg C Tonn; Roger Stupp; Andrea Falini; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal; Didier Frappaz; Roger Henriksson; Carmen Balana; Olivier Chinot; Zvi Ram; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method.

Authors:  Joanna IntHout; John P A Ioannidis; George F Borm
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Benefits of glioma resection in the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Marie-Therese Forster; Marion Behrens; Irina Lortz; Nadine Conradi; Christian Senft; Martin Voss; Maximilian Rauch; Volker Seifert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Surgery for IDH1/2 wild-type glioma invading the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Pamela Franco; Daniel Delev; Debora Cipriani; Nicolas Neidert; Elias Kellner; Waseem Masalha; Bianca Mercas; Irina Mader; Peter Reinacher; Astrid Weyerbrock; Christian Fung; Jürgen Beck; Dieter Henrik Heiland; Oliver Schnell
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.816

View more
  4 in total

1.  Endoscopic-assisted surgical approach for butterfly glioma surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas B Dadario; Ashraf Zaman; Madhavi Pandya; Brian J Dlouhy; Manuri P Gunawardena; Michael E Sughrue; Charles Teo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Optimizing management of the elderly patient with glioblastoma: Survival prediction online tool based on BC Cancer Registry real-world data.

Authors:  Rachel Zhao; Jonathan Zeng; Kimberly DeVries; Ryan Proulx; Andra Valentina Krauze
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 3.  Gliomas Infiltrating the Corpus Callosum: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Paolo Palmisciano; Gianluca Ferini; Gina Watanabe; Christian Ogasawara; Emal Lesha; Othman Bin-Alamer; Giuseppe E Umana; Kenny Yu; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Ali S Haider
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Surgery vs. Biopsy in the Treatment of Butterfly Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shreya Chawla; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Alessandro Boaro; Rasika Korde; Sofia Amaral Medeiros; Heba Edrees; Elisabetta Mezzalira; Francesco Sala; Rania A Mekary; Timothy R Smith
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.