Literature DB >> 34230564

Human biomarkers associated with low concentrations of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in groundwater in agricultural areas of Thailand.

Pokkate Wongsasuluk1,2,3, Srilert Chotpantarat4,5,6,7, Wattasit Siriwong3,8, Mark Robson8,9,10.   

Abstract

Human biomarkers were used to evaluate the lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) exposure of local people who lived in an agricultural area with intense agrochemical usage and who consumed groundwater. Although the heavy metals/metalloids in the groundwater were at low concentrations, they could cause adverse effects due to a high daily water intake rate over the long term. Biomarkers (hair, fingernails and urine) were collected from 100 subjects along with the local shallow groundwater and tap water, which is the treated deep groundwater, and investigated for the concentrations of As and Pb. Shallow groundwater had an average pH of 5.21 ± 1.90, ranging from 3.77 to 8.34, with average concentrations of As and Pb of 1.311 µg/L and 6.882 µg/L, respectively. Tap water had an average pH of 5.24 ± 1.63, ranging from 3.86 to 8.89, with the average concentrations of As and Pb of 0.77 µg/L and 0.004 µg/L, respectively. The levels of both As and Pb in the hair, fingernails and urine of shallow groundwater-consuming residents were greater than those in the hair, fingernails and urine of tap water-consuming residents. Interestingly, the As level in urine showed a linear relationship with the As concentration in groundwater (R2 = 0.91). The average water consumption rate was approximately two-fold higher than the standard; thus, its consumption posed a health risk even at the low As and Pb levels in the groundwater. The hazard index (HI) ranged from 0.01 to 16.34 (average of 1.20 ± 2.50), which was higher than the acceptable level. Finally, the concomitant factors for As and Pb in the urine, hair and nails from both binary logistic regression and odds ratio (OR) analysis indicated that groundwater consumption was the major concomitant risk factor. This study suggested that direct consumption of this groundwater should be avoided and that the groundwater should be treated, especially before consumption. In conclusion, urine is suggested to be a biomarker of daily exposure to As and Pb, while for long-term exposure to these metals, fingernails are suggested as a better biomarker than hair.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34230564     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93337-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  32 in total

1.  Biological and behavioral factors modify biomarkers of arsenic exposure in a U.S. population.

Authors:  Rebecca L Calderon; Edward E Hudgens; Cara Carty; Bin He; X Chris Le; John Rogers; David J Thomas
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Exposure to metals from orthodontic appliances by hair mineral analysis.

Authors:  Marcin Mikulewicz; Katarzyna Chojnacka; Agnieszka Zielińska; Izabela Michalak
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 3.  What is the best biomarker to assess arsenic exposure via drinking water?

Authors:  Nathalie Marchiset-Ferlay; Chantal Savanovitch; Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Using hair and fingernails in binary logistic regression for bio-monitoring of heavy metals/metalloid in groundwater in intensively agricultural areas, Thailand.

Authors:  Pokkate Wongsasuluk; Srilert Chotpantarat; Wattasit Siriwong; Mark Robson
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Mechanisms of arsenic contamination associated with hydrochemical characteristics in coastal alluvial aquifers using multivariate statistical technique and hydrogeochemical modeling: a case study in Rayong province, eastern Thailand.

Authors:  Satika Boonkaewwan; Prinpida Sonthiphand; Srilert Chotpantarat
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Effects of Arsenic and Iron on the Community and Abundance of Arsenite-Oxidizing Bacteria in an Arsenic-Affected Groundwater Aquifer.

Authors:  Phurinat Pipattanajaroenkul; Srilert Chotpantarat; Teerasit Termsaithong; Prinpida Sonthiphand
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 7.  Validity of human nails as a biomarker of arsenic and selenium exposure: A review.

Authors:  Melissa J Slotnick; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Environmental risk assessment of arsenic and fluoride in the Chaco Province, Argentina: research advances.

Authors:  Edgar E Buchhamer; Patricia S Blanes; Rosa M Osicka; M Cecilia Giménez
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

9.  Heavy metal contamination and human health risk assessment in drinking water from shallow groundwater wells in an agricultural area in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand.

Authors:  Pokkate Wongsasuluk; Srilert Chotpantarat; Wattasit Siriwong; Mark Robson
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Microbial community structure in aquifers associated with arsenic: analysis of 16S rRNA and arsenite oxidase genes.

Authors:  Prinpida Sonthiphand; Pasunun Rattanaroongrot; Kasarnchon Mek-Yong; Kanthida Kusonmano; Chalida Rangsiwutisak; Pichahpuk Uthaipaisanwong; Srilert Chotpantarat; Teerasit Termsaithong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Heavy metal ion concentration in the amniotic fluid of preterm and term pregnancies from two cities with different industrial output.

Authors:  Radu Ionut Neamtu; Marius Craina; George Dahma; Alin Viorel Popescu; Adelina Geanina Erimescu; Ioana Citu; Amadeus Dobrescu; Florin George Horhat; Dan Dumitru Vulcanescu; Florin Gorun; Elena Silvia Bernad; Andrei Motoc; Ioan Cosmin Citu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.