Literature DB >> 34230562

A multicenter, hospital-based and non-inferiority study for diagnostic efficacy of automated whole breast ultrasound for breast cancer in China.

Yujing Xin1, Xinyuan Zhang1, Yi Yang1, Yi Chen1,2, Yanan Wang1, Xiang Zhou3, Youlin Qiao1,4.   

Abstract

This study is the first multi-center non-inferiority study that aims to critically evaluate the effectiveness of HHUS/ABUS in China breast cancer detection. This was a multicenter hospital-based study. Five hospitals participated in this study. Women (30-69 years old) with defined criteria were invited for breast examination by HHUS, ABUS or/and mammography. For BI-RADS category 3, an additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test was provided to distinguish the true negative results from false negative results. For women classified as BI-RADS category 4 or 5, either core aspiration biopsy or surgical biopsy was done to confirm the diagnosis. Between February 2016 and March 2017, 2844 women signed the informed consent form, and 1947 of them involved in final analysis (680 were 30 to 39 years old, 1267 were 40 to 69 years old).For all participants, ABUS sensitivity (91.81%) compared with HHUS sensitivity (94.70%) with non-inferior Z tests, P = 0.015. In the 40-69 age group, non-inferior Z tests showed that ABUS sensitivity (93.01%) was non-inferior to MG sensitivity (86.02%) with P < 0.001 and HHUS sensitivity (95.44%) was non-inferior to MG sensitivity (86.02%) with P < 0.001. Sensitivity of ABUS and HHUS are all superior to that of MG with P < 0.001 by superior test.For all participants, ABUS specificity (92.89%) was non-inferior to HHUS specificity (89.36%) with P < 0.001. Superiority test show that specificity of ABUS was superior to that of HHUS with P < 0.001. In the 40-69 age group, ABUS specificity (92.86%) was non-inferior to MG specificity (91.68%) with P < 0.001 and HHUS specificity (89.55%) was non-inferior to MG specificity (91.68%) with P < 0.001. ABUS is not superior to MG with P = 0.114 by superior test. The sensitivity of ABUS/HHUS is superior to that of MG. The specificity of ABUS/HHUS is non-inferior to that of MG. In China, for an experienced US radiologist, both HHUS and ABUS have better diagnostic efficacy than MG in symptomatic individuals.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34230562     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93350-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  1 in total

1.  Association between mammographic breast density and lifestyle in Japanese women.

Authors:  Setsuko Ishihara; Naruto Taira; Kensuke Kawasaki; Youichi Ishibe; Taeko Mizoo; Keiko Nishiyama; Takayuki Iwamoto; Tomohiro Nogami; Takayuki Motoki; Tadahiko Shien; Junji Matsuoka; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Yoshifumi Komoike; Shuhei Sato; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.892

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  BUSnet: A Deep Learning Model of Breast Tumor Lesion Detection for Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Yujie Li; Hong Gu; Hongyu Wang; Pan Qin; Jia Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Diagnostic performance and image quality of low-tube voltage and low-contrast medium dose protocol with hybrid iterative reconstruction for hepatic dynamic CT.

Authors:  Shintaro Ichikawa; Utaroh Motosugi; Tatsuya Shimizu; Marie Luise Kromrey; Yoshihito Aikawa; Daiki Tamada; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.