Literature DB >> 34230459

Efficient and precise generation of Tay-Sachs disease model in rabbit by prime editing system.

Yuqiang Qian1, Ding Zhao1, Tingting Sui1, Mao Chen1, Zhiquan Liu1, Hongmei Liu1, Tao Zhang1, Siyu Chen1, Liangxue Lai2,3, Zhanjun Li4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34230459      PMCID: PMC8260710          DOI: 10.1038/s41421-021-00276-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Discov        ISSN: 2056-5968            Impact factor:   10.849


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Tay–Sachs disease (TSD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder due to an autosomal recessively inherited deficiency of β-hexosaminidase A (HexA)[1]. The four-bases (TATC) insertion in exon 11 of the HEXA (HEXA ins TATC) accounts for 80% of Tay–Sachs disease from the Ashkenazi Jewish population[2]. However, no typical clinical phenotypes, such as neurological abnormalities, the restricted pattern of distribution of GM2-ganglioside and membranous cytoplasmic bodies in the brain, were observed in HEXA−/− mouse models, due to the difference in the ganglioside degradation pathways in mice and human[3]. Thus, it is desired to generate an ideal animal model to accurately mimic HEXA ins TATC in TSD patients. CRISPR–Cas9 system-mediated HDR[4] has been used to generate the mutation of HEXA ins TATC, however, low efficiency and high indels impede its application. Recently Anzalone et al.[5] described a “search-and-replace” genome editing technology named prime editing (PE) that mediates 12 possible base-to-base conversions, without requiring DSBs or donor DNA templates in human cells. In addition, a previous study showed that, compared to mice, the late onset of TSD in adult rabbits[6] shared more similarities with human regarding physiology, anatomy, and genetics[7]. Thus, we generated a novel TSD rabbit model using the PE system, and characterized the typical phenotype of muscle weakness, ataxia, and mental disorders in the HEXA ins TATC rabbit model. We first validated the editing efficiencies of PEs (PE2, PE3, PE3b) in HEK293FT cells at fifteen loci: five loci for base insertion, eight loci for base substitutions, and two loci for base deletion (Supplementary Table S1). Sanger sequencing results showed that the base insertion at a frequency from 4% to 22% (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S2), the base substitutions at a frequency from 4% to 36%, and the base deletion at a frequency from 7% to 12% were determined using PEs (Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2), respectively. These results indicate that PEs were effective in generating base insertion, substitution, and deletion in HEK293FT cells.
Fig. 1

PE induced efficient and precise gene editing in rabbit.

a The base insertion efficiency of PE system in HEK293FT cells. b PE induced efficient and precise gene editing in rabbit embryos. c Editing frequency (HEXA ins TATC) of PegRNA screening with PBS length (8–16 nt) in rabbit embryos. d Editing frequency (HEXA ins TATC) of PegRNA screening with RT template length (10–18 nt) in rabbit embryos. e Editing frequency (HEXA ins TATC) of CRISPR–Cas9 system-mediated HDR compare with PE3. f The target sequence at HEXA locus by PE system. The PAM and sgRNA target sequences are shown in green and black, target mutation (red), frameshift mutation leads to PTC mutation (red and red star). g Editing frequency determination of HEXA ins TATC rabbit by deep sequencing. h Expression of HEXA gene was determined by qRT-PCR. i HEXA protein was determined by western blot. j X-ray radiography of WT and HEXA ins TATC rabbits. Red circle, increased cervical lordosis; Red arrows, clasping of the limbs. k Masson’s trichrome staining of gastrocnemius from WT and HEXA ins TATC rabbits. Blue arrow highlights the myopathy with fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. l HE staining of hippocampus from WT and HEXA heterozygous rabbits. The red arrow highlights the enlargement of perineural space.

PE induced efficient and precise gene editing in rabbit.

a The base insertion efficiency of PE system in HEK293FT cells. b PE induced efficient and precise gene editing in rabbit embryos. c Editing frequency (HEXA ins TATC) of PegRNA screening with PBS length (8–16 nt) in rabbit embryos. d Editing frequency (HEXA ins TATC) of PegRNA screening with RT template length (10–18 nt) in rabbit embryos. e Editing frequency (HEXA ins TATC) of CRISPR–Cas9 system-mediated HDR compare with PE3. f The target sequence at HEXA locus by PE system. The PAM and sgRNA target sequences are shown in green and black, target mutation (red), frameshift mutation leads to PTC mutation (red and red star). g Editing frequency determination of HEXA ins TATC rabbit by deep sequencing. h Expression of HEXA gene was determined by qRT-PCR. i HEXA protein was determined by western blot. j X-ray radiography of WT and HEXA ins TATC rabbits. Red circle, increased cervical lordosis; Red arrows, clasping of the limbs. k Masson’s trichrome staining of gastrocnemius from WT and HEXA ins TATC rabbits. Blue arrow highlights the myopathy with fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. l HE staining of hippocampus from WT and HEXA heterozygous rabbits. The red arrow highlights the enlargement of perineural space. Next, we tested the efficiency of the PE system in rabbit embryos at three gene loci of HEXA, HBB, and TYR, which are associated with clinical diseases in ClinVar data[8] (Supplementary Table S2). Sanger sequencing results showed that 9 of 20 desired HEXA ins TATC were determined using PE2 with the efficiency of 4.1%–15.4%, while the efficiency is 8%–37.5% using PE3. In addition, 1 of 14 desired HBB with an efficiency of 10% and 1 of 10 desired TYR with an efficiency of 14% were generated using PE3, while there is no desired mutation was detected for these two sites using PE2 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. S3). We then targeted the HEXA ins TATC to test the efficiency of the PegRNA PBS length (8–16 nt) and RT template length (10–18 nt) in rabbit embryos. TIDE analyzing[9] revealed significantly higher editing efficiencies by using PegRNA with 12 nt PBS and 14 nt RT template (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Table S3). Additionally, the significantly increased undesired indels were determined by using CRISPR–Cas9 system-mediated HDR (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Tables S3, S8), which is consistent with the previous study[4]. Thus, PE3 with 12 nt PBS and 14 nt RT template was used for the generation of HEXA ins TATC rabbits in the following study. The HEXA ins TATC introduces a premature termination codon (PTC) in exon 11, which leads to deficient activity of the hexosaminidase A (HexA)[10] (Fig. 1f). In this study, 2 of 4 HEXA ins TATC rabbits were determined using Sanger sequencing and targeted deep sequencing, with the 68.17% and 14.23% mutation efficiency for #1 and #2 pups, respectively (Fig. 1g). Furthermore, no sgRNA sequence-depended off-target mutations in HEXA ins TATC rabbits were found by deep sequencing (Supplementary Fig. S4a, b), suggesting the accuracy of PE system-mediated HEXA ins TATC mutations in rabbits. Furthermore, the heritability of HEXA ins TATC in rabbits was determined by Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Fig. S5), qRT-PCR (Fig. 1h), and western blot (Fig. 1i). The results showed a significantly reduced HEXA in HEXA ins TATC rabbits compared with WT controls. The typical phenotypes of the increasingly frequent of head raising, convulsions (Supplementary Fig. S6a and Movies S1, S2), abnormal gait with decreased sway length (Supplementary Fig. S6b and Movies S1, S2), clasping of the limbs, and increased cervical lordosis (Fig. 1j), muscle fibrosis (Fig. 1k) and enlargement of perineural space (Fig. 1l) were also determined in HEXA ins TATC rabbits when compared with WT controls. These phenotypes were similar with late-onset or chronic adult gangliosiderosis in TSD patient exhibiting as limb-girdle weakness, followed by the development of ataxia and progressive neuromuscular weakness[11]. In summary, this study for the first time verified the feasibility of PE system-mediated base insertions, deletions, and conversions in rabbit. This ideal and novel HEXA ins TATC rabbit model would be beneficial for the pathogenic mechanism study and drug screening to treat TSD in the future. supplymentary data Supplementary Movie S1 Supplementary Movie S2
  11 in total

1.  Molecular genetics of the beta-hexosaminidase isoenzymes: an introduction.

Authors:  E H Kolodny
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.944

2.  GM2 gangliosidosis in an adult pet rabbit.

Authors:  T Rickmeyer; S Schöniger; A Petermann; K Harzer; B Kustermann-Kuhn; H Fuhrmann; H-A Schoon
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.311

3.  The major defect in Ashkenazi Jews with Tay-Sachs disease is an insertion in the gene for the alpha-chain of beta-hexosaminidase.

Authors:  R Myerowitz; F C Costigan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Origin and spread of the 1278insTATC mutation causing Tay-Sachs disease in Ashkenazi Jews: genetic drift as a robust and parsimonious hypothesis.

Authors:  Amos Frisch; Roberto Colombo; Elena Michaelovsky; Mazal Karpati; Boleslaw Goldman; Leah Peleg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Dramatically different phenotypes in mouse models of human Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases.

Authors:  D Phaneuf; N Wakamatsu; J Q Huang; A Borowski; A C Peterson; S R Fortunato; G Ritter; S A Igdoura; C R Morales; G Benoit; B R Akerman; D Leclerc; N Hanai; J D Marth; J M Trasler; R A Gravel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  The democratization of gene editing: Insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Maria Jasin; James E Haber
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-12

7.  An inducible mouse model of late onset Tay-Sachs disease.

Authors:  Mylvaganam Jeyakumar; David Smith; Elena Eliott-Smith; Mario Cortina-Borja; Gabriele Reinkensmeier; Terry D Butters; Thorsten Lemm; Konrad Sandhoff; V Hugh Perry; Raymond A Dwek; Frances M Platt
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants.

Authors:  Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; Mark Benson; Garth Brown; Chen Chao; Shanmuga Chitipiralla; Baoshan Gu; Jennifer Hart; Douglas Hoffman; Jeffrey Hoover; Wonhee Jang; Kenneth Katz; Michael Ovetsky; George Riley; Amanjeev Sethi; Ray Tully; Ricardo Villamarin-Salomon; Wendy Rubinstein; Donna R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Peyton B Randolph; Jessie R Davis; Alexander A Sousa; Luke W Koblan; Jonathan M Levy; Peter J Chen; Christopher Wilson; Gregory A Newby; Aditya Raguram; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition.

Authors:  Eva K Brinkman; Tao Chen; Mario Amendola; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jordan L Doman; Alexander A Sousa; Peyton B Randolph; Peter J Chen; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 17.021

2.  An engineered prime editor with enhanced editing efficiency in plants.

Authors:  Yuan Zong; Yijing Liu; Chenxiao Xue; Boshu Li; Xiangyang Li; Yanpeng Wang; Ji Li; Guanwen Liu; Xingxu Huang; Xiaofeng Cao; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 68.164

Review 3.  Prime Editing: An All-Rounder for Genome Editing.

Authors:  Chenyu Lu; Jingyu Kuang; Tong Shao; Sisi Xie; Ming Li; Lingyun Zhu; Lvyun Zhu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.