Chang Lim Hyun1, Sung Joon Park1, Hye Sung Kim1, Hyun Joo Song2, Heung Up Kim2, Cheol Lee3, Dong Hui Lee1, Young Hee Maeng1, Young Sil Kim1, Bogun Jang4. 1. Department of Pathology, Jeju National University School of Medicine and Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine and Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Pathology, Jeju National University School of Medicine and Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea; Bgjang9633@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: SPARC-related modular calcium-binding protein 2 (SMOC2), a secreted matricellular protein, is reported to be involved in cancer progression such as cell cycle, angiogenesis, and invasion. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression of SMOC2 in various gastric lesions and assessed its prognostic value in a large cohort of gastric cancer (GC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SMOC2 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR using 26 matched fresh-frozen GC samples. SMOC2 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays including 734 GC specimens and its correlations with clinicopathological features and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The transcription level of SMOC2 was higher in GC samples compared to normal mucosa (p=0.006). Its expression levels were associated with the intestinal stem cell (ISC) marker, LGR5, but there were no correlations with EPHB2 and OLFM4 or the candidate cancer stem cell markers CD133 and CD44. SMOC2 expression was significantly increased in the intestinal metaplasia and was further increased in gastric adenomas and early gastric cancers (EGC). In total, 34% of GCs were positive for SMOC2, and SMOC2 positivity was higher in old (p=0.001) and male (p<0.001) patients, and in well-differentiated GC (p<0.001). SMOC2 expression had a negative association with perineural invasion (p<0.001) and tumor stage (p<0.001). In survival analysis, SMOC2-positive GC patients had much better clinical outcomes in overall survival rates (p<0.001) compared to SMOC2-negative GC patients. The prognostic impact of SMOC2 remained significant both in intestinal (p<0.001) and diffuse-type GC (p<0.001). Remarkably, a multivariate analysis demonstrated SMOC2 as an independent prognostic marker [hazard ratio (HR)=0.732, p=0.045] along with venous invasion (p=0.012), tumor stage (p<0.001) and CDX2 (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SMOC2 can be a prognostic marker for better clinical outcomes in GC.
BACKGROUND/AIM: SPARC-related modular calcium-binding protein 2 (SMOC2), a secreted matricellular protein, is reported to be involved in cancer progression such as cell cycle, angiogenesis, and invasion. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression of SMOC2 in various gastric lesions and assessed its prognostic value in a large cohort of gastric cancer (GC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SMOC2 mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR using 26 matched fresh-frozen GC samples. SMOC2 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays including 734 GC specimens and its correlations with clinicopathological features and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The transcription level of SMOC2 was higher in GC samples compared to normal mucosa (p=0.006). Its expression levels were associated with the intestinal stem cell (ISC) marker, LGR5, but there were no correlations with EPHB2 and OLFM4 or the candidate cancer stem cell markers CD133 and CD44. SMOC2 expression was significantly increased in the intestinal metaplasia and was further increased in gastric adenomas and early gastric cancers (EGC). In total, 34% of GCs were positive for SMOC2, and SMOC2 positivity was higher in old (p=0.001) and male (p<0.001) patients, and in well-differentiated GC (p<0.001). SMOC2 expression had a negative association with perineural invasion (p<0.001) and tumor stage (p<0.001). In survival analysis, SMOC2-positive GC patients had much better clinical outcomes in overall survival rates (p<0.001) compared to SMOC2-negative GC patients. The prognostic impact of SMOC2 remained significant both in intestinal (p<0.001) and diffuse-type GC (p<0.001). Remarkably, a multivariate analysis demonstrated SMOC2 as an independent prognostic marker [hazard ratio (HR)=0.732, p=0.045] along with venous invasion (p=0.012), tumor stage (p<0.001) and CDX2 (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that SMOC2 can be a prognostic marker for better clinical outcomes in GC.