Ido Alon1, Jaime Pinilla2. 1. Department of Development Economics, Research Group on Economics and Management of Innovation, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Idoalon77@gmail.com. 2. Department of Quantitative Methods in Economics, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION: We analyzed two questions. First, the effectiveness of public Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in Spain compared with private ones, measured by the time since initiating ART treatment until achieving pregnancy, accounting for age and socioeconomic factors. Second, socioeconomic determinants of access to ART, referring primarily to financial means derived by employment, income, and wealth. DESIGN: We applied statistical models on data extracted from the national Spanish Fertility Survey from 2018. The first topic was analyzed by competing risk survival analysis conducted on a sample of 667 women who initiate ART treatment since 2000. The second, by a Bivariate Probit model conducted on a sample of 672 women older than 41 years who required ART services. RESULTS: The first analysis raised that throughout the treatment, patients treated exclusively in private clinics had on average a higher cumulative incidence of becoming pregnant compared with patients who approached public clinics. The second analysis raised that both higher household equivalent income and higher education increase the likelihood of accessing ART in a private clinic and decrease the tendency of accessing public clinics or failing to access any service. Moreover, being single decreases the likelihood of accessing public clinics or ART services in general. CONCLUSIONS: Long waiting periods could be the main reason for the lower incidence of getting pregnant in public healthcare, explaining why patients choose private over public care. We develop a broader discussion over the extent of Spanish public funding of ART, the unequal medical outcome, and potential options for optimization.
RESEARCH QUESTION: We analyzed two questions. First, the effectiveness of public Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in Spain compared with private ones, measured by the time since initiating ART treatment until achieving pregnancy, accounting for age and socioeconomic factors. Second, socioeconomic determinants of access to ART, referring primarily to financial means derived by employment, income, and wealth. DESIGN: We applied statistical models on data extracted from the national Spanish Fertility Survey from 2018. The first topic was analyzed by competing risk survival analysis conducted on a sample of 667 women who initiate ART treatment since 2000. The second, by a Bivariate Probit model conducted on a sample of 672 women older than 41 years who required ART services. RESULTS: The first analysis raised that throughout the treatment, patients treated exclusively in private clinics had on average a higher cumulative incidence of becoming pregnant compared with patients who approached public clinics. The second analysis raised that both higher household equivalent income and higher education increase the likelihood of accessing ART in a private clinic and decrease the tendency of accessing public clinics or failing to access any service. Moreover, being single decreases the likelihood of accessing public clinics or ART services in general. CONCLUSIONS: Long waiting periods could be the main reason for the lower incidence of getting pregnant in public healthcare, explaining why patients choose private over public care. We develop a broader discussion over the extent of Spanish public funding of ART, the unequal medical outcome, and potential options for optimization.
Authors: José Luis Navarro Espigares; Luis Martínez Navarro; José Antonio Castilla Alcalá; Elisa Hernández Torres Journal: Gac Sanit Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.139
Authors: Michael L Eisenberg; James F Smith; Susan G Millstein; Robert D Nachtigall; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Patricia P Katz Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Georgina M Chambers; Van Phuong Hoang; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Michael G Chapman; Osamu Ishihara; Fernando Zegers-Hochschild; Karl G Nygren; G David Adamson Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Georgina M Chambers; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Osamu Ishihara; Michael G Chapman; G David Adamson Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 7.329