Literature DB >> 34228979

CASE-based and Guidelines-based Lectures are the Most Preferred Form of Online Webinar Education: Results from the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics Series (COViD).

Yi Li1, Claire de la Calle1, Carissa Chu1, Caitlin Baussan1, Lindsay A Hampson2.   

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the most preferred style of online didactic lectures. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on surgical resident education, instigating a major shift towards online webinar didactics as a major of resident teaching. We hypothesize that a case-based format of online didactics are the most preferred format for this style of lecture. Study Design We analyzed viewer evaluations following 82 online hour-long lectures in the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics Lecture Series. We categorized each lecture as case-based, guidelines-based, practice updates, or surgical technique-based and assessed viewer responses to survey questions regarding subject area relevance, lecturer knowledgeability, lecturer effectiveness, and usefulness to learning. We performed logistic regression to control for viewer level, instructor level, and lecture topic, and using surgical technique-based lectures as the baseline variable. Results 2176 evaluations were analyzed. Case-based, guidelines-based and practice updates were all scored significantly higher than surgical technique for subject area relevance. Case-based and guideline-based lectures scored significantly higher for usefulness to learning. Case-based lectures scored significantly higher for lecturer effectiveness. There was no significant difference in scoring between any lecture style when rated on lecturer knowledgeability. Conclusion When preparing online webinar based didactics for surgical resident education, case-based lecturers appear to be the most preferred and well received lecture style, followed closely by guidelines-based lectures. Practice updates and surgical technique-based lectures are less preferred formats for this teaching modality.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34228979     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Deferred radical prostatectomy in patients who initially elected for active surveillance: a multi-institutional, prospective, observational cohort of the PRIAS-JAPAN study.

Authors:  Yoichiro Tohi; Takuma Kato; Masaki Nakamura; Ryuji Matsumoto; Hiroshi Sasaki; Koji Mitsuzuka; Junichi Inokuchi; Katsuyoshi Hashine; Akira Yokomizo; Hirohito Naito; Isao Hara; Norihiko Kawamura; Masaharu Inoue; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Satoru Maruyama; Shinichi Sakamoto; Toshihiro Saito; Shin Egawa; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Mikio Sugimoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Online Collaborative Learning in Urology.

Authors:  Yi Li; Nora G Kern; Simon L Conti; Lindsay A Hampson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  The Use of Social Media for Medical Education Within Urology: a Journey Still in Progress.

Authors:  Kiana Saade; Thomas Shelton; Michael Ernst
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.092

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.