Literature DB >> 34228735

Evaluating the use of the QUiPP app and its impact on the management of threatened preterm labour: A cluster randomised trial.

Helena A Watson1, Naomi Carlisle1, Paul T Seed1, Jenny Carter1, Katy Kuhrt1, Rachel M Tribe1, Andrew H Shennan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery (before 37 weeks of gestation) is the single most important contributor to neonatal death and morbidity, with lifelong repercussions. However, the majority of women who present with preterm labour (PTL) symptoms do not deliver imminently. Accurate prediction of PTL is needed in order ensure correct management of those most at risk of preterm birth (PTB) and to prevent the maternal and fetal risks incurred by unnecessary interventions given to the majority. The QUantitative Innovation in Predicting Preterm birth (QUIPP) app aims to support clinical decision-making about women in threatened preterm labour (TPTL) by combining quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) values, cervical length (CL), and significant PTB risk factors to create an individualised percentage risk of delivery. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: EQUIPTT was a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 13 maternity units in South and Eastern England (United Kingdom) between March 2018 and February 2019. Pregnant women (n = 1,872) between 23+0 and 34+6 weeks' gestation with symptoms of PTL in the analysis period were assigned to either the intervention (762) or control (1,111). The mean age of the study population was 30.2 (+/- SD 5.93). A total of 56.0% were white, 19.6% were black, 14.2% were Asian, and 10.2% were of other ethnicities. The intervention was the use of the QUiPP app with admission, antenatal corticosteroids (ACSs), and transfer advised for women with a QUiPP risk of delivery >5% within 7 days. Control sites continued with their conventional management of TPTL. Unnecessary management for TPTL was a composite primary outcome defined by the sum of unnecessary admission decisions (admitted and delivery interval >7 days or not admitted and delivery interval ≤7 days) and the number of unnecessary in utero transfer (IUT) decisions/actions (IUT that occurred or were attempted >7 days prior to delivery) and ex utero transfers (EUTs) that should have been in utero (attempted and not attempted). Unnecessary management of TPTL was 11.3% (84/741) at the intervention sites versus 11.5% (126/1094) at control sites (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.42, p = 0.883). Control sites frequently used qfFN and did not follow UK national guidance, which recommends routine treatment below 30 weeks without testing. Unnecessary management largely consisted of unnecessary admissions which were similar at intervention and control sites (10.7% versus 10.8% of all visits). In terms of adverse outcomes for women in TPTL <36 weeks, 4 women from the intervention sites and 12 from the control sites did not receive recommended management. If the QUiPP percentage risk was used as per protocol, unnecessary management would have been 7.4% (43/578) versus 9.9% (134/1,351) (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-1.16). Our external validation of the QUiPP app confirmed that it was highly predictive of delivery in 7 days; receiver operating curve area was 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95) for symptomatic women. Study limitations included a lack of compliance with national guidance at the control sites and difficulties in implementation of the QUiPP app.
CONCLUSIONS: This cluster randomised trial did not demonstrate that the use of the QUiPP app reduced unnecessary management of TPTL compared to current management but would safely improve the management recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Interpretation of qfFN, with or without the QUiPP app, is a safe and accurate method for identifying women most likely to benefit from PTL interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN17846337.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34228735     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Med        ISSN: 1549-1277            Impact factor:   11.069


  26 in total

1.  Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Stephen J Bacak; William M Callaghan; Patricia M Dietz; Chadd Crouse
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Melissa L McPheeters; William C Miller; Katherine E Hartmann; David A Savitz; Jay S Kaufman; Joanne M Garrett; John M Thorp
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Association of Short Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration-to-Birth Intervals With Survival and Morbidity Among Very Preterm Infants: Results From the EPICE Cohort.

Authors:  Mikael Norman; Aurelie Piedvache; Klaus Børch; Lene Drasbek Huusom; Anna-Karin Edstedt Bonamy; Elizabeth A Howell; Pierre-Henri Jarreau; Rolf F Maier; Ole Pryds; Liis Toome; Heili Varendi; Tom Weber; Emilija Wilson; Arno Van Heijst; Marina Cuttini; Jan Mazela; Henrique Barros; Patrick Van Reempts; Elizabeth S Draper; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Cervical length in women in preterm labor with intact membranes: relationship to intra-amniotic inflammation/microbial invasion, cervical inflammation and preterm delivery.

Authors:  R-M Holst; B Jacobsson; H Hagberg; U-B Wennerholm
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Predictive value of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in threatened preterm labor.

Authors:  Gert-Jan van Baaren; Jolande Y Vis; Femke F Wilms; Martijn A Oudijk; Anneke Kwee; Martina M Porath; Guid Oei; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Marc E A Spaanderman; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Monique C Haak; Antoinette C Bolte; Caroline J Bax; Jérôme M J Cornette; Johannes J Duvekot; Bas W A Nij Bijvanck; Jim van Eyck; Maureen T M Franssen; Krystyna M Sollie; Frank P H A Vandenbussche; Mallory Woiski; William A Grobman; Joris A M van der Post; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Brent C Opmeer; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Does knowledge of cervical length and fetal fibronectin affect management of women with threatened preterm labor? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Amen Ness; John Visintine; Emily Ricci; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in women with symptoms of threatened preterm labor.

Authors:  J Carter; P T Seed; H A Watson; A L David; J Sandall; A H Shennan; R M Tribe
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  How to design efficient cluster randomised trials.

Authors:  K Hemming; S Eldridge; G Forbes; C Weijer; M Taljaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-07-14

9.  Study protocol: quantitative fibronectin to help decision-making in women with symptoms of preterm labour (QUIDS) part 2, UK Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Stock; Lisa M Wotherspoon; Kathleen Anne Boyd; Rachel K Morris; Jon Dorling; Lesley Jackson; Manju Chandiramani; Anna L David; Asma Khalil; Andrew Shennan; Victoria Hodgetts Morton; Tina Lavender; Khalid Khan; Susan Harper-Clarke; Ben Mol; Richard D Riley; John Norrie; Jane Norman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  All the right moves: why in utero transfer is both important for the baby and difficult to achieve and new strategies for change.

Authors:  Helena Watson; James McLaren; Naomi Carlisle; Nandiran Ratnavel; Tim Watts; Ahmed Zaima; Rachel M Tribe; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.