Literature DB >> 34228086

Effect of Antibiotic-Prescribing Feedback to High-Volume Primary Care Physicians on Number of Antibiotic Prescriptions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kevin L Schwartz1,2,3, Noah Ivers2,4,5, Bradley J Langford1,6, Monica Taljaard7,8, Drew Neish9, Kevin A Brown1,2, Valerie Leung1,10, Nick Daneman1,11,12, Javed Alloo13,14, Michael Silverman15,16, Emily Shing1, Jeremy M Grimshaw7,17, Jerome A Leis11,12, Julie H C Wu1, Gary Garber1,7,17.   

Abstract

Importance: Antibiotic overuse contributes to adverse drug effects, increased costs, and antimicrobial resistance. Objective: To evaluate peer-comparison audit and feedback to high-prescribing primary care physicians (PCPs) and assess the effect of targeted messaging on avoiding unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and avoiding long-duration prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this 3-arm randomized clinical trial, administrative data collected from IQVIA's Xponent database were used to recruit the highest quartile of antibiotic-prescribing PCPs (n = 3500) in Ontario, Canada. Interventions: Physicians were randomized 3:3:1 to receive a mailed letter sent in December 2018 addressing antibiotic treatment initiation (n = 1500), a letter addressing prescribing duration (n = 1500), or no letter (control; n = 500). Outliers at the 99th percentile at baseline for each arm were excluded from analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was total number of antibiotic prescriptions over 12 months postintervention. Secondary outcomes were number of prolonged-duration prescriptions (>7 days) and antibiotic drug costs (in Canadian dollars). Robust Poisson regression controlling for baseline prescriptions was used for analysis.
Results: Of the 3465 PCPs included in analysis, 2405 (69.4%) were male, and 2116 (61.1%) were 25 or more years from their medical graduation. At baseline, PCPs receiving the antibiotic initiation letter and duration letter prescribed an average of 988 and 1000 antibiotic prescriptions, respectively; at 12 months postintervention, these PCPs prescribed an average of 849 and 851 antibiotic prescriptions, respectively. For the primary outcome of total antibiotic prescriptions 12 months postintervention, there was no statistically significant difference in total antibiotic use between PCPs who received the initiation letter compared with controls (relative risk [RR], 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.92-1.01; P = .06) and a small statistically significant difference for the duration letter compared with controls (RR, 0.95; 97.5% CI, 0.91-1.00; P = .01). For PCPs receiving the duration letter, this corresponds to an average of 42 fewer antibiotic prescriptions over 12 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the letter arms. For the initiation letter, compared with controls there was an RR of 0.98 (97.5% CI, 0.93-1.03; P = .42) and 0.97 (97.5% CI, 0.92-1.02; P = .19) for the outcomes of prolonged-duration prescriptions and antibiotic drug costs, respectively. At baseline, PCPs who received the duration letter prescribed an average of 332 prolonged-duration prescriptions with $14 470 in drug costs. There was an 8.1% relative reduction (RR, 0.92; 97.5% CI, 0.87-0.97; P < .001) in prolonged-duration prescriptions, and a 6.1% relative reduction in antibiotic drug costs (RR, 0.94; 97.5% CI, 0.89-0.99; P = .01). This corresponds to an average of 24 fewer prolonged-duration prescriptions and $771 in drug cost savings per PCP over 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, a single mailed letter to the highest-prescribing PCPs in Ontario, Canada providing peer-comparison feedback, including messaging on limiting antibiotic-prescribing durations, led to statistically significant reductions in total and prolonged-duration antibiotic prescriptions, as well as drug costs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03776383.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34228086      PMCID: PMC8261687          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   44.409


  5 in total

1.  Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection across a national primary care network in 2019.

Authors:  Sabrina Wong; Shan Rajapakshe; David Barber; Andrea Patey; Wendy Levinson; Rachael Morkem; Gillian Hurwitz; Kimberly Wintermute; Jerome A Leis
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 2.  Biomarkers as point-of-care tests to guide prescription of antibiotics in people with acute respiratory infections in primary care.

Authors:  Ole Olsen; Siri Aas Smedemark; Rune Aabenhus; Carl Llor; Anders Fournaise; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-17

3.  Identifying Higher-Volume Antibiotic Outpatient Prescribers Using Publicly Available Medicare Part D Data - United States, 2019.

Authors:  Katryna A Gouin; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Sharon Tsay; Destani Bizune; Lauri A Hicks; Sarah Kabbani
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Optimizing responsiveness to feedback about antibiotic prescribing in primary care: protocol for two interrelated randomized implementation trials with embedded process evaluations.

Authors:  Jennifer Shuldiner; Kevin L Schwartz; Bradley J Langford; Noah M Ivers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Antibiotic Prescribing Practices for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections Among Primary Care Providers: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Liton Chandra Deb; Brenda M McGrath; Levi Schlosser; Austin Hewitt; Connor Schweitzer; Jeff Rotar; Nathan D Leedahl; Ross Crosby; Paul Carson
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.