Nicholas J Tustison1, Talissa A Altes2, Kun Qing3, Mu He1, G Wilson Miller1, Brian B Avants1, Yun M Shim1, James C Gee4, John P Mugler1, Jaime F Mata1. 1. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the differences between histogram-based and image-based algorithms for segmentation of hyperpolarized gas lung images. METHODS: Four previously published histogram-based segmentation algorithms (ie, linear binning, hierarchical k-means, fuzzy spatial c-means, and a Gaussian mixture model with a Markov random field prior) and an image-based convolutional neural network were used to segment 2 simulated data sets derived from a public (n = 29 subjects) and a retrospective collection (n = 51 subjects) of hyperpolarized 129Xe gas lung images transformed by common MRI artifacts (noise and nonlinear intensity distortion). The resulting ventilation-based segmentations were used to assess algorithmic performance and characterize optimization domain differences in terms of measurement bias and precision. RESULTS: Although facilitating computational processing and providing discriminating clinically relevant measures of interest, histogram-based segmentation methods discard important contextual spatial information and are consequently less robust in terms of measurement precision in the presence of common MRI artifacts relative to the image-based convolutional neural network. CONCLUSIONS: Direct optimization within the image domain using convolutional neural networks leverages spatial information, which mitigates problematic issues associated with histogram-based approaches and suggests a preferred future research direction. Further, the entire processing and evaluation framework, including the newly reported deep learning functionality, is available as open source through the well-known Advanced Normalization Tools ecosystem.
PURPOSE: To characterize the differences between histogram-based and image-based algorithms for segmentation of hyperpolarized gas lung images. METHODS: Four previously published histogram-based segmentation algorithms (ie, linear binning, hierarchical k-means, fuzzy spatial c-means, and a Gaussian mixture model with a Markov random field prior) and an image-based convolutional neural network were used to segment 2 simulated data sets derived from a public (n = 29 subjects) and a retrospective collection (n = 51 subjects) of hyperpolarized 129Xe gas lung images transformed by common MRI artifacts (noise and nonlinear intensity distortion). The resulting ventilation-based segmentations were used to assess algorithmic performance and characterize optimization domain differences in terms of measurement bias and precision. RESULTS: Although facilitating computational processing and providing discriminating clinically relevant measures of interest, histogram-based segmentation methods discard important contextual spatial information and are consequently less robust in terms of measurement precision in the presence of common MRI artifacts relative to the image-based convolutional neural network. CONCLUSIONS: Direct optimization within the image domain using convolutional neural networks leverages spatial information, which mitigates problematic issues associated with histogram-based approaches and suggests a preferred future research direction. Further, the entire processing and evaluation framework, including the newly reported deep learning functionality, is available as open source through the well-known Advanced Normalization Tools ecosystem.