| Literature DB >> 34227047 |
Priyanka Madaan1, Nirmal Raj Gopinathan2, Lokesh Saini1, Aarti Chauhan3, Harpreet Singh3, Neelesh Kumar3, Jitendra Kumar Sahu4.
Abstract
To achieve intensive activity-based and goal-directed rehabilitation for unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), several static and functional upper limb orthoses have been used but with limited robust evidence-base. The current pilot study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a customized 3D-printed orthotic device in children with UCP. The attainment of a prespecified goal and Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) at 3 and 6 mo were the efficacy measures. Of the 14 screened children, 5 (median age: 7.9 y; 3 boys) were included. The 3-mo follow-up could be completed for 3 children while 6-mo follow-up could be completed for 1 child. Rest could not be assessed due to pandemic restrictions. Although none attained set goals till the last follow-up, all 3 children (at 3-mo follow-up) showed improvement in SHUEE scores without any significant safety concerns. Further studies on 3D-printed orthosis in UCP are the need of the hour.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printed; Children; Hemiplegic cerebral palsy; Orthosis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34227047 PMCID: PMC8256949 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-021-03859-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pediatr ISSN: 0019-5456 Impact factor: 1.967
Fig. 1The design of ORGAN-hand orthosis. ORGAN-hand orthosis consists of a universal elbow brace (facilitating anatomical range of motion), a wrist brace (providing external fixation in extension and adjustable forearm wrist angle for supination, pronation, and neutral position), and dynamic finger braces with lock mechanism for each finger to allow movements at metacarpophalangeal, proximal, and distal interphalangeal joints. Tension between the braces is adjustable with the help of individual variable resistance mechanism to achieve desired position for each joint
Follow-up duration, results of Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation in the study subjects, and number of breakages of orthosis in each study subject
| Patient | Follow-up (in months) | Shriners hospital upper extremity evaluation scores (in percentage) | Breakage frequency | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3 mo | 6 mo | |||||||||
| SFA | DPA | GRA | SFA | DPA | GRA | SFA | DPA | GRA | |||
| 1 | 6 | 53.3 | 48.6 | 66.7 | 53.3 | 48.6 | 66.7 | 57.8 | 54.2 | 66.7% | FB: 20 WB: 3 |
| 2 | 3 | 97.7 | 93 | 83.3 | 100 | 97.2 | 100 | - | - | - | WB: 4 |
| 3 | 3 | 37.8 | 65.3 | 66.7 | 44.4 | 63.9 | 66.7 | - | - | - | FB: 10 WB: 2 |
| 4 | 2 | 26 | 43.1 | 33.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | FB: 16 WB:1 |
| 5 | 2 | 66.7 | 80.6 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | FB:4 WB:2 |
DPA Dynamic position analysis; FB Finger brace; GRA Grasp release analysis; SFA Spontaneous function analysis; WB Wrist brace
Higher scores indicate better function