Literature DB >> 34226629

Differential binding of human and murine IgGs to catalytic and cell wall binding domains of Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan hydrolases.

Min Wang1, Sanne van den Berg2, Yaremit Mora Hernández1, Aafke Hinke Visser1, Elias Vera Murguia1, Dennis G A M Koedijk1, Channah Bellink1, Hilde Bruggen1, Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg2, Jan Maarten van Dijl3, Girbe Buist1.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen causing high morbidity and mortality. Since multi-drug resistant S. aureus lineages are nowadays omnipresent, alternative tools for preventive or therapeutic interventions, like immunotherapy, are urgently needed. However, there are currently no vaccines against S. aureus. Surface-exposed and secreted proteins are regarded as potential targets for immunization against S. aureus infections. Yet, many potential staphylococcal antigens of this category do not elicit protective immune responses. To obtain a better understanding of this problem, we compared the binding of serum IgGs from healthy human volunteers, highly S. aureus-colonized patients with the genetic blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa (EB), or immunized mice to the purified S. aureus peptidoglycan hydrolases Sle1, Aly and LytM and their different domains. The results show that the most abundant serum IgGs from humans and immunized mice target the cell wall-binding domain of Sle1, and the catalytic domains of Aly and LytM. Interestingly, in a murine infection model, these particular IgGs were not protective against S. aureus bacteremia. In contrast, relatively less abundant IgGs against the catalytic domain of Sle1 and the N-terminal domains of Aly and LytM were almost exclusively detected in sera from EB patients and healthy volunteers. These latter IgGs may contribute to the protection against staphylococcal infections, as previous studies suggest that serum IgGs protect EB patients against severe S. aureus infection. Together, these observations focus attention on the use of particular protein domains for vaccination to direct potentially protective immune responses towards the most promising epitopes within staphylococcal antigens.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34226629     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93359-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  39 in total

Review 1.  Immune evasion by staphylococci.

Authors:  Timothy J Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  High anti-staphylococcal antibody titers in patients with epidermolysis bullosa relate to long-term colonization with alternating types of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Magdalena M van der Kooi-Pol; Corné P de Vogel; Gerlinde N Westerhout-Pluister; Yanka K Veenstra-Kyuchukova; José C Duipmans; Corinna Glasner; Girbe Buist; Goffe S Elsinga; Hans Westra; Hendrik P J Bonarius; Herman Groen; Willem J B van Wamel; Hajo Grundmann; Marcel F Jonkman; Jan Maarten van Dijl
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  High genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing patients with epidermolysis bullosa.

Authors:  Magdalena M van der Kooi-Pol; Yanka K Veenstra-Kyuchukova; José C Duipmans; Gerlinde N Pluister; Leo M Schouls; Albert J de Neeling; Hajo Grundmann; Marcel F Jonkman; Jan Maarten van Dijl
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 4.  Host-pathogen interactions in epidermolysis bullosa patients colonized with Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Magdalena M van der Kooi-Pol; José C Duipmans; Marcel F Jonkman; Jan Maarten van Dijl
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  IgG4 subclass-specific responses to Staphylococcus aureus antigens shed new light on host-pathogen interaction.

Authors:  Jasper Swierstra; Stephanie Debets; Corné de Vogel; Nicole Lemmens-den Toom; Nelianne Verkaik; Nadjia Ramdani-Bouguessa; Marcel F Jonkman; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Ahmed Fahal; Alex van Belkum; Willem van Wamel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Heiman F L Wertheim; Damian C Melles; Margreet C Vos; Willem van Leeuwen; Alex van Belkum; Henri A Verbrugh; Jan L Nouwen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Comparison of antibody repertoires against Staphylococcus aureus in healthy individuals and in acutely infected patients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Dryla; Sonja Prustomersky; Dieter Gelbmann; Markus Hanner; Edith Bettinger; Béla Kocsis; Tamás Kustos; Tamás Henics; Andreas Meinke; Eszter Nagy
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-03

8.  Predicting the Staphylococcus aureus nasal carrier state: derivation and validation of a "culture rule".

Authors:  Jan L Nouwen; Alewijn Ott; Marjolein F Q Kluytmans-Vandenbergh; Hélène A M Boelens; Albert Hofman; Alex van Belkum; Henri A Verbrugh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001-2004.

Authors:  Rachel J Gorwitz; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Sigrid K McAllister; Geraldine McQuillan; Linda K McDougal; Gregory E Fosheim; Bette J Jensen; George Killgore; Fred C Tenover; Matthew J Kuehnert
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Eili Klein; David L Smith; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phage display of environmental protein toxins and virulence factors reveals the prevalence, persistence, and genetics of antibody responses.

Authors:  Julia W Angkeow; Daniel R Monaco; Athena Chen; Thiagarajan Venkataraman; Sahana Jayaraman; Cristian Valencia; Brandon M Sie; Thomas Liechti; Payam N Farhadi; Gabriela Funez-dePagnier; Cheryl A Sherman-Baust; May Q Wong; Ingo Ruczinski; Patrizio Caturegli; Cynthia L Sears; Patricia J Simner; June L Round; Priya Duggal; Uri Laserson; Theodore S Steiner; Ranjan Sen; Thomas E Lloyd; Mario Roederer; Andrew L Mammen; Randy S Longman; Lisa G Rider; H Benjamin Larman
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 43.474

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.