Literature DB >> 34226617

Sequencing an F1 hybrid of Silurus asotus and S. meridionalis enabled the assembly of high-quality parental genomes.

Weitao Chen1,2, Ming Zou3, Yuefei Li1,2, Shuli Zhu1,2, Xinhui Li1,2, Jie Li4,5.   

Abstract

Genome complexity such as heterozygosity may heavily influence its de novo assembly. Sequencing somatic cells of the F1 hybrids harboring two sets of genetic materials from both of the paternal and maternal species may avoid alleles discrimination during assembly. However, the feasibility of this strategy needs further assessments. We sequenced and assembled the genome of an F1 hybrid between Silurus asotus and S. meridionalis using the SequelII platform and Hi-C scaffolding technologies. More than 300 Gb raw data were generated, and the final assembly obtained 2344 scaffolds composed of 3017 contigs. The N50 length of scaffolds and contigs was 28.55 Mb and 7.49 Mb, respectively. Based on the mapping results of short reads generated for the paternal and maternal species, each of the 29 chromosomes originating from S. asotus and S. meridionalis was recognized. We recovered nearly 94% and 96% of the total length of S. asotus and S. meridionalis. BUSCO assessments and mapping analyses suggested that both genomes had high completeness and accuracy. Further analyses demonstrated the high collinearity between S. asotus, S. meridionalis, and the related Pelteobagrus fulvidraco. Comparison of the two genomes with that assembled only using the short reads from non-hybrid parental species detected a small portion of sequences that may be incorrectly assigned to the different species. We supposed that at least part of these situations may have resulted from mitotic recombination. The strategy of sequencing the F1 hybrid genome can recover the vast majority of the parental genomes and may improve the assembly of complex genomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34226617     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93257-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  36 in total

1.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Somatic recombination in adult tissues: What is there to learn?

Authors:  Katarzyna Siudeja; Allison J Bardin
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.160

3.  Mobile interspersed repeats are major structural variants in the human genome.

Authors:  Cheng Ran Lisa Huang; Anna M Schneider; Yunqi Lu; Tejasvi Niranjan; Peilin Shen; Matoya A Robinson; Jared P Steranka; David Valle; Curt I Civin; Tao Wang; Sarah J Wheelan; Hongkai Ji; Jef D Boeke; Kathleen H Burns
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Transcriptome analysis reveals hybridization-induced genome shock in an interspecific F1 hybrid from Camellia.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Xin-Kai Liu; Wen Fan; Dan-Feng Yan; Nai-Sheng Zhong; Ji-Yin Gao; Wen-Ju Zhang
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor.

Authors:  Shifu Chen; Yanqing Zhou; Yaru Chen; Jia Gu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Sequencing a Juglans regia × J. microcarpa hybrid yields high-quality genome assemblies of parental species.

Authors:  Tingting Zhu; Le Wang; Frank M You; Juan C Rodriguez; Karin R Deal; Limin Chen; Jie Li; Sandeep Chakraborty; Bipin Balan; Cai-Zhong Jiang; Patrick J Brown; Charles A Leslie; Mallikarjuna K Aradhya; Abhaya M Dandekar; Patrick E McGuire; Daniel Kluepfel; Jan Dvorak; Ming-Cheng Luo
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  Redundans: an assembly pipeline for highly heterozygous genomes.

Authors:  Leszek P Pryszcz; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system.

Authors:  Guillaume Marçais; Arthur L Delcher; Adam M Phillippy; Rachel Coston; Steven L Salzberg; Aleksey Zimin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  From asymmetrical to balanced genomic diversification during rediploidization: Subgenomic evolution in allotetraploid fish.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Jing Chai; Yanling Wen; Min Tao; Guoliang Lin; Xiaochuan Liu; Li Ren; Zeyu Chen; Shigang Wu; Shengnan Li; Yude Wang; Qinbo Qin; Shi Wang; Yun Gao; Feng Huang; Lu Wang; Cheng Ai; Xiaobo Wang; Lianwei Li; Chengxi Ye; Huimin Yang; Mi Luo; Jie Chen; Hong Hu; Liujiao Yuan; Li Zhong; Jing Wang; Jian Xu; Zhenglin Du; Zhanshan Sam Ma; Robert W Murphy; Axel Meyer; Jianfang Gui; Peng Xu; Jue Ruan; Z Jeffrey Chen; Shaojun Liu; Xuemei Lu; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes.

Authors:  Michael Alonge; Sebastian Soyk; Srividya Ramakrishnan; Xingang Wang; Sara Goodwin; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Zachary B Lippman; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  2 in total

1.  Insights into chromosomal evolution and sex determination of Pseudobagrus ussuriensis (Bagridae, Siluriformes) based on a chromosome-level genome.

Authors:  Chuankun Zhu; Haiyang Liu; Zhengjun Pan; Lei Cheng; Yanhong Sun; Hui Wang; Guoliang Chang; Nan Wu; Huaiyu Ding; Haitao Zhao; Lei Zhang; Xiangsheng Yu
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.477

2.  Genomic analyses of wild argali, domestic sheep, and their hybrids provide insights into chromosome evolution, phenotypic variation, and germplasm innovation.

Authors:  Xin Li; San-Gang He; Wen-Rong Li; Ling-Yun Luo; Ze Yan; Dong-Xin Mo; Xing Wan; Feng-Hua Lv; Ji Yang; Ya-Xi Xu; Juan Deng; Qiang-Hui Zhu; Xing-Long Xie; Song-Song Xu; Chen-Xi Liu; Xin-Rong Peng; Bin Han; Zhong-Hui Li; Lei Chen; Jian-Lin Han; Xue-Zhi Ding; Renqing Dingkao; Yue-Feng Chu; Jin-Yan Wu; Li-Min Wang; Ping Zhou; Ming-Jun Liu; Meng-Hua Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 9.438

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.