Literature DB >> 34226231

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers of a Swiss tertiary care centre at the end of the first wave: a cross-sectional study.

Sylvain Meylan1, Urania Dafni2, Frederic Lamoth3,4, Zoi Tsourti2, Michael A Lobritz5, Jean Regina3, Philippe Bressin6, Laurence Senn7, Bruno Grandbastien7, Cyril Andre8, Craig Fenwick4, Valerie D'Acremont9, Antony Croxatto4, Isabelle Guilleret10, Gilbert Greub4, Oriol Manuel3, Thierry Calandra3, Giuseppe Pantaleo8, Catherine Lazor-Blanchet6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the SARS-CoV-2 transmission in healthcare workers (HCWs) using seroprevalence as a surrogate marker of infection in our tertiary care centre according to exposure.
DESIGN: Seroprevalence cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Single centre at the end of the first COVID-19 wave in Lausanne, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 1874 of 4074 responders randomly selected (46% response rate), stratified by work category among the 13 474 (13.9%) HCWs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serostatus paired with a questionnaire of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition risk factors internal and external to the workplace.
RESULTS: The overall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rate among HCWs was 10.0% (95% CI 8.7% to 11.5%). HCWs with daily patient contact did not experience increased rates of seropositivity relative to those without (10.3% vs 9.6%, respectively, p=0.64). HCWs with direct contact with patients with COVID-19 or working in COVID-19 units did not experience increased seropositivity rates relative to their counterparts (10.4% vs 9.8%, p=0.69 and 10.6% vs 9.9%, p=0.69, respectively). However, specific locations of contact with patients irrespective of COVID-19 status-in patient rooms or reception areas-did correlate with increased rates of seropositivity (11.9% vs 7.5%, p=0.019 and 14.3% vs 9.2%, p=0.025, respectively). In contrast, HCWs with a suspected or proven SARS-CoV-2-infected household contact had significantly higher seropositivity rates than those without such contacts (19.0% vs 8.7%, p<0.001 and 42.1% vs 9.4%, p<0.001, respectively). Finally, consistent use of a mask on public transportation correlated with decreased seroprevalence (5.3% for mask users vs 11.2% for intermittent or no mask use, p=0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall seroprevalence was 10% without significant differences in seroprevalence between HCWs exposed to patients with COVID-19 and HCWs not exposed. This suggests that, once fully in place, protective measures limited SARS-CoV-2 occupational acquisition within the hospital environment. SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion among HCWs was associated primarily with community risk factors, particularly household transmission. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; epidemiology; infection control; occupational & industrial medicine; preventive medicine; virology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34226231     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Low neutralizing antibody titers after asymptomatic or non-severe SARS-CoV-2 infection over a 6-month assessment period.

Authors:  C Lazor-Blanchet; P Zygoura; U Dafni; F Lamoth; Z Tsourti; M A Lobritz; J Regina; B Grandbastien; C Fenwick; G Pantaleo; T Calandra; S Meylan
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 38.637

2.  SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence among Healthcare Workers after the First and Second Pandemic Waves.

Authors:  Nathalie de Visscher; Xavier Holemans; Aline Gillain; Anne Kornreich; Raphael Lagasse; Philippe Piette; Manfredi Ventura; Frédéric Thys
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 3.  SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Those Utilizing Public Transportation or Working in the Transportation Industry: A Rapid Review.

Authors:  Aliisa Heiskanen; Yannick Galipeau; Marc-André Langlois; Julian Little; Curtis L Cooper
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Association between household exposure and cycle threshold in COVID-19 infected health care workers.

Authors:  Ai Chien; Sandra Domeracki; Sandeep Guntur; Kristopher Taylor; Chuanyi M Lu; Harry Lampiris; Paul D Blanc
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.646

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.