Literature DB >> 34225891

Evaluation of the optimal dosage of BMP-9 through the comparison of bone regeneration induced by BMP-9 versus BMP-2 using an injectable microparticle embedded thermosensitive polymeric carrier in a rat cranial defect model.

Bipin Gaihre1, Angshuman Bharadwaz1, Janitha M Unagolla1, Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya2.   

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are well known as enhancers and facilitators of osteogenesis during bone regeneration. The use of recombinant BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) in bone defect healing has drawbacks, which has driven the scouting for alternatives, such as recombinant BMP-9 (rhBMP-9), to provide comparable new bone formation. However, the dosage of rhBMP-9 is quintessential for the facilitation of adequate bone defect healing. Therefore, this study has been designed to evaluate the optimal dosage of BMP-9 by comparing the bone defect healing induced by rhBMP-9 over rhBMP-2. The chitosan (CS) microparticles (MPs), coated with BMPs, were embedded in a thermoresponsive methylcellulose (MC) and calcium alginate (Alg) based injectable delivery system containing a dosage of either 0.5 μg or 1.5 μg of the respective rhBMP per bone defect. A 5 mm critical-sized cranial defect rat model has been used in this study, and bone tissues were harvested at eight weeks post-surgery. The standard tools for comparing the new bone regeneration included micro computerized tomography (micro-CT) and histological analysis. A novel perspective of analyzing the new bone quality and crystallinity was employed by using Raman spectroscopy, along with its elastic modulus quantified through Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Results showed that the rhBMP-9 administered at a dosage of 1.5 μg per bone defect, using this delivery system, can adequately facilitate the bone void filling with ample new bone mineralization and crystallinity as compared to rhBMP-2, thus approving the hypothesis for a viable rhBMP-2 alternative.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atomic force microscopy; Bone morphogenetic protein; Bone regeneration; Microparticles; Raman spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34225891      PMCID: PMC8260961          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931


  75 in total

1.  High-resolution AFM imaging of intact and fractured trabecular bone.

Authors:  Tue Hassenkam; Georg E Fantner; Jacqueline A Cutroni; James C Weaver; Daniel E Morse; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture.

Authors:  Georg E Fantner; Tue Hassenkam; Johannes H Kindt; James C Weaver; Henrik Birkedal; Leonid Pechenik; Jacqueline A Cutroni; Geraldo A G Cidade; Galen D Stucky; Daniel E Morse; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2005-07-17       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  On the increasing fragility of human teeth with age: a deep-UV resonance Raman study.

Authors:  Joel W Ager; Ravi K Nalla; Guive Balooch; Grace Kim; Megan Pugach; Stefan Habelitz; Grayson W Marshall; John H Kinney; Robert O Ritchie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Mechanical property determination of bone through nano- and micro-indentation testing and finite element simulation.

Authors:  Jingzhou Zhang; Glen L Niebur; Timothy C Ovaert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Detection of early osteogenic commitment in primary cells using Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Stephanie J Smith; Roger Emery; Andrew Pitsillides; Claire E Clarkin; Sumeet Mahajan
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Temperature responsive surface layers of modified celluloses.

Authors:  Rasmus Bodvik; Esben Thormann; Leif Karlson; Per M Claesson
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with and without bone morphogenetic protein-2 augmentation: a 10-year cohort controlled study.

Authors:  Garet C Comer; Micah W Smith; Eric L Hurwitz; Kyle A Mitsunaga; Robert Kessler; Eugene J Carragee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Noggin resistance contributes to the potent osteogenic capability of BMP9 in mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Siqi Hong; Ming Li; Jiye Zhang; Yang Bi; Yun He; Xing Liu; Guoxin Nan; Yuxi Su; Gaohui Zhu; Ruidong Li; Wenwen Zhang; Jinhua Wang; Hongyu Zhang; Yuhan Kong; Wei Shui; Ningning Wu; Yunfeng He; Xian Chen; Hue H Luu; Rex C Haydon; Lewis L Shi; Tong-Chuan He; Jiaqiang Qin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Perivascular stem cells: a prospectively purified mesenchymal stem cell population for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Aaron W James; Janette N Zara; Xinli Zhang; Asal Askarinam; Raghav Goyal; Michael Chiang; Wei Yuan; Le Chang; Mirko Corselli; Jia Shen; Shen Pang; David Stoker; Ben Wu; Kang Ting; Bruno Péault; Chia Soo
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Raman Spectroscopy detects changes in Bone Mineral Quality and Collagen Cross-linkage in Staphylococcus Infected Human Bone.

Authors:  Mohamed Khalid; Tanujjal Bora; Ahmed Al Ghaithi; Sharanjit Thukral; Joydeep Dutta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.