Julia P Schleimer1,2, Christopher D McCort3,4, Aaron B Shev3,4, Veronica A Pear3,4, Elizabeth Tomsich3,4, Alaina De Biasi3,4, Shani Buggs3,4, Hannah S Laqueur3,4, Garen J Wintemute3,4. 1. Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. jpschleimer@ucdavis.edu. 2. University of California Firearm Violence Research Center at UC Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. jpschleimer@ucdavis.edu. 3. Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. 4. University of California Firearm Violence Research Center at UC Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Firearm violence is a significant public health problem in the United States. A surge in firearm purchasing following the onset of the coronavirus pandemic may have contributed to an increase in firearm violence. We sought to estimate the state-level association between firearm purchasing and interpersonal firearm violence during the pandemic. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia from January 2018 through July 2020. Data were obtained from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (a proxy for firearm purchasing) and the Gun Violence Archive. Using negative binomial regression models, we estimated the association between cumulative excess firearm purchases in March through July 2020 (measured as the difference between observed rates and those expected from autoregressive integrated moving average models) and injuries (including nonfatal and fatal) from intentional, interpersonal firearm violence (non-domestic and domestic violence). RESULTS: We estimated that there were 4.3 million excess firearm purchases nationally from March through July 2020 and a total of 4075 more firearm injuries than expected from April through July. We found no relationship between state-level excess purchasing and non-domestic firearm violence, e.g., each excess purchase per 100 population was associated with a rate ratio (RR) of firearm injury from non-domestic violence of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.50-1.02) in April; 0.99 (95% CI: 0.72-1.25) in May; 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.32) in June; and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.85-1.12) in July. Excess firearm purchasing within states was associated with an increase in firearm injuries from domestic violence in April (RR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.32-5.93) and May (RR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.19-2.91), though estimates were sensitive to model specification. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide, firearm purchasing and firearm violence increased substantially during the first months of the coronavirus pandemic. At the state level, the magnitude of the increase in purchasing was not associated with the magnitude of the increase in firearm violence. Increases in purchasing may have contributed to additional firearm injuries from domestic violence in April and May. Results suggest much of the rise in firearm violence during our study period was attributable to other factors, indicating a need for additional research.
BACKGROUND: Firearm violence is a significant public health problem in the United States. A surge in firearm purchasing following the onset of the coronavirus pandemic may have contributed to an increase in firearm violence. We sought to estimate the state-level association between firearm purchasing and interpersonal firearm violence during the pandemic. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia from January 2018 through July 2020. Data were obtained from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (a proxy for firearm purchasing) and the Gun Violence Archive. Using negative binomial regression models, we estimated the association between cumulative excess firearm purchases in March through July 2020 (measured as the difference between observed rates and those expected from autoregressive integrated moving average models) and injuries (including nonfatal and fatal) from intentional, interpersonal firearm violence (non-domestic and domestic violence). RESULTS: We estimated that there were 4.3 million excess firearm purchases nationally from March through July 2020 and a total of 4075 more firearm injuries than expected from April through July. We found no relationship between state-level excess purchasing and non-domestic firearm violence, e.g., each excess purchase per 100 population was associated with a rate ratio (RR) of firearm injury from non-domestic violence of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.50-1.02) in April; 0.99 (95% CI: 0.72-1.25) in May; 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93-1.32) in June; and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.85-1.12) in July. Excess firearm purchasing within states was associated with an increase in firearm injuries from domestic violence in April (RR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.32-5.93) and May (RR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.19-2.91), though estimates were sensitive to model specification. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide, firearm purchasing and firearm violence increased substantially during the first months of the coronavirus pandemic. At the state level, the magnitude of the increase in purchasing was not associated with the magnitude of the increase in firearm violence. Increases in purchasing may have contributed to additional firearm injuries from domestic violence in April and May. Results suggest much of the rise in firearm violence during our study period was attributable to other factors, indicating a need for additional research.
Authors: A L Kellermann; F P Rivara; G Somes; D T Reay; J Francisco; J G Banton; J Prodzinski; C Fligner; B B Hackman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A L Kellermann; F P Rivara; N B Rushforth; J G Banton; D T Reay; J T Francisco; A B Locci; J Prodzinski; B B Hackman; G Somes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marie Crandall; Douglas Sharp; Erin Unger; David Straus; Karen Brasel; Renee Hsia; Thomas Esposito Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elinore J Kaufman; Jesse E Passman; Sara F Jacoby; Daniel N Holena; Mark J Seamon; Jim MacMillan; Jessica H Beard Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-10-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Christopher J Ruhm; Victor Puac-Polanco; Irving H Hwang; Sue Lee; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Hannah N Ziobrowski; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jose R Zubizarreta Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Amelia T Collings; Manzur Farazi; Kyle J Van Arendonk; Mary E Fallat; Peter C Minneci; Thomas T Sato; K Elizabeth Speck; Katherine J Deans; Richard A Falcone; David S Foley; Jason D Fraser; Samir K Gadepalli; Martin S Keller; Meera Kotagal; Matthew P Landman; Charles M Leys; Troy A Markel; Nathan Rubalcava; Shawn D St Peter; Katherine T Flynn-O'Brien Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Wai Tat Chiu; Irving H Hwang; Victor Puac-Polanco; Nancy A Sampson; Hannah N Ziobrowski; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Psychiatr Clin North Am Date: 2021-11-12
Authors: Asanthi M Ratnasekera; Sirivan S Seng; Christina L Jacovides; Ryann Kolb; Alexandra Hanlon; Stanislaw P Stawicki; Niels D Martin; Elinore J Kaufman Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.982