Literature DB >> 34225745

Designing a stakeholder-inclusive service model for an eHealth service to support older adults in an active and social life.

Marijke Broekhuis1,2, Marit Dekker-van Weering3, Cheyenne Schuit4, Stefan Schürz5, Lex van Velsen6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Service model design is slowly being recognized among eHealth developers as a valuable method for creating durable implementation strategies. Nonetheless, practical guidelines and case-studies that inform the community on how to design a service model for an eHealth innovation are lacking. This study describes the development of a service model for an eHealth service, titled 'SALSA', which intends to support older adults with a physically active and socially inclusive lifestyle.
METHODS: The service model for the SALSA service was developed in eight consecutive rounds, using a mixed-methods approach. First, a stakeholder salience analysis was conducted to identify the most relevant stakeholders. In rounds 2-4, in-depth insights about implementation barriers, facilitators and workflow processes of these stakeholders were gathered. Rounds 5 and 6 were set up to optimize the service model and receive feedback from stakeholders. In rounds 7 and 8, we focused on future implementation and integrating the service model with the technical components of the eHealth service.
RESULTS: While the initial goal was to create one digital platform for the eHealth service, the results of the service modelling showed how the needs of two important stakeholders, physiotherapists and sports trainers, were too different for integrating them in one platform. Therefore, the decision was made to create two platforms, one for preventive (senior sports activities) and one for curative (physical rehabilitation) purposes.
CONCLUSIONS: A service model shows the interplay between service model design, technical development and business modelling. The process of service modelling helps to align the interests of the different stakeholders to create support for future implementation of an eHealth service. This study provides clear documentation on how to conduct service model design processes which can enable future learning and kickstart new research. Our results show the potential that service model design has for service development and innovation in health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; Service model; User-centred design; eHealth

Year:  2021        PMID: 34225745     DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06597-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  11 in total

1.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Stakeholder analysis for health research: case studies from low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  A Hyder; S Syed; P Puvanachandra; G Bloom; S Sundaram; S Mahmood; M Iqbal; Z Hongwen; N Ravichandran; O Oladepo; G Pariyo; D Peters
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  Lessons learned implementing a regional health information exchange in Geneva as a pilot for the Swiss national eHealth strategy.

Authors:  Antoine Geissbuhler
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies.

Authors:  Cynthia LeRouge; Jiao Ma; Sweta Sneha; Kristin Tolle
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  A systematic review of reviews to identify key research opportunities within the field of eHealth implementation.

Authors:  Bakhtiyar Ahmed; Thomas Dannhauser; Nada Philip
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.184

6.  A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: mast.

Authors:  Kristian Kidholm; Anne Granstrøm Ekeland; Lise Kvistgaard Jensen; Janne Rasmussen; Claus Duedal Pedersen; Alison Bowes; Signe Agnes Flottorp; Mickael Bech
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Care Models of eHealth Services: A Case Study on the Design of a Business Model for an Online Precare Service.

Authors:  Dorine Pd van Meeuwen; Quirine J van Walt Meijer; Lianne Wl Simonse
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-03-24

8.  Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop.

Authors:  Michelle Helena Van Velthoven; Carlos Cordon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Implementation Strategies to Enhance the Implementation of eHealth Programs for Patients With Chronic Illnesses: Realist Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cecilie Varsi; Lise Solberg Nes; Olöf Birna Kristjansdottir; Saskia M Kelders; Una Stenberg; Heidi Andersen Zangi; Elin Børøsund; Karen Elizabeth Weiss; Audun Stubhaug; Rikke Aune Asbjørnsen; Marianne Westeng; Marte Ødegaard; Hilde Eide
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Limitations of User-and Human-Centered Design in an eHealth Context and How to Move Beyond Them.

Authors:  Lex van Velsen; Geke Ludden; Christiane Grünloh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 7.076

2.  The relations between business model efficiency and novelty, and outcome while accounting for managed competition contract: a quantitative study among Dutch physiotherapy primary healthcare organisations.

Authors:  Rutger IJntema; Di-Janne Barten; Hans Duits; Brian Tjemkes; Cindy Veenhof
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.908

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.