| Literature DB >> 34222574 |
Ibrahim Khansa1, Gregory D Pearson1, Kim Bjorklund1, Alyssa Fogolin1, Richard E Kirschner1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite regulations currently in place, the incidence of lawnmower injuries in children has not decreased for several decades in the United States. In fact, studies in several countries show that the incidence of riding lawnmower injuries are actually on the rise worldwide. Those injuries tend to be devastating and limb-threatening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pediatric trauma center's experience with those injuries over the past 25 years.Entities:
Keywords: Amputation; Child; Injury; Lawnmower; Push mower; Riding lawnmower; lawnmowers; pediatric
Year: 2021 PMID: 34222574 PMCID: PMC8246087 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JPRAS Open ISSN: 2352-5878
Demographics and characteristics of the patients included in the study
| n | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 142 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 115 | 81 |
| Female | 27 | 19 |
| Average age (years) | 7.5 | |
| Type of lawnmower | ||
| Push | 34 | 23.9 |
| Riding | 108 | 76.1 |
| Mechanism of injury | ||
| Struck by rotating blade | 86.6 | |
| Fell off mower while riding | 29 | 20.4 |
| Struck by forward-moving mower | 45 | 31.7 |
| Struck by backward-moving mower | 24 | 16.9 |
| Put hand in blades | 5 | 3.5 |
| Slipped under mower | 20 | 14.1 |
| Operating mower on a slope | 8 | 5.6 |
| Struck by projectile | 7 | 4.9 |
| Other (including burn) | 4 | 2.8 |
| Open fracture | ||
| Yes | 97 | 68.3 |
| No | 45 | 31.7 |
| Amputation | ||
| Yes | 54 | 38 |
| No | 88 | 62 |
| Average number of surgeries required per patient | 2.2 | |
| Average length of hospital stay (days) | 7.4 |
Differences in patient characteristics and outcomes between push and riding lawnmowers
| Push lawnmower | Riding lawnmower | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 34 | 108 | |
| Age (years) | 11 | 6.3 | <0.001 |
| Open fracture | 25 (73.5%) | 72 (66.7%) | 0.5 |
| Amputation | 17 (50%) | 37 (34.3%) | 0.1 |
| Amputation at wrist/ankle or proximal | 2 (11.8%) | 9 (24.3%) | 0.3 |
| Amputation distal to wrist/ankle | 15 (88.2%) | 28 (75.7%) | 0.3 |
| 1 digit or portion thereof | 9 (60%) | 16 (57.1%) | |
| 2 digits | 5 (33.3%) | 3 (10.7%) | |
| 3 digits | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (3.6%) | |
| 4 digits | 0 | 6 (21.4%) | |
| 5 digits or entire hand/foot | 0 | 2 (7.1%) | |
| Average number of digits amputated | 1.9 | 2.8 | 0.03 |
| Soft tissue defect that required reconstruction | 35.3% | 56.5% | 0.03 |
| Length of hospital stay (days) | 2.7 | 8.9 | <0.001 |
| Average number of surgeries required per patient | 1.3 | 2.5 | <0.001 |
Figure 1A) After being run over by a riding lawnmower driven backwards, a 3-year-old male sustained a degloving injury of his left medial foot and ankle, without joint penetration or fractures.
B) The patient underwent four operative debridements and negative pressure wound therapy, followed by the application of bilayer dermal regeneration template.
C) After complete vascularization and granulation of the dermal regeneration template, split-thickness skin grafting was performed.
D) and E) The patient healed uneventfully and underwent a period of physical therapy to address ankle stiffness.
Figure 2A) A 5-year-old male sustained a traumatic amputation through the talocrural joint, after falling off a moving riding lawn mower that he was sitting on with a family friend. Significant soft tissue injury was evident in the muscles and tendons of the calf. The wound was heavily contaminated.
B) The patient underwent five operative debridements and negative pressure wound therapy. The patient did not have adequate soft tissue coverage over the distal stump (shown).
C) A tibialis anterior myocutaneous flap was elevated and advanced to cover the distal stump with well-padded soft tissue. The flap was myodesed to the bone through drill holes.
D) After flap coverage of the distal stump, the residual calf defect is covered with a split-thickness skin graft
E) and F) The patient's leg healed fully, and he is able to walk and run with a custom prosthesis
Summary of lawnmower safety recommendations
| Children younger than 16 years should not use a riding lawnmower |
| Children younger than 12 years should not use a push mower |
| Make sure no children are around before operating a lawnmower |
| Operator must remain attentive as children may approach the lawnmower without being noticed or heard |
| Children should never ride on a lawn mower |
| Operator must look in all directions while operating mower or changing directions, particularly while backing up |
| Blades should never be engaged when a riding lawnmower is backing up |
| Never use a riding lawnmower on a slope steeper than 15 degrees |
| When using a riding lawnmower on a slope between 0 and 15 degrees, mow up and down the slope rather than across the slope |
| When using a push mower on a slope, mow across the slope rather than up and down the slope |
| Before touching the engine or the blades, always make sure the lawnmower is completely off |
| Never modify the “deadman” mechanism to keep the lawn mower operating with hands off the handle |
| Remove all debris and rocks from the area before mowing |
| Do not operate a lawnmower if its shields/guards are damaged or missing |
| Do not operate a lawnmower with loose hair and clothing |
| Always wear protective clothing when mowing, which includes sturdy shoes and polycarbonate goggles |