Literature DB >> 34222499

Maternal predictive factors for preterm birth: A case-control study in Southern Iran.

Azin Alavi1, Parisa Razmjoue2, Ali Safari-Moradabadi3, Sakineh Dadipoor4, Saeideh Shahsavari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is one of the most important factors that increase the risk of chronic diseases and postpartum death in infants. The aim of this study was to determine the maternal factors that affect the birth of preterm infants in the city of Bandar Abbas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a case-control study that was performed on 400 preterm infants. Sampling was done by a simple method, and information was gathered by interviewing the mothers and their medical records. Data were collected by SPSS software version 16. To compare risk factors in the two groups, conditional logistic regression was used, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Results showed that factors such as type of delivery (odds ratio [OR] = 3.584, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.981-6.485), preeclampsia (OR = 2.688, 95% CI: 1.164-6.207), history of PTB (OR = 4.171, 95% CI: 1.483-11.728), premature rupture of membranes (OR = 3.273, 95% CI: 1.745-6.137), care during prenatal (OR = 0.334, 95% CI: 0.159-0.701), placental abruption (OR = 3.209, 95% CI: 1.209-8.519), placenta previa (OR = 9.333, 95% CI: 2.086-41.770), and cervical insufficiency (OR = 11, 95% CI: 1.381-87.641) were independent risk factors of preterm infant birth.
CONCLUSIONS: The PTB risk is higher for women with cervical insufficiency, history of placenta previa, and history of preterm. Early recognition and management of these high-risk conditions among pregnant women may lead to a reduction in PTB rates. Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infant; pregnancy; preterm birth; risk factor

Year:  2021        PMID: 34222499      PMCID: PMC8224520          DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_668_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Health Promot        ISSN: 2277-9531


Introduction

According to the definition of the World Health Organization, preterm birth (PTB) is defined as giving birth before the 37th week or <259 days of the last day of menstruation.[1] PTB is one of the greatest public health problems around the world, accounting for 6%–10% of births in high-income countries and 15% in low-income countries.[2] According to the available statistics, 3.1% of the diseases are attributable to PTB,[3] causing 35% of the 1.3 million annual infant mortalities worldwide.[4] After pneumonia, PTB is the second leading cause of death in children under the age of 5 years.[456] Of the approximately 130 million infants born annually across the world, about 15 million are PTBs. In general, the prevalence of PTB is between 5% and 18% in 184 countries, most of which are in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.[7] According to the reports published in 2010, the prevalence of PTB in Iran is 12.9%, ranking 38th among 184 countries in the world.[8] PTB is a risk factor that puts the infant at risk of chronic diseases and postpartum death.[9] Some of these sociodemographic factors are associated with gynecological diseases, maternal disorders, and common medical problems of infants.[101112] A wide range of maternal, fetal, and placental factors contributes to the birth of preterm infants. Among these factors, one can refer to multiple birth, smoking, uterus problems, and placenta previa.[13] Premature infants particularly have more risk factors such as death, illness, long-term motor impairment, and cognitive, visual, auditory, behavioral, social-emotional, health, and growth problems compared to normal babies, and impose a higher cost on the society due to behavioral disorders and lack of ability to adapt to the environment.[14] Considering the role of PTB as an important risk factor for neonatal mortality, it is necessary to identify factors that are associated with PTB. Therefore, since few studies have been conducted in Iran to identify factors that affect PTB, this study was conducted to identify the risk factors that play the most role in the occurrence of PTB, so that a favorable ground could be provided for effective intervention to reduce the incidence of PTB and, consequently, the rate of infant mortality.

Materials and Methods

Study design and participant

In this case–control study, maternal factors affecting the birth of a baby were examined as a case item (one to one) to determine the factors that affect the birth of a preterm infant. The data collection process began in October 2018 and lasted for 3 months. All women with vaginal delivery and cesarean section were enrolled in this study.

Definition of the case and control

PTB is defined as the birth of a baby before 37 weeks.[15] All women with preterm infants (before 3 days old) and willing to participate in the study were placed in the case group. The control group consisted of women who had given birth to a full-term infant (37 weeks) and willing to participate in the study. We excluded all women who were not literate and were physically weak and unable to respond to the questions, as well as those who had congenital and genetic abnormalities diagnosed by pediatricians. New Ballard Score (NBS) was used to validate the infant's age at the time of birth.[16] To select the preterm infants, first, the infants who were diagnosed with last normal menstrual period were selected, and then, the final assessment of the infants was performed based on NBS (score 10–31), and newborns with a gestational age of 28–37 weeks were allocated in the case group.

Sampling method

Due to the fact that most deliveries in Bandar Abbas take place in two hospitals, Shariati and Children, these two hospitals were selected as the study site. Simple sampling method was used to select the samples in this study. The selection of samples in the control group was followed by the selection of a sample in the case group.

Sample size

Kelsey formula was used to estimate the sample size for the case and control groups.[10] Based on the results of Nia et al. study,[17] 400 women were enrolled in the study and divided into the case and control groups with a ratio of 1:1 (200 in case and 200 in control groups).

Quality control

Two of the research colleagues were trained in three sessions on subjects such as the process of entering people into the study, obtaining consent, completing the checklist, using NBS, accessing information and medical records, and research ethics. The checklist's data containing information such as history of maternal disease, preeclampsia, drug addiction, history of abortion and stillbirth, polyhydramnios, and placenta previa (according to the gynecologist and the information in the patient's medical record) were completed by interviewing the women and studying their medical records. The questions were designed with extensive review of related texts and applying the comments of experts. To determine the validity of checklist, an expert panel was used. For this purpose, the checklist was given to eight experts in the field and their comments were used to amend the checklist.

Data analysis

Data after the collection were entered into SPSS software version 16. To compare the risk factors in the two groups, conditional logistic regression was used. Furthermore, descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) were used to describe the data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of mothers in the case group was 28.3 ± 6.4 years and in the control group was 27.5 ± 5.9 years, and there was a significant difference between them in that regard (P = 0.032). Out of 200 preterm infants in this study, 114 were boys and 86 were girls, and among the full-term neonates, 90 were boys and 110 were girls. Furthermore, the maternal birth rate in the case group was 1.88 ± 1.07 and in the control group was 1.84 ± 1.16 [Table 1].
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics

variableGroupFrequency (percentage)P

Case (n=200)Control (n=200)
Mother’s educationBelow diploma96 (48)88 (44)0.668
Diploma66 (33)72 (36)
University38 (19)40 (20)
Husband’s education Below diploma90 (45)90 (45)0.843
Diploma72 (36)68 (34)
University38 (19)42 (21)
Place of residenceCity122 (61)118 (59)0.783
Village78 (39)82 (41)
EmploymentHousewife188 (94)194 (97)0.867
Employed12 (6)6 (3)
Socio-demographic characteristics According to the logistic regression model, in this study, the chance of preterm infant birth in mothers with the history of unwanted pregnancy was 0.327 (0.327–0.779) of the mothers with wanted pregnancy. Furthermore, the history of preeclampsia, preterm infant, placental abruption, premature rupture of membrane (PROM), history of placenta previa, and the cervical insufficiency increased the chance of preterm infant birth by 2.688 (1.164–6.207), 4.171 (1.483–11.728), 3.209 (1.209–8.519), 3.273 (1.745–6.137), 9.333 (2.086–41.770), and 11 (1.381–87.641) times, respectively. Moreover, women with the cesarean section and <7 times pregnancies had the chance of having a premature infant by 3.584 and 0.334, respectively [Table 2].
Table 2

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with preterm birth

VariableGroups Frequency (percent)Modified odds ratio OR (CI 95%)P

Case (n=200)Control (n=200)
Type of delivery (Current)C-section114 (57)54 (27)3.584 (1.981-6.485)<0.001
Natural86 (43)146 (73)
PreeclampsiaYes42 (21)18 (9)2.688 (1.164-6.207)0.028
No158 (79)182 (91)
History of premature infantYes36 (18)10 (5)4.171 (1.483-11.728)0.007
No164 (82)190 (95)
Placental abruptionYes34 (17)12 (6)3.209 (1.209-8.519)0.025
No166 (83)188 (94)
Premature rupture of membraneYes90 (45)40 (20)3.273 (1.745-6.137)<0.001
No110 (55)160 (80)
Placenta previaYes32 (16)4 (2)9.333 (2.086-41.770)<0.001
No168 (84)196 (98)
Number of prenatal cares≥7142 (71)176 (88)0.334 (0.159-0.701)0.005
<758 (29)24 (12)
Cervical insufficiencyYes20 (10)2 (1)11 (1.381-87.641)0.010
No180 (90)198 (99)
Type of pregnancyWanted158 (79)184 (92)0.327 (0.327-0.779)0.015
Unwanted42 (21)16 (8)
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with preterm birth In this study, the prevalence of polyhydramnios was estimated to be 1.5% in the case group and 1.8% in the control group (odds ratio = 4.5). The chance of preterm infant birth in mothers with a history of abortion and stillbirth was 2.1 times higher than mothers who did not have such problem. Furthermore, drug addiction increased the odds of preterm infant birth by 0.8 time, but no significant difference was observed in the three aforementioned variables (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that among factors related to PTB, type of pregnancy, preeclampsia, history of preterm infant, placenta abruption, PROM, history of placenta previa, number of prenatal care, cervical insufficiency, and type of delivery remained in the model using forward method and had a significant relationship with the PTB (P < 0.001).

Discussion

According to the results of this study, one of the factors that affected the birth of preterm infant was type of delivery. In the present study, the chance of preterm infant birth in mothers with cesarean delivery was 4 times more than in mothers with vaginal delivery. This is similar to the findings of Safari Moradabadi et al.[18] and Mokuolu et al.[19] studies. Studies have shown that vaginal delivery has no causal relationship with PTB. However, it can result in childbirth indication due to obstetric complications such as pregnancy-induced hypertension and antepartum hemorrhage as observed in this study.[71219] In this study, history of preeclampsia increased the chance of preterm infant birth by about 3 times. This result is consistent with the findings of other studies.[1120212223242526] Preeclampsia and eclampsia have been accepted as preventable and controllable diseases in today's world, and due to their relatively high prevalence and significant complications that they have for mother and fetus, they need to be considered more, because the early diagnosis and treatment of preeclampsia can have significant effects on the health of mother and infant.[27] In this study, prenatal care was another factor that affected the birth of the preterm infant. Mothers with insufficient prenatal care (<7) had a higher chance of having a preterm baby. This result is in line with the studies of Namakin et al.[21] and Nia et al.[17] The results of various studies indicate the role of prenatal care in reducing the risk of preterm infant birth.[122829] Therefore, it seems that prenatal care and identification of risk factors such as hypertension and blood sugar can be effective in reducing the birth of preterm infants. Dadipoor and Alavi. and Ratzon et al. refer to the role of insufficient care during pregnancy as one of the factors affecting the birth of preterm infant.[2030] Factors that may lead to inadequate prenatal care include the lack of free prenatal care services, particularly in the afternoon time for employed women, low numbers of health centers and crowded health centers due to staff shortages, inadequate education on how to perform prenatal care for physicians and midwives working in the private sector, and lack of adequate monitoring and supervision on how health-care professionals provide services in private clinics. The consequence of this problem, despite imposing significant cost of care in private sector on families, will increase the chance of preterm infant birth. Although no significant relationship was found between the history of abortion and stillbirth and the birth of preterm infant in the case and control groups, according to the results, the chance of preterm infant birth in mothers with a history of abortion and stillbirth was over 2 times of normal women. The relationship between the history of abortion and the increased risk of preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancies has been reported in various studies.[313233] Furthermore, abortion history has been reported as a risk factor for the birth of preterm infants in various cohort studies.[3334] This issue highlights the importance of paying special attention to high-risk mothers in need of intensive care. Based on the results of this study, one of the strongest risk factors for preterm infant birth was the history of preterm labor which increased the risk of preterm delivery in women with the history of this problem. Behrman's study pointed to the fact that history of preterm delivery increases the chance of preterm infant birth in subsequent pregnancies.[35] The results of this study are consistent with the findings of other studies in this regard.[3637] Based on the results of this study, the chance of having a preterm baby in mothers with a history of PROMs was 3 times more than mothers who had no history of this problem. Offiah et al. showed that the prevalence of preterm labor is higher in mothers with the history of PROM.[38] Other studies have also reported a higher chance of preterm infant birth in mothers with a history of PROMs.[72139] PROM is mainly due to infections and other harmful lifestyle behaviors such as smoking or drinking. Many studies have shown that infection is a major cause of preterm delivery.[4041] Although there was no relationship between drug addiction and the birth of a preterm infant in our research, the regression results showed that the chance of preterm infant birth in mothers who smoked was 1 time higher than healthy mothers. In other studies, smoking during pregnancy has been reported as a risk factor for preterm infant birth.[424344] In this regard, psychological interventions seem to be effective. In a systematic study, data collected from 14 studies showed that various types of psychological interventions can significantly reduce the rate of smoking in women during pregnancy.[45] Dadipoor et al. in a study referred to the shortage of pharmacological interventions,[46] while anti-drug laws have been having many benefits. A review of 11 studies related to national and local tobacco prohibition during pregnancy showed that this intervention has led to a 10% reduction in the birth of preterm infants.[47]

Limitations

The use of secondary data for some variables was another limitation of our study. Furthermore, only mothers who had alive birth and their babies who were evaluated for gestational age were interviewed in this study. The present study did not investigate the factors affecting the birth of dead preterm infants, and also, our study was limited to mothers who gave birth in hospital. In addition, convenience samples were another limitation on the generalizability of results.

Conclusions

The PTB risk is higher for women with cervical insufficiency, history of placenta previa, and history of preterm. Better management of these gynecological complications provides a practical way to reduce the high rate of preterm labor to elucidate the mechanisms that cause preterm labor.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was financially supported by Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  33 in total

1.  History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Ancel; Nathalie Lelong; Emile Papiernik; Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles; Monique Kaminski
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  Stacy Beck; Daniel Wojdyla; Lale Say; Ana Pilar Betran; Mario Merialdi; Jennifer Harris Requejo; Craig Rubens; Ramkumar Menon; Paul F A Van Look
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Smoking during pregnancy and preterm birth according to obstetric history: French national perinatal surveys.

Authors:  Cathy Nabet; Pierre-Yves Ancel; Antoine Burguet; Monique Kaminski
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Maternal smoking and causes of very preterm birth.

Authors:  Nina B Kyrklund-Blomberg; Fredrik Granath; Sven Cnattingius
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Maternal periodontal status and preterm delivery: a hospital based case-control study.

Authors:  J K Baskaradoss; A Geevarghese; V R Kutty
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.419

Review 6.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Is induced abortion with misoprostol a risk factor for late abortion or preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancies?

Authors:  Norbert Winer; Mathieu Resche-Rigon; Christine Morin; Yves Ville; Patrick Rozenberg
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000.

Authors:  Li Liu; Hope L Johnson; Simon Cousens; Jamie Perin; Susana Scott; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Richard Cibulskis; Mengying Li; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Risk factors for pre-term birth in Iraq: a case-control study.

Authors:  Samim A Al-Dabbagh; Wafa Y Al-Taee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos; Rafael Lozano; Mohsen Naghavi; Abraham D Flaxman; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Daphna Levinson; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Charles Mock; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Natasha Wiebe; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.