| Literature DB >> 34222145 |
William Morello1, Federica D'Amico2, Jessica Serafinelli1, Silvia Turroni2, Isabella Abati1, Jessica Fiori3, Esra Baskin4, Fatos Yalcinkaya5, Augustina Jankauskiene6, Marco Pennesi7, Aleksandra Zurowska8, Francesca Becherucci9, Dorota Drozdz10, Djalila Mekahli11,12, Grazyna Krzemien13, Claudio La Scola14, Katarzyna Taranta-Janusz15, Otto Mehls16, Franz Schaefer16, Marco Candela2, Giovanni Montini1,17.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis; children; gut microbiota; urinary tract infection; vesicoureteral reflux
Year: 2021 PMID: 34222145 PMCID: PMC8247656 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.674716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Clinical characteristic of enrolled patients.
| Gender | Males | 37 (72.5%) | 30 (83.3%) | 67 (77%) | 0.24 | 0.53 (0.18, 1.54) |
| Females | 14 (27.5%) | 6 (16.7%) | 20 (23%) | |||
| Age (months) | Median (IQR) | 3.6 (2.6-4.3) | 2.6 (1.7-3.53) | 3.1 (2.2-3.9) | ||
| Feeding modality | Breastfeeding | 30 (60.0%) | 28 (80.0%) | 58 (68.2%) | 0.14 | Breastfeeding vs. Formula0.54 (0.09, 3.16) |
| Mixed | 16 (32.0%) | 5 (14.3%) | 21 (24.7%) | |||
| Formula | 4 (8%) | 2 (5.7%) | 6 (7.1%) | |||
| Gestational age | Term | 45 (88.2%) | 34 (94.4%) | 79 (90.8%) | 0.53 | Term vs. Preterm0.53 (0.10, 2.90) |
| Preterm | 5 (9.8%) | 2 (5.6%) | 7 (8%) | |||
| Postterm | 1 (2%) | 0 | 1 (1.1%) | |||
| Probiotics consumption | Yes | 8 (15.7%) | 4 (11.1%) | 12 (13.8%) | 0.54 | 1.49 (0.41, 5.38) |
| No | 43 (84.3%) | 32 (88.9%) | 75 (86.2%) | |||
| Mode of delivery | Cesarean section | 27 (54.0%) | 6 (18.8%) | 33 (40.2%) | 5.09 (1.78, 14.50) | |
| Spontaneous delivery | 23 (46.0%) | 26 (81.2%) | 49 (59.8%) | |||
| Grade of VUR | Grade III | 13 (25.5%) | 8 (22.2%) | 21 (24.1%) | 0.37 | Grade III vs. IV/V1.20 (0.44, 3.28) |
| Grade IV | 18 (35.3%) | 18 (50%) | 36 (41.4%) | |||
| Grade V | 20 (39.2%) | 10 (27.8%) | 30 (34.5%) |
VUR, vesicoureteral reflux; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. P-values were obtained by Chi squared test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon test for continuous variables (significant values are reported in bold).
Figure 1The gut microbiota of infants exposed to CAP segregates from that of non-CAP infants. (A) Alpha diversity estimated according to Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity and the number of observed ASVs. No significant differences were found (p ≥ 0.2, Wilcoxon test). (B) Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distances between fecal samples. A significant separation between groups was observed (p = 0.015, permutation test with pseudo-F ratios). Ellipses include 95% confidence area based on the standard error of the weighted average of sample coordinates. Bacterial genera with the largest contribution to the ordination space are indicated with blue arrows (p ≤ 0.05, permutational correlation test, “envfit” function).
Figure 2The GM dysbiosis in CAP infants is independent of potential confounding factors. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distances between fecal samples from CAP vs. non-CAP infants, stratified by gender (male vs. female, A), age group (1-5 months, B), feeding modality (breastfeeding vs. formula vs. mixed, C), gestational age (term vs. preterm vs. postterm, D), probiotics consumption (yes vs. no, E), delivery mode (cesarean section vs. spontaneous delivery, F) VUR grade (grade III vs. IV vs. V, G), class of antibiotics (amoxicillin or amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, trimethoprim, oral cephalosporins, and nitrofurantoin, H) and geographical origin (Italian, Belgian, French, Lithuanian, Polish, Portuguese, and Turkish, I). No significant separation was found (p ≥ 0.118, permutation test with pseudo-F ratios). Ellipses include 95% confidence area based on the standard error of the weighted average of sample coordinates. See also Figure 1.
Figure 3Gut microbiota structure in CAP vs. non-CAP infants. (A,B) Bar plots representing the relative abundance of the major phyla (A) and families (B) in the GM of CAP and non-CAP infants. (C,D) Box plots showing the relative abundance distribution of bacterial families (C) and genera (D) with a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05, Wilcoxon test; asterisk) or a trend (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1; hashtag) between the two groups. Only taxa with relative abundance >0.1% in at least two samples were considered.