| Literature DB >> 34222051 |
Mengting Guo1, Ya Gao1, Yibing Xue1, Yuanping Liu1, Xiaoyan Zeng1, Yuqiang Cheng1, Jingjiao Ma1, Hengan Wang1, Jianhe Sun1, Zhaofei Wang1, Yaxian Yan1.
Abstract
Mastitis caused by Escherichia coli (E. coli) remains a threat to dairy animals and impacts animal welfare and causes great economic loss. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance and the lagged development of novel antibacterial drugs greatly challenge the livestock industry. Phage therapy has regained attention. In this study, three lytic phages, termed vB_EcoM_SYGD1 (SYGD1), vB_EcoP_SYGE1 (SYGE1), and vB_EcoM_SYGMH1 (SYGMH1), were isolated from sewage of dairy farm. The three phages showed a broad host range and high bacteriolytic efficiency against E. coli from different sources. Genome sequence and transmission electron microscope analysis revealed that SYGD1 and SYGMH1 belong to the Myoviridae, and SYGE1 belong to the Autographiviridae of the order Caudovirales. All three phages remained stable under a wide range of temperatures or pH and were almost unaffected in chloroform. Specially, a mastitis infected cow model, which challenged by a drug resistant E. coli, was used to evaluate the efficacy of phages. The results showed that the cocktails consists of three phages significantly reduced the number of bacteria, somatic cells, and inflammatory factors, alleviated the symptoms of mastitis in cattle, and achieved the same effect as antibiotic treatment. Overall, our study demonstrated that phage cocktail may be a promising alternative therapy against mastitis caused by drug resistant E. coli.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; cow mastitis; drug resistant; phage cocktails; therapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34222051 PMCID: PMC8248792 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.690377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
The host range and EOP of vB_EcoM_SYGD1, vB_EcoP_SYGE1, and vB_EcoM_SYGMH1.
| Bacterial No. | Source | vB_EcoM_SYGD1 | vB_EcoM_SYGE1 | vB_EcoM_SYGMH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spot test | EOP | Spot test | EOP | Spot test | EOP | ||
|
| I | — | — | ++ | 0.79 ± 0.03 | — | — |
|
| I | ++ | 1.00 | ++ | 1.00 | ++ | 1.00 |
|
| II | ++ | 0.66 ± 0.03 | + | 0.07 ± 0.00 | ++ | 0.20 ± 0.02 |
|
| II | ++ | 0.94 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.40 ± 0.02 | ++ | 1.19 ± 0.02 |
|
| II | + | 0.10 ± 0.01 | + | 0.11 ± 0.01 | ++ | 0.34 ± 0.02 |
|
| II | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| II | ++ | 0.36 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.26 ± 0.01 | + | 0.09 ± 0.01 |
|
| II | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| II | ++ | 0.29 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.29 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.31 ± 0.02 |
|
| II | ++ | 0.27 ± 0.03 | ++ | 0.30 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.21 ± 0.02 |
|
| II | + | 0.02 ± 0.00 | + | 0.21 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
|
| II | ++ | 0.74 ± 0.03 | ++ | 0.41 ± 0.01 | ++ | 0.49 ± 0.03 |
|
| II | ++ | 0.48 ± 0.04 | ++ | 0.28 ± 0.01 | ++ | 0.26 ± 0.00 |
|
| II | — | — | ++ | 0.33 ± 0.02 | — | — |
|
| III | + | 0.11 ± 0.02 | + | 0.19 ± 0.02 | + | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
|
| III | ++ | 0.42 ± 0.02 | ++ | 0.49 ± 0.01 | ++ | 0.62 ± 0.06 |
|
| III | — | — | + | 0.21 ± 0.02 | — | — |
|
| III | — | — | + | 0.17 ± 0.01 | — | — |
|
| III | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| III | — | — | — | — | — | — |
I, purchased from American Type Culture Collection; II, hospital-acquired strains; III, clinically-isolated strains from the milk of dairy cows with mastitis.
++, clear plaque; +, hazy plaque, and -, no plaque.
EOP, efficiency of plating (EOP = phage titre on test bacterium/phage titre on strains MC1061). The EOP values are shown as the mean of the three repeats ± SD. -, no plaque on target bacterium.
Figure 1Images of phage particles by transmission electron microscopy. (A) vB_EcoM_SYGD1. (B) vB_EcoP_SYGE1. (C) vB_EcoM_SYGMH1 (scale bar was 50 nm).
Figure 2Genome features of vB_EcoM_SYGD1, vB_EcoP_SYGE1 and vB_EcoM_SYGMH1. Their predicated ORFs and their orientations are represented by arrows. The function modules are shown in different colors.
Figure 3The optimal MOI and one-step growth curve of phages. (A) vB_EcoM_SYGD1, vB_EcoP_SYGE1, and vB_EcoM_SYGMH1 infected their host strain at an MOI of 0.01 or 10, reaching their peak titer, indicating the most suitable concentration for lysing bacteria. (B) SYGD1, SYGE1, and SYGMH1 infected their host strains at the optimal MOI. The supernatants were harvested at 10 min intervals post-infection, and titers were determined using the double-layer method.
Figure 4Stability of vB_EcoM_SYGD1, vB_EcoP_SYGE1, and vB_EcoM_SYGMH1 under various conditions. (A) Temperature. (B) pH stability. (C) UV radiation stability. (D) Chloroform sensitivity. Survived phage particles were determined by double-layer tests. Error bars show the SEM among triplicate samples.
Figure 5Antibacterial efficacy of phage cocktails against mastitis induced by E.coli. Cows challenged by E.coli-induced mastitis were intramammarily infused with phage cocktails containing vB_EcoM_SYGD1, vB_EcoP_SYGE1, and vB_EcoM_SYGMH1, and the bacteria load (A) and SCC (B) of milk samples were detected after three-day treatment, every 24 h. Concentrations of IL-1β (C) and TNF-α (D) in the sera of cows before treatment (0 day) and on the sixth day after beginning of treatment were measured using indirect ELISA. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v 8.0 software. *Indicate significant differences between phage cocktails or antibiotics and untreated groups, as calculated by t-tests (p < 0.05).
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of E. coli strains used in this study.
| Strains | AMP | FEP | GEN | KM | CIP | NOR | MEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG1655 | |||||||
| MC1061 | |||||||
| DG03512 | |||||||
| Min27 | |||||||
| ECS1 | |||||||
| ECS2 | |||||||
| ECS3 | |||||||
| ECS4 | |||||||
| ECS5 | |||||||
| ECS6 | |||||||
| ECS7 | |||||||
| ECS8 | |||||||
| ECS9 | |||||||
| ECS10 | |||||||
| ECD1 | |||||||
| ECD2 | |||||||
| ECD3 | |||||||
| ECD4 | |||||||
| ECD5 | |||||||
| ECD6 |
AMP, Ampicillin; FEP, Cefepime; GEN, Gentamicin; KM, Kanamycin; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; NOR, Norfloxacin; MEM, Meropenem.