| Literature DB >> 34222048 |
Shanshan Li1, Shi Huang2, Yi Guo3, Ying Zhang1, Lijuan Zhang4, Fan Li1, Kaixuan Tan5, Jie Lu5, Zhenggang Chen5, Qingyuan Guo5, Yongping Tang5, Fei Teng6, Fang Yang1,5.
Abstract
Dental caries is one of the most prevalent chronic oral diseases, affecting approximately half of children worldwide. The microbial composition of dental caries may depend on age, oral health, diet, and geography, yet the effect of geography on these microbiomes is largely underexplored. Here, we profiled and compared saliva microbiota from 130 individuals aged 6 to 8 years old, representing both healthy children (H group) and children with caries-affected (C group) from two geographical regions of China: a northern city (Qingdao group) and a southern city (Guangzhou group). First, the saliva microbiota exhibited profound differences in diversity and composition between the C and H groups. The caries microbiota featured a lower alpha diversity and more variable community structure than the healthy microbiota. Furthermore, the relative abundance of several genera (e.g., Lactobacillus, Gemella, Cryptobacterium and Mitsuokella) was significantly higher in the C group than in the H group (p<0.05). Next, geography dominated over disease status in shaping salivary microbiota, and a wide array of salivary bacteria was highly predictive of the individuals' city of origin. Finally, we built a universal diagnostic model based on 14 bacterial species, which can diagnose caries with 87% (AUC=86.00%) and 85% (AUC=91.02%) accuracy within each city and 83% accuracy across cities (AUC=92.17%). Although the detection rate of Streptococcus mutans in populations is not very high, it could be regarded as a single biomarker to diagnose caries with decent accuracy. These findings demonstrated that despite the large effect size of geography, a universal model based on salivary microbiota has the potential to diagnose caries across the Chinese child population.Entities:
Keywords: caries; diagnosis models; geography; mixed dentition; saliva microbiota
Year: 2021 PMID: 34222048 PMCID: PMC8250437 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.680288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Experimental design that sampled saliva microbiome from caries-affected children and healthy controls in the two Chinese cities of Qingdao and Guangzhou. Unstimulated saliva microbiota from 130 individuals (Qingdao, n=96; Guangzhou, n=34) were compared.
Figure 2Oral microbial diversity comparisons between caries and healthy children in Qingdao cohort. (A) Salivary microbiota variation was compared within and between disease status (i.e., H or C), or gender based on the Jensen-Shannon distances. Only disease status exhibits a strong effect on the composition of saliva microbiota (F=3.20**). (B) Caries-free children have more conservative microbiota than do children with caries (**p<0.01). (C) Alpha diversity comparisons between the C and H groups using on Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou’s evenness index. Indices showed that, the alpha-diversity values from the caries-affected samples were significantly decreased than those in healthy samples (Shannon, *p=0.041; Simpson, *p=0.046; Pielou’s evenness, *p=0.02).
Figure 3The remarkable impact of city of origin on oral microbiomes. (A) The effect size of geography, gender and host’s disease status on saliva microbiota based on Jensen-Shannon distance. The city of origin exhibited the strongest effect on bacterial composition of the saliva microbiome, followed by host status and gender factor. (B) Beta-diversity difference between Qingdao and Guangzhou groups measured by JSD distances. (C) Alpha diversity difference between Qingdao and Guangzhou groups measured by Shannon index.
Figure 4The strong geographical background of the healthy oral microbiota and key drivers. (A) Microbiome can classify the city of origin of healthy samples with a high accuracy. We utilized the Random Forests machine learning algorithm to quantify the city-associated difference in the saliva microbiota from healthy population. City (Qingdao and Guangzhou, China) can be distinguished with high AUC in the random forests model. And the healthy microbiota can predict city-origin with high accuracy (AUC=97.30%). (B) Box plot indicates the prediction probability of Guangzhou city in healthy samples. The probability of Guangzhou was significantly higher in the Guangzhou samples than in the Qingdao samples in H group. (C) Relationship between the numbers of variables used in the reduced models and the corresponding predictive performance (the error bar denotes SD). (D) The importance score of eight the most discriminating species in the diagnosis model to predict city origin. The bar length at each row indicates relative contribution of the species to the RF model.
Figure 5Caries diagnostic models based on oral microbiome detrended for geography. We constructed caries diagnostic models using 130 oral microbial species from both Qingdao and Guangzhou populations. (A) Saliva microbiota can predict caries status with a remarkably high accuracy (AUC=88.99%). (B) The relationship between the numbers of variables used in the reduced Random Forest model and the corresponding predictive performance (the error bar denotes SD). (C) The most caries-discriminatory taxa (N=14) do not correlate with geography. The scatterplot shows the relative rank of microbial markers in both Random Forest models for classifying disease status and geographic locations. Any dots on the reference line which slope=1 suggests a taxon is equally important to both disease states and geography.
Figure 6Cross-applications of caries diagnosis models based on microbiomes from Qingdao and Guangzhou cohorts. We constructed caries diagnosis models in the saliva microbiota from either Qingdao or Guangzhou population. Using either Qingdao or Guangzhou microbiota, status (heathy and caries) can be distinguished with a high prediction accuracy (AUC) in the 10-fold CV for random forests model. (A) The prediction performance of models in the Qingdao (AUC=91.02%, Guangzhou (AUC=86.16%) and model application from one city to another. A classification model trained in Qingdao data and tested in Guangzhou Data resulting in a AUC=87.00%; A classification model trained in Guangzhou data and tested in Qingdao Data resulting in a AUC=89.00%. (B) The predictive performance using data from two cities (AUC=92.17%).