| Literature DB >> 34221867 |
Lili Ding1,2, Qiaoling Yang1,2,3, Eryun Zhang1,2, Yangmeng Wang2, Siming Sun2, Yingbo Yang1, Tong Tian1, Zhengcai Ju1, Linshan Jiang1, Xunjiang Wang1, Zhengtao Wang1, Wendong Huang2,4, Li Yang1,5.
Abstract
Obesity and its associated complications are highly related to a current public health crisis around the world. A growing body of evidence has indicated that G-protein coupled bile acid (BA) receptor TGR5 (also known as Gpbar-1) is a potential drug target to treat obesity and associated metabolic disorders. We have identified notoginsenoside Ft1 (Ft1) from Panax notoginseng as an agonist of TGR5 in vitro. However, the pharmacological effects of Ft1 on diet-induced obese (DIO) mice and the underlying mechanisms are still elusive. Here we show that Ft1 (100 mg/100 diet) increased adipose lipolysis, promoted fat browning in inguinal adipose tissue and induced glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion in the ileum of wild type but not Tgr5 -/- obese mice. In addition, Ft1 elevated serum free and taurine-conjugated bile acids (BAs) by antagonizing Fxr transcriptional activities in the ileum to activate Tgr5 in the adipose tissues. The metabolic benefits of Ft1 were abolished in Cyp27a1 -/- mice which have much lower BA levels. These results identify Ft1 as a single compound with opposite activities on two key BA receptors to alleviate high fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice.Entities:
Keywords: ANOVA, analysis of variance; AUC, area under the curve; BAT, brown adipose tissue; BAs, bile acids; Bile acids; DIO, diet-induced obesity; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; FXR; Ft1, notoginsenoside Ft1; Fxr, nuclear farnesoid X receptor; GLP-1; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GTT, glucose tolerance test; HFD, high fat diet; ITT, insulin tolerance test; Insulin resistance; KO, knockout; Metabolic disorders; Notoginsenoside Ft1; Obesity; TGR5; Tgr5, membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptor; Ucp, uncoupling protein; Wt, wild-type; cAMP, adenosine 3′,5′ cyclic monophosphate; eWAT, epididymal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue
Year: 2021 PMID: 34221867 PMCID: PMC8245856 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1Ft1 improves body weight and hepatic steatohepatitis of DIO mice through activation of Tgr5. (A) Chemical structure of Ft1. (B) TGR5 luciferase reporter activities of Ft1. (C) cAMP elicited by Ft1 after binding to the TGR5 and intracellular cAMP levels were measured by luminescence. Wt and Tgr5−/− (KO) mice were fed with HFD to induce obesity, and then treated with Ft1 for 6 weeks. (D) Body weight and (E) food intake of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 treatment. (F) Liver/bodyweight ratio (G) iWAT weight and (H) oil red staining of liver sections and H&E staining of iWAT sections in both Wt and Tgr5 mice at 6th week after Ft1 treatment. Values are mean ± SD (n = 6 per group), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. vehicle by two tailed Student's t test for panels A–C. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test for panels D–G. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 2Ft1 mediated improvement of glucose homeostasis in DIO mice is dependent on Tgr5. GTT at time point of 0–120 min and area under the curve (AUC) of (A) Wt and (B) Tgr5 mice after intraperitoneal (ip) injection with 2.0 g/kg d-glucose, ITT at time point 0–120 min and area under curve (AUC) of (C) Wt and (D) Tgr5 KO mice after ip injection with 0.75 U/kg insulin. (E) Fasting blood glucose levels and (F) blood insulin levels of Wt and Tgr5 mice at 6 weeks after Ft1 treatment. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test.
Figure 3Ft1 induces GLP-1 secretion and increases energy expenditure of DIO mice by activation of Tgr5. GLP-1 production and the AUC of (A) Wt and (B) Tgr5 mice. (C) Energy expenditure over 24 h period, (D) O2 consumption over light phase and dark phase, (E) the average energy expenditure, and (F) the average oxygen consumption over 24 h period in Wt and Tgr5 mice at 6th week after Ft1 treatment. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group for panels A and B, n = 5 per group for panels C to F), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test.
Figure 4Ft1 promotes lipolysis and thermogenesis in DIO mice through activation of Tgr5. (A) The protein amounts of PKA substrates, HSL and phosphorylation of HSL in inguinal fat of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 administration. (B) Blood glycerol level of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 treatment. The mRNA levels of energy expenditure associated genes in (C) iWAT and (D) BAT of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 treatment. (E) UCP1 immunofluorescence staining of iWAT and BAT sections from Wt and Tgr5 mice treated with Ft1. Blue, DAPI; Green, UCP1. Scale bar, 100 μm. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group for panels A, C and D, n = 8 for panel B), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test.
Figure 5Ft1 is an FXR antagonist and enhances hepatic bile acids synthesis in DIO mice. (A) Taurine-conjugated BAs, glycine-conjugated BAs, unconjugated BAs and (B) total BAs in serum of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 treatment. (C) Relative mRNA expression of Fxr and its target genes in ileum (D) serum FGF15 amounts and (E) relative mRNA expressions of Fxr and its target genes in liver of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 treatment. (F) Luciferase activity were assayed (G) SHP (H) FGF19 and (I) IBABP mRNA expressions of differentiated Caco2 cells after treatment with 100 μmol/L CDCA with 10 μmol/L Ft1, expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA. Values are mean ± SD (n = 6 per group), ∗∗P < 0.01 compared to vehicle, #P < 0.05 compared to GW4064 by two tailed Student's t test for panels F–I. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test for panels A–E.
Figure 6The metabolic benefits induced by Ft1 are lost in Cyp27a1 mice. Wt and Cyp27a1−/− mice were fed with HFD to lead obesity, and then treated with Ft1 for additional 6 weeks. (A) Body weight and food intake of Wt and Cyp27a1−/− mice after Ft1 treatment. (B) Liver/bodyweight ratio, iWAT weight of both Wt and Tgr5 mice at 6th week after Ft1 treatment. (C) Oil red staining of liver sections and (D) H&E staining of iWAT sections from Wt and Tgr5 mice at 6 weeks after Ft1 treatment. (E) IPGTT curve during 0–120 min and AUC of Wt and Cyp27a1 mice after ip injection with 2.0 g/kg d-glucose. (F) IPITT curve during 0–120 min and AUC of Wt and Cyp27a1−/− mice after ip injection with 0.75 U/kg insulin. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 7Ft1 mediated thermogenesis is abolished in Cyp27a1 mice. (A) GLP-1 release at indicated time point and AUC of Wt and Cyp27a1 mice. (B) BAs profile in WT and Cyp27a1 mice after Ft1 treatment. (C) The protein amounts of HSL and phosphorylation of HSL in inguinal fat of Wt and Tgr5 mice after Ft1 administration. (D) Blood glycerol level of Wt and Cyp27a1 mice after Ft1 treatment. (E) Cold intolerance in Wt and Cyp27a1 mice was measured before and at 1, 2, and 3 h after cold exposure (4 °C), mouse rectal body temperatures were measured using a ThermoScan thermometer. (F) Energy expenditure associated genes in iWAT of Wt and Cyp27a1 mice after Ft1 treatment. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group for panels A to E, n = 5 for panel F), ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. HFD group by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-test.
Figure 8Mechanisms of Ft1 on improvement of obesity and insulin resistance. Ft1 activates intestinal Tgr5 to enhance intestinal GLP-1 release and improves glucose homeostasis. Furthermore, Ft1 increases the hepatic BA production by suppressing intestinal Fxr–Fgf15 axis. The elevated serum BA levels subsequently activate Tgr5 in adipose tissues to increase energy expenditure, thereby conferring beneficial metabolic effects in obese mice.