| Literature DB >> 34221493 |
Guangxin Wang1, Jian Gao1, Wenjuan Yu1, Yang Li1, Rongfeng Liao1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the peripapillary vessel density (pVD) and the peripapillary nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in patients with chiasmal compression caused by sellar region mass using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34221493 PMCID: PMC8219428 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5588077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Figure 1A rectangle scanning area of 4.54.5 mm centered on the optic nerve head was measured. (a) The software automatically divides the round annular area, which was defined as peripapillary, into eight sectors, including nasal superior (NS), nasal inferior (NI), inferior nasal (IN), inferior tempo (IT), tempo inferior (TI), tempo superior (TS), superior tempo (ST), and superior nasal (SN). (b) The software evaluated the peripapillary vessel density (pVD) and RNFL thickness of the radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC) layer, which extends from the layer between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) to RNFL. The color map shows the vessel density (c) and the RNFL thickness (d). (e) The vessel density and RNFL thickness of each sector were quantified.
Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with and without absolute central defect and the healthy control.
| Sellar tumor overall | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST versus 3 | 1 versus 3 | 2 versus 3 | 1 versus 2 | |||||
| Patients ( | 31 | 19 | 12 | 34 | — | — | — | — |
| Eyes ( | 31 | 19 | 12 | 34 | — | — | — | — |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Female ( | 17 | 11 | 6 | 13 | — | — | — | — |
| Male ( | 14 | 8 | 6 | 21 | 0.180 | 0.168 | 0.477 | 0.667 |
| Age (years) | 48.94 ± 14.31 | 52.95 ± 15.12 | 42.58 ± 10.63 | 50.15 ± 8.24 | 0.682 | 0.462 |
|
|
| BCVA; logMAR | 0.36 ± 0.48 | 0.43 ± 0.44 | 0.26 ± 0.56 | 0.04 ± 0.05 |
|
|
| 0.306 |
Group 1, patients with an absolute defect in the central visual field. Group 2, patients without an absolute defect in the central visual field. Group 3, healthy controls. ST = sellar tumor. BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity. Bold values are statistically significant values (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Samples from a healthy control subject and three cases with visual field defect of different degrees. (a) Visual field measured by Semiquantitative 07 Standard program. There was an absolute defect in the central visual field in case C, while A and B mainly involved the peripheral visual field. The color map and en face OCTA of vessel density (a) and RNFL thickness (b) of each sample are shown in the figure. The color maps suggest that the pVD and pRNFL thickness of patients with more severe visual field defects are significantly decreased.
Comparison of pVD and pRNFL thickness between the patients and the healthy controls.
| Sellar tumor | Healthy control |
|
| AUC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pVD (%) | 49.34 ± 6.64 | 53.31 ± 2.21 | −3.174 |
|
|
| Nasal superior | 46.20 (41.70–49.50) | 49.60 (48.55–53.15) | −3.646 |
|
|
| Nasal inferior | 44.80(37.50–49.80) | 49.40 (45.83–51.65) | −2.844 |
|
|
| Inferior nasal | 51.80 (48.10–55.30) | 53.75 (51.23–56.10) | −1.688 | 0.091 | 0.622 (0.091) |
| Inferior tempo | 58.20 (54.70–61.50) | 59.70 (57.08–61.83) | −1.268 | 0.205 | 0.592 (0.205) |
| Tempo inferior | 48.66 ± 8.11 | 53.92 ± 3.98 | −3.267 |
|
|
| Tempo superior | 54.20 (49.00–58.00) | 57.70 (53.58–60.13) | −2.227 |
|
|
| Superior tempo | 54.50 (49.20–60.20) | 56.15 (53.30–58.75) | −1.169 | 0.242 | 0.584 (0.242) |
| Superior nasal | 51.50 (46.90–53.70) | 51.95 (48.28–55.08) | −1.104 | 0.270 | 0.580 (0.270) |
|
| |||||
| pRNFL thickness ( | 103.45 ± 20.69 | 118.41 ± 9.48 | −3.689 |
|
|
| Nasal superior | 96.03 ± 23.35 | 112.94 ± 15.73 | −3.391 |
|
|
| Nasal inferior | 80.00 (64.00–93.00) | 91.50 (83.00–99.50) | −2.372 |
|
|
| Inferior nasal | 129.06 ± 26.21 | 154.91 ± 24.13 | −4.140 |
|
|
| Inferior tempo | 141.71 ± 29.87 | 156.53 ± 16.30 | −2.450 |
|
|
| Tempo inferior | 67.61 ± 19.82 | 77.50 ± 13.43 | −2.332 |
|
|
| Tempo superior | 73.00 (58.00–93.00) | 81.50 (75.00–88.25) | −1.426 | 0.154 | 0.603 (0.154) |
| Superior tempo | 125.00 (112.00–146.00) | 141.50 (123.75–149.00) | −1.596 | 0.110 | 0.615 (0.111) |
| Superior nasal | 121.32 ± 33.19 | 144.38 ± 25.21 | −3.171 |
|
|
pVD = peripapillary vessel density. pRNFL thickness = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Bold values are statistically significant values (p < 0.05).
Figure 3p value of the comparison of pVD (a) and pRNFL thickness (b) in eight sectors between patients with chiasmal compression caused by sellar tumor and healthy controls. Significant decreases in pVD were observed in the NS, NI, TI, and TS sectors (p < 0.05). Statistically significant thinning of the RNFL thickness was observed except for the TS and ST sectors.
Correlations between pVD and pRNFL thickness in corresponding sectors of patients.
| VD (%) | RNFL thickness ( | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Peripapillary | 0.779 |
|
| Nasal superior | 0.674 |
|
| Nasal inferior | 0.608 |
|
| Inferior nasal | 0.295 | 0.107 |
| Inferior tempo | 0.267 | 0.146 |
| Tempo inferior | 0.647 |
|
| Tempo superior | 0.811 |
|
| Superior tempo | 0.229 | 0.215 |
| Superior nasal | 0.630 |
|
VD = vessel density. RNFL thickness = retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Bold values are statistically significant values (p < 0.05).
Comparison of pVD and pRNFL thickness between patients with or without absolute central visual deficit and healthy controls.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pVD (%) | 47.39 ± 7.48 | 52.42 ± 3.42 | 53.31 ± 2.21 |
|
| 0.273 |
| pRNFL thickness ( | 96.63 ± 18.61 | 114.25 ± 19.82 | 118.41 ± 9.48 |
|
| 0.178 |
Group 1, patients with an absolute defect in the central visual field. Group 2, patients without an absolute defect in the central visual field. Group 3, healthy controls. pVD = peripapillary vessel density. pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. Bold values are statistically significant values (p < 0.05).
Multivariate linear regression analysis of the effects of tumor diameter and symptom duration on BCVA, pVD, and pRNFL thickness.
| BCVA | pVD | pRNFL thickness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Transverse diameter | −0.050 | 0.058 | −0.074 | 0.849 | 0.947 | 0.418 |
| Anteroposterior diameter | −0.021 | 0.366 | −0.139 | 0.686 | −0.781 | 0.449 |
| Vertical diameter | 0.051 |
| −0.098 | 0.772 | −0.876 | 0.390 |
| Symptom duration | −0.001 | 0.935 | 0.065 | 0.618 | 0.498 | 0.208 |
BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity. pVD = peripapillary vessel density. pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. Bold values are statistically significant values (p < 0.05).
Comparison of pVD and pRNLF thickness in patients with and without cavernous sinus invasion.
| CS invasion | No CS invasion |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pVD | 49.83 ± 5.16 | 49.07 ± 7.44 | 0.030 | 0.863 |
| pRNFL | 102.00 ± 16.92 | 104.25 ± 22.87 | 0.208 | 0.652 |
CS = cavernous sinus. pVD = peripapillary vessel density. pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer.