| Literature DB >> 34221113 |
Qian Cong1,2, Xiaojie Shi1, Ju Wang1, Yu Xiong1, Bo Su3, Lei Jiang3, Ming Li4, Weijun Tian1.
Abstract
When legged robots walk on rugged roads, they would suffer from strong impact from the ground. The impact would cause the legged robots to vibrate, which would affect their normal operation. Therefore, it is necessary to take measures to absorb impact energy and reduce vibration. As an important part of a goat's foot, the hoof capsule can effectively buffer the impact from the ground in the goat's running and jumping. The structure of the hoof capsules and its principle of buffering and vibration reduction were studied. Inspired by the unique shape and internal structure of the hoof capsules, a bionic foot was designed. Experimental results displayed that the bionic foot could effectively use friction to consume impact energy and ensured the stability of legged robot walking. In addition, the bionic foot had a lower natural vibration frequency, which was beneficial to a wide range of vibration reduction. This work brings a new solution to the legged robot to deal with the ground impact, which helps it adapt to a variety of complex terrain.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34221113 PMCID: PMC8211519 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5510993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Figure 1The picture of the goats' hoof capsules: the bottom (a) and the top (b).
Figure 2The design and bionic prototype of foot sole:(a) the touchdown contour of nails and (b) the bionic foot sole.
Figure 3SEM pictures: the hoof capsules (a), the inclined holes in the hoof capsules (b), the diameter of the inclined holes (c), and the bottom of hoof capsules (d).
Figure 4The schematic diagram: the bionic cushion (a) and the angle of oblique holes (b).
Figure 5The bionic foot: the unassembled model (a) and the assembled model (b).
Figure 6Ordinary robot foot.
Material parameters of bionic cushion, bionic foot sole, ground, and mass block.
| Model | Modulus of elasticity (MPa) | Poisson's ratio | Density (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bionic cushion | 7.84 | 0.47 | 1200 |
| Foot sole | 2.1 × 105 | 0.3 | 7800 |
| The ground | 4 × 104 | 0.25 | 2500 |
| Mass block | 2.1 × 105 | 0.3 | 50000 |
Figure 7Kinetic energy-time curves of different robot feet.
Figure 8Time curves of frictional dissipation energy of different robot feet.
Figure 9Time curves of ground impact force of different robot feet.
Figure 10The displacement curves of the mass block on the bionic feet and the ordinary foot after impact.
Figure 11Natural frequencies of the bionic feet and ordinary foot varying with orders.
Participation coefficients of all vibration modes of the ordinary foot.
| Mode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.57566 | −8.06 | 0.65584 | −2.29 | 2.18 | 2.01 |
| 2 | 0.65584 | 1.95 | -0.57566 | 2.01 | 1.60 | 2.29 |
| 3 | 2.02 | −2.36 | −1.84 | 4.20 | 1.16 | 4.13 |
| 4 | 4.92 | 1.00 | 1.93 | −1.79 | 7.48 | −1.76 |
| 5 | −6.19 | −1.52 | −7.35 | −2.30 | −2.39 | 4.88 |
| 6 | 6.96 | 1.56 | −6.66 | −5.05 | 6.87 | −7.83 |
| 7 | −3.01 | −1.61 | −3.07 | −4.48 | −1.07 | 5.06 |
| 8 | −3.04 | −1.45 | 3.04 | 5.08 | −1.08 | 4.98 |
| 9 | 8.59 | 8.22 | 8.66 | 1.06 | 3.05 | −1.03 |
| 10 | 8.64 | 7.10 | −8.63 | −1.03 | 2.62 | −1.09 |
Participation coefficients of all vibration modes of the bionic foot with 90° inclined holes.
| Mode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.53999 | 8.71 | 0.75897 | −2.65 | 3.68 | −1.88 |
| 2 | 0.75896 | −1.63 | 0.53999 | −1.88 | 2.30 | 2.65 |
| 3 | −2.52 | −2.73 | 3.25 | 4.87 | 1.13 | 4.79 |
| 4 | −3.39 | 1.122 | −8.44 | −2.00 | 1.81 | −1.97 |
| 5 | −2.01 | −1.69 | 2.03 | 3.01 | −3.38 | 2.96 |
| 6 | 4.92 | −8.08 | −7.04 | −1.95 | −3.56 | −1.14 |
| 7 | −7.03 | 9.64 | −4.93 | −1.14 | −2.12 | 1.95 |
| 8 | −1.07 | −5.36 | 1.81 | 1.50 | 1.49 | 1.27 |
| 9 | −1.49 | 3.41 | 9.02 | −6.07 | 3.82 | −5.97 |
| 10 | 1.85 | 5.20 | 2.49 | 7.73 | 7.65 | −6.28 |
Participation coefficients of all vibration modes of the bionic foot with 60° inclined holes.
| Mode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.99313 | 1.69 | 0.38694 | −9.03 | 2.45 | 3.81 |
| 2 | -0.38693 | −2.33 | 0.99313 | −3.81 | 1.05 | −9.03 |
| 3 | 6.34 | -0.19575 | −2.51 | 3.49 | 1.09 | 3.43 |
| 4 | 4.37 | 1.1251 | 8.29 | −2.01 | 1.49 | −1.97 |
| 5 | -0.31171 | −2.83 | 0.36829 | 9.73 | 8.98 | 3.19 |
| 6 | 0.36827 | −5.76 | 0.31159 | 3.20 | 1.20 | −9.71 |
| 7 | 1.39 | 9.18 | 7.17 | −1.62 | 1.82 | −1.62 |
| 8 | −7.79 | 1.12 | 1.93 | 9.91 | −1.05 | 1.32 |
| 9 | −2.04 | 1.33 | −7.79 | −1.36 | −1.73 | 1.01 |
| 10 | −4.37 | −9.85 | 1.38 | 4.80 | 1.48 | 1.40 |
Participation coefficients of all vibration modes of the bionic foot with 30° inclined holes.
| Mode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.74848 | 1.09 | 0.53125 | −1.69 | 2.27 | 3.48 |
| 2 | -0.53126 | −1.00 | 0.74849 | −3.48 | 3.65 | −1.69 |
| 3 | 4.60 | -0.27758 | 5.75 | 4.95 | 1.03 | 4.87 |
| 4 | −5.27 | 1.0762 | −4.47 | −1.92 | 2.10 | −1.89 |
| 5 | 0.47678 | 1.66 | 0.17528 | −1.16 | 1.16 | −9.12 |
| 6 | 0.17526 | 1.42 | -0.47668 | −9.12 | −5.23 | 1.16 |
| 7 | −3.48 | 5.77 | −5.28 | −1.43 | −1.35 | −9.43 |
| 8 | −3.96 | 3.18 | −8.42 | −8.59 | −2.18 | 9.57 |
| 9 | 8.41 | 4.06 | −3.95 | −9.62 | 8.07 | −8.53 |
| 10 | 3.63 | 7.08 | 1.78 | −1.26 | 3.27 | −1.24 |