| Literature DB >> 34220957 |
Xiaojian Ni1,2, Wenze Wan1,2, Jingjing Ma3, Xinyou Liu4, Bohao Zheng1,2, Zhixian He5, Weige Yang1,2,4, Lihong Huang2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD39 is one of the functional surface markers for T regulatory cells, the prognostic role and immune-related effects of CD39 in luminal breast cancer (BC) patients has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the current study was to explore the association between CD39 expression and clinic pathological characteristics and the prognosis in luminal BC patients.Entities:
Keywords: The Cancer Genome Atlas; breast cancer; nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1; prognosis; tumor immunology
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220957 PMCID: PMC8250154 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.682503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Flow chart indicating the study design of the present work.
Clinical characteristics of TCGA-BRCA level 3 cohort.
| Characteristics | Variable | Numbers of cases (%) |
| CD39 | Low | 213 (48.52) |
| High | 226 (51.48) | |
| Ethnicity | HISPANIC OR LATINO | 19 (4.33) |
| NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO | 328 (74.72) | |
| NA | 89 (20.27) | |
| Not evaluated | 2 (0.46) | |
| Unknown | 1 (0.23) | |
| Age | <60 | 230 (52.39) |
| ≥60 | 209 (47.61) | |
| Sex | Female | 434 (98.86) |
| Male | 5 (1.14) | |
| Histological type | Infiltrating ductal carcinoma | 292 (66.51) |
| Infiltrating lobular carcinoma | 101 (23.01) | |
| Other | 46 (10.48) | |
| ER | Negative | 9 (2.05) |
| Positive | 430 (97.95) | |
| PR | Indeterminate | 1 (0.23) |
| Negative | 64 (14.58) | |
| Positive | 374 (85.19) | |
| HER2 | Negative | 437 (99.54) |
| Positive | 2 (0.46) | |
| T classification | T1 | 117 (26.65) |
| T2 | 246 (56.04) | |
| T3 | 63 (14.35) | |
| T4 | 12 (2.73) | |
| TX | 1 (0.23) | |
| M classification | M0 | 374 (85.19) |
| M1 | 4 (0.91) | |
| MX | 59 (13.44) | |
| NA | 2 (0.46) | |
| N classification | N0 | 207 (47.15) |
| N1 | 145 (33.03) | |
| N2 | 53 (12.07) | |
| N3 | 29 (6.61) | |
| NX | 5 (1.14) | |
| Stage | I | 78 (17.77) |
| II | 247 (56.26) | |
| III | 103 (23.46) | |
| IV | 4 (0.91) | |
| NA | 4 (0.91) | |
| X | 3 (0.68) | |
| Vital status | Alive | 401 (91.34) |
| Dead | 38 (8.66) |
FIGURE 2Differences in CD39 expression were shown in boxplots according to patient age (A), histological type (B), PR (C), ER (D), HER-2 (E), molecular subtype (F), T classification (G), N classification (H), M classification (I) clinical stage (J), lymph node status(K), and vital status (L).
FIGURE 3(A) Box plots exhibiting the ASORA2A, ADORA2B, ASORA3, and CD39 (ENTPD1) expression in tumor (red) and normal tissues (blue) based on GSE45827. Expression correlation of ENTPD1 with ADORA2A (B), ADORA2B (C), ADORA3 (D) in GSE45827.
Correlations of CD39 expression in luminal BC tissues with clinicopathologic features.
| Clinical characteristics | Variable | CD39 expression | Number of cases | χ2 | ||
| High | Low | |||||
| Ethnicity | HISPANIC OR LATINO | 7 (3.98) | 12 (7.02) | 19 (5.48) | 1.55 | 0.2133 |
| NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO | 169 (96.02) | 159 (92.98) | 328 (94.52) | |||
| Age | <60 | 130 (57.52) | 100 (46.95) | 230 (52.39) | 4.92 | |
| ≥60 | 96 (42.48) | 113 (53.05) | 209 (47.61) | |||
| Histological type | Infiltrating ductal carcinoma | 139 (61.50) | 153 (71.83) | 292 (66.51) | 11.86 | |
| Infiltrating lobular carcinoma | 67 (29.65) | 34 (15.96) | 101 (23.01) | |||
| Other | 20 (8.85) | 26 (12.21) | 46 (10.48) | |||
| ER | Negative | 5 (2.21) | 4 (1.88) | 9 (2.05) | Fisher | 1.0000 |
| Positive | 221 (97.79) | 209 (98.12) | 430 (97.95) | |||
| PR | Negative | 26 (11.50) | 38 (17.92) | 64 (14.58) | 3.61 | 0.0573 |
| Positive | 200 (88.50) | 174 (82.08) | 374 (85.19) | |||
| HER2 | Negative | 225 (99.56) | 212 (99.53) | 437 (99.54) | Fisher | 1.0000 |
| Positive | 1 (0.44) | 1 (0.47) | 2 (0.46) | |||
| T classification | T1 | 63 (27.88) | 54 (25.35) | 117 (26.65) | Fisher | 0.8713 |
| T2 | 125 (55.31) | 121 (56.81) | 246 (56.04) | |||
| T3 | 31 (13.72) | 32 (15.02) | 63 (14.35) | |||
| T4 | 7 (3.10) | 5 (2.35) | 12 (2.73) | |||
| TX | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.47) | 1 (0.23) | |||
| M classification | M0 | 195 (86.67) | 179 (84.43) | 374 (85.58) | 0.45 | 0.7982 |
| M1 | 2 (0.89) | 2 (0.94) | 4 (0.92) | |||
| MX | 28 (12.44) | 31 (14.62) | 59 (13.50) | |||
| N classification | N0 | 99 (43.81) | 108 (50.70) | 207 (47.15) | Fisher | |
| N1 | 75 (33.19) | 70 (32.86) | 145 (33.03) | |||
| N2 | 29 (12.83) | 24 (11.27) | 53 (12.07) | |||
| N3 | 22 (9.73) | 7 (3.29) | 29 (6.61) | |||
| NX | 1 (0.44) | 4 (1.88) | 5 (1.14) | |||
| Stage | I | 38 (17.04) | 40 (18.87) | 78 (17.93) | Fisher | 0.8730 |
| II | 124 (55.61) | 123 (58.02) | 247 (56.78) | |||
| III | 57 (25.56) | 46 (21.70) | 103 (23.68 | |||
| IV | 2 (0.90) | 2 (0.94) | 4 (0.92) | |||
| X | 2 (0.90) | 1 (0.47 | 3 (0.69) | |||
| Lymph node status | No | 99 (43.81) | 108 (50.70) | 207 (47.15) | 2.09 | 0.1478 |
| Yes | 127 (56.19) | 105 (49.30) | 232 (52.85) | |||
| Vital status | Alive | 200 (88.50) | 201 (94.37) | 401 (91.34) | 4.78 | |
| Dead | 26 (11.50) | 12 (5.63) | 38 (8.66) | |||
FIGURE 4Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival in luminal breast cancer patients. (A) TCGA cohort. (B) GSE86166 cohort.
Multivariate analysis for luminal molecular type breast cancer patients using Cox regression.
| Variable | HR (95% CI) | |
| CD39 (high vs low) | 2.310 (1.151, 4.637) | 0.0185 |
| N (N0 vs N2-N3-NX) | 0.382 (0.164, 0.893) | 0.0263 |
| N (N1 vs N2-N3-NX) | 0.449 (0.189, 1.071) | 0.0710 |
| Age (≥60 vs <60) | 4.698 (2.295, 9.615) | <0.0001 |
| Histological type (infiltrating ductal carcinoma vs other) | 1.040 (0.391, 2.763) | 0.9376 |
| Histological type (infiltrating lobular carcinoma vs other) | 0.630 (0.203, 1.956) | 0.4239 |
| CD39 (high vs low) | 1.602 (1.009, 2.543) | 0.0458 |
| Stage (2 vs 1) | 0.939 (0.670, 1.316) | 0.7142 |
| Stage (3 vs 1) | 0.954 (0.603, 1.510) | 0.8402 |
| Grade (2 vs 1) | 1.044 (0.660, 1.651) | 0.8532 |
| Grade (3 vs 1) | 0.757 (0.460, 1.247) | 0.2744 |
| Grade (4 vs 1) | 0.226 (0.084, 0.609) | 0.0033 |
Gene sets enriched in CD39 phenotype high.
| MSigDB collection | Gene set name | NES | NOM | FDR |
| C2.cp.v6.2.symbols.gmt | PID_INTEGRIN1_PATHWAY | 2.223 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| KEGG_ECM_RECEPTOR_INTERACTION | 2.229 | <0.001 | 0.003 | |
| PID_AMB2_NEUTROPHILS_PATHWAY | 2.154 | <0.001 | 0.004 | |
| PID_CXCR4_PATHWAY | 2.138 | <0.001 | 0.004 | |
| NABA_CORE_MATRISOME | 2.158 | <0.001 | 0.005 | |
| KEGG_FOCAL_ADHESION | 2.161 | <0.001 | 0.005 | |
| REACTOME_INTEGRIN_CELL_SURFACE_INTERACTIONS | 2.163 | <0.001 | 0.006 | |
| PID_AVB3_INTEGRIN_PATHWAY | 2.170 | <0.001 | 0.007 |
FIGURE 5Enrichment plots from the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA).
FIGURE 6Correlations of CD39 expression with immune infiltration levels in the TCGA cohort. (A) The landscape of immune infiltration in 439 tumor tissues arranged by CD39 expression from low to high. (B) Analysis of differential immune cells between the low and high CD39 expression group in TCGA.