| Literature DB >> 34220895 |
Genki Horiguchi1, Kaori Matsumoto2, Kyosuke Nemoto1, Mayu Inokuchi2,3, Naoki Hirotsu1,2.
Abstract
Hygrophila polysperma is a heterophyllous amphibious plant. The growth of H. polysperma in submerged conditions is challenging due to the low CO2 environment, increased resistance to gas diffusion, and bicarbonate ion (HCO3 -) being the dominant dissolved inorganic carbon source. The submerged leaves of H. polysperma have significantly higher rates of underwater photosynthesis compared with the terrestrial leaves. 4,4'-Diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonate (DIDS), an anion exchanger protein inhibitor, and ethoxyzolamide (EZ), an inhibitor of internal carbonic anhydrase, repressed underwater photosynthesis by the submerged leaves. These results suggested that H. polysperma acclimates to the submerged condition by using HCO3 - for photosynthesis. H. polysperma transports HCO3 - into the leaf by a DIDS-sensitive HCO3 - transporter and converted to CO2 by carbonic anhydrase. Additionally, proteome analysis revealed that submerged leaves accumulated fewer proteins associated with C4 photosynthesis compared with terrestrial leaves. This finding suggested that H. polysperma is capable of C4 and C3 photosynthesis in the terrestrial and submerged leaves, respectively. The ratio of phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase to ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) in the submerged leaves was less than that in the terrestrial leaves. Upon anatomical observation, the terrestrial leaves exhibited a phenotype similar to the Kranz anatomy found among C4 plants; however, chloroplasts in the bundle sheath cells were not located adjacent to the vascular bundles, and the typical Kranz anatomy was absent in submerged leaves. These results suggest that H. polysperma performs proto-Kranz type photosynthesis in a terrestrial environment and shifts from a proto-Kranz type in terrestrial leaves to a HCO3 - use photosynthesis in the submerged environments.Entities:
Keywords: Acanthaceae; amphibious plant; bicarbonate use; carbon concentrating mechanism; proto-Kranz anatomy; submergence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220895 PMCID: PMC8242947 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.675507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Leaf morphology, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and light-response curves of underwater photosynthesis in terrestrial and submerged leaves of Hygrophila polysperma. (A) Heterophyllous leaves of H. polysperma that developed under terrestrial (left) or submerged environments (right). The scale bar is 10 mm. (B) The DIC response curve for underwater photosynthesis per chlorophyll content in the terrestrial and submerged leaves of H. polysperma (n = 3). DIC concentration increased from 10 to 1,650 μM by injected NaHCO3. Measurement light intensity was 285 μmol m–2 s–1, and the pH was 6.3. (C) Light-response curve of underwater photosynthesis per chlorophyll content in the terrestrial and submerged leaves of H. polysperma (n = 3). Photosynthetic photon flux density increased from 0 to 820 μmol photons m–2 s–1 in the presence of 10 mM NaHCO3 at pH 6.3. The results shown in panels (B) and (C) are expressed as means ± SD. Significance was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Hlom–Sidak test (∗p < 0.05).
Leaf morphological characteristics in terrestrial and submerged leaves of Hygrophila polysperma.
| Leaf length (mm) | 28.8 ± 1.5 | 37.1 ± 3.7 | ** |
| Leaf width (mm) | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | ** |
| Length-width ratio | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | ** |
| Leaf area (mm2) | 230.0 ± 10.3 | 271.8 ± 23.7 | * |
| Leaf thickness (μm) | 149.7 ± 21.6 | 89.3 ± 10.2 | * |
| Abaxial stomatal density (no. mm–2) | 92 ± 5 | 26 ± 3 | ** |
| Adaxial stomatal density (no. mm–2) | 32 ± 4 | 24 ± 3 | n.s. |
| Chlorophyll a (mg m–2) | 184.9 ± 10.3 | 68.0 ± 10.1 | ** |
| Chlorophyll b (mg m–2) | 66.2 ± 2.5 | 24.3 ± 2.4 | ** |
| Chl a/b | 2.8 ± 0.05 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | n.s. |
FIGURE 2Photosynthetic HCO3– utilization in the terrestrial and submerged leaves of H. polysperma. (A) Underwater photosynthetic rate (Pn) under different DIC conditions (n = 3). The DIC constituents (CO2 and HCO3–) in the medium at pH 6.3 were present at a ratio of 1:1 and HCO3– only at pH 8.3, respectively. The medium contained 10 mM NaHCO3, 1.5 mM KCl, and 1.0 mM NaCl. (B) The ratio of HCO3– dehydration to CO2 hydration reactions of CA (n = 4). (C) Influence of HCO3– inhibitors on underwater Pn of the submerged leaves (n = 3). Underwater Pn was measured under HCO3– conditions (pH 8.3) in the presence of 0.1 mM AZ, 0.1 mM EZ, 50 mM TRIS, or 0.3 mM DIDS. (A,C) Data were analyzed with Tukey’s HSD test. Different letters indicate statistical differences between the treatments (p < 0.05). (B) Data were analyzed with Student’s t test.
Predicted CAs in H. polysperma from proteome analysis.
| PREDICTED: LOW QUALITY PROTEIN: carbonic anhydrase, chloroplastic-like ( | 1.7 | 0.36 | |
| PREDICTED: carbonic anhydrase, chloroplastic-like isoform X2 ( | 1 | 0.50 | |
| PREDICTED: gamma carbonic anhydrase 2, mitochondrial ( | 1.2 | 0.62 | |
| chloroplast carbonic anhydrase ( | INF | 0.050 | |
| PREDICTED: gamma carbonic anhydrase 1, mitochondrial-like ( | 0.7 | 0.41 | |
| PREDICTED: gamma carbonic anhydrase 3, mitochondrial ( | 1 | 0.61 | |
| Chloroplast beta-carbonic anhydrase ( | 0 | 0.041 |
FIGURE 3Changes in proteome profiles of C4 metabolism and Calvin cycle proteins between terrestrial and submerged leaves of H. polysperma. Red and blue letters and arrows indicate significantly up- and downregulated proteins in the submerged leaves compared with those produced in terrestrial leaves, respectively (Fisher’s extract test, p < 0.05). Purple arrows indicate proteins that were both up- and downregulated. Fold changes in protein content of the submerged leaves compared with the terrestrial leaves are shown in parentheses. (A) Changes in the proteome profile of C4 metabolism. Arrows and broken arrows indicate NADP ME-type and NAD ME-type metabolisms, respectively. (B) The changes in the proteome profile of the Calvin cycle. Metabolites: ALA, alanine; ASP, aspartate; BPGA, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; F-1,6-BP, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; MAL, malate; OAA, oxaloacetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PGA, 3-phosphoglycerate; PYR, pyruvate; R5P, ribose 5-phosphate; RU5P, ribulose 5-phosphate; RUBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; S-1,7-BP, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose 7-phosphate. Enzymes: AlaAT, ALA aminotransferase; ALDO, fructose bisphosphate aldolase; AspAT, ASP aminotransferase; β-CA, beta-carbonic anhydrase; FBP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NAD-MDH, NAD-malate dehydrogenase; NAD-ME, NAD-malic enzyme; NADP-MDH, NADP-malate dehydrogenase; NADP-malic enzyme; PEPC, PEP carboxylase; PEPCK, PEP carboxykinase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; PPDK, PYR orthophosphate dikinase; PPDKRP, PPDK regulatory protein; PRK, phosphoribulokinase; RPI, ribose 5-phosphate isomerase; Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; SPB, sedoheptulose-bisphosphatase; SBPH, sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase; TK, transketolase.
Diurnal change in malate contents in terrestrial and submerged leaves of H. polysperma.
| Malate content (μmol g–1 f.w.) | 2.3 ± 0.3a | 4.2 ± 0.4b | 2.4 ± 0.4a | 3.6 ± 0.3b |
FIGURE 4Carboxylation activities of H. polysperma. (A) PEPC activity. (B) Rubisco activity. (C) The ratio of phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) to Rubisco activity. Data were analyzed with Student’s t test. Results are expressed as means (n = 5) ± SD. m, mesophyll cell; ue, upper epidermis; le, lower epidermis; bs, bundle sheath cell; a, air space. The arrowhead indicates the chloroplast.
FIGURE 5Light photomicrographs of leaf cross sections of the terrestrial (A) and submerged (B) leaves of H. polysperma. Scale bars = 100 μm. m, mesophyll cell; ue, upper epidermis; le, lower epidermis; bs, bundle sheath cell; a, air space. The arrowhead indicates the chloroplast.
FIGURE 6Anatomical measurements of H. polysperma leaves that developed under terrestrial and submerged conditions. Cell sizes of mesophyll cells (A); bundle sheath cells (B); epidermal cells (C) and the size ratio of mesophyll cells (MCs) to Rubisco in bundle sheath cells (BSCs) (D). (A–C) Cell sizes were measured for all cells in the profile area (W370 μm) from three independent biological replicates. Boxes indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, with medians indicated by the horizontal line in the box. The open circles in the boxes show the raw data. (D) The ratio of MC to BSC size was calculated from averages of MC and BSC sizes in each sample. The data were analyzed with Student’s t test, and the results are expressed as means ± SD.