| Literature DB >> 34220655 |
Mareike Schrader1, Stephan Bamborschke1, Ute Lenk1, Annette Sterr1,2.
Abstract
About 85% of survivors of acute Wernicke's Encephalopathy (WE), a frequent and serious consequence of thiamine deficiency and alcohol misuse, sustain chronic neurocognitive deficits also known as chronic Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS). If alcoholism is combined with smoking, tobacco alcohol optic neuropathy (TAON) may occur which leads to visual impairment. In contrast to WKS, TAON may be treated successfully by early vitamin substitution and detoxification. Little research has been conducted on WKS longterm outcomes. Existing literature suggests poor prognosis. Symptoms remaining beyond the acute treatment with thiamine are thought to be irreversible. Whether neurorehabilitation may be an effective route to help recovery of those persistent symptoms is an open question. At our neurorehabilitation center, which specializes in the treatment of severe chronic deficits after brain injury, the opportunity arose to treat a 35 year old male with WKS, and to conduct follow-up assessments 3- and 7-years post discharge, respectively. Initially MK was admitted to emergency care with suspected postconcussive syndrome, alcohol-related thiamine deficiency, and TAON. Thiamin, cobalamin, and folate substituion improved TAON but major cognitive deficits remained. When admitted to our center 4 months later, he was fully reliant on care staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Through intensive neurocognive training and psychological treatment he improved gradually and, after 26 months, was well enough to be discharged into the community and pursue work in a sheltered setting. Neuropsychological tests, as well as patient reports obtained at the follow-ups showed that the benefits apparent at discharge had been sustained, and for some scores, improved further. This was particularly evident in the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test which improved from percentage ranges <1 for immediate recognition and recall at discharge to rank 16 for immediate recognition and rank 5 for recall at the 7-year follow-up. This case study illustrates the immense benefits neurorehabilitation can have for WKS induced by alcohol misuse. It further demonstrates how skills and strategies, learned in the inpatient setting, translate into living well and independently, and how the latter promotes further improvement long after discharge.Entities:
Keywords: Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome; case study; cognitive deficit; societal participation; tobacco alcohol optic neuropathy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220655 PMCID: PMC8242940 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Timeline of events illustrates the journey of his incident to 7-year follow-up.
Summary of the neuropsychological tests conducted at P.A.N. admission (2010), P.A.N. discharge (2012), 3- (2015), and 7-year follow-up (2019) in the community.
| Amnesia score | −12; PR = 0 | −1.5; PR = 7 | ||
| Verbal score | n/a | n/a | −7; PR = 0 | −3; PR = 0 |
| Figural score | −9.4; PR = 0 | 1.5; PR = 93 | ||
| Amnestic syndrom | −12.9; PR = 0 | −1.2; PR = 12 | ||
| 31s/74s | –/98s | – | 28s/94s | |
| Immediate | n/a | 11.5; PR = 1 | 11; PR = 1 | 16.5; PR = 16 |
| Recall/delayed recall | 4; PR <1 | 8; PR <1 | 14.5; PR = 5 | |
| Alertness (key value; PR) | −0.022; PR = 21 | 0.011; PR = 34 | −0.046; PR = 16 | |
| - uncued (s; PR) | 315s; PR = 4 | 274s; PR = 12 | 238s; PR = 34 | |
| - cued (s; PR) | 322s; PR = 5 | 271s; PR = 12 | 249s; PR = 21 | |
| Working memories (no.; PR) | _ | |||
| - Omissions | n/a | 0; PR = 88 | 0; PR = 92 | |
| - Errors | n/a | 5; PR = 14 | 3; PR = 38 | |
| Divided Attention (no.; PR) | ||||
| - Omissions | 4; PR = 8 | 0; PR = 79 | 0; PR = 82 | |
| - Errors | 4; PR = 8 | 0; PR = 76 | 0; PR = 79 | |
| Go-Nogo (no.; PR) | ||||
| - Errors | 1; PR = 38 | 0; PR > 42 | 0; PR > 42 | |
| - Med response time (s; PR) | 668s; PR = 2 | 508s; PR = 62 | 491s; PR = 79 | |
| - Encoding | 6; PR = 30–45 | 9; PR = 85 | 8; PR = 75–80 | |
| - Learning | 29; PR ≤ 5 | _ | 41; PR = 10 | 41; PR = 10 |
| - Consolidation | 5; PR ≤ 5 | 6; PR ≤ 5 | 0; PR = 70–85 | |
| - Free recall | 0; PR ≤ 5 | 2; PR ≤ 5 | 9; PR = 15–20 | |
| - Recognition | 0; PR ≤ 5 | 1; PR ≤ 5 | 8; PR = 15–20 |
n/a, patient lacks cognitive ability to perform the test; PR, percentil rank; s, seconds.
Figure 2Illustration of the P.A.N. rehabilitation concept. Hallmark of this concept is a holistic approach with interdisciplinary support of rehabilitation, where all therapeutic intentions are tied into 24/7 program of learning to live independently. Patients live in groups of 14 in a home-like setting. Within these groups level of support is titrated to individual needs and hence allows for “round the clock” practice and the continous adjustment of goals. Going through neurorehabilitation while living in groups further supports communication and practice of social skills.
Categorical classification of percentile rank (PR) values according to the German Guidelines (www.neuropsy.ch; category descriptors translated by the authors).
| >98–100 | Very superior |
| ≥95– ≤ 98 | Superior |
| ≥84– <95 | High average |
| ≥16– ≤ 84 | Average |
| >5– <16 | Below average |
| ≥2– ≤ 5 | Very low |
| 0– <2 | Extremely low |
Figure 3Performance on Rey figure.