Erin E Rees1, Rachel Rodin2, Nicholas H Ogden1. 1. Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, St. Hyacinthe, QC and Guelph, ON. 2. Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To maintain control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic as lockdowns are lifted, it will be crucial to enhance alternative public health measures. For surveillance, it will be necessary to detect a high proportion of any new cases quickly so that they can be isolated, and people who have been exposed to them traced and quarantined. Here we introduce a mathematical approach that can be used to determine how many samples need to be collected per unit area and unit time to detect new clusters of COVID-19 cases at a stage early enough to control an outbreak. METHODS: We present a sample size determination method that uses a relative weighted approach. Given the contribution of COVID-19 test results from sub-populations to detect the disease at a threshold prevalence level to control the outbreak to 1) determine if the expected number of weekly samples provided from current healthcare-based surveillance for respiratory virus infections may provide a sample size that is already adequate to detect new clusters of COVID-19 and, if not, 2) to determine how many additional weekly samples were needed from volunteer sampling. RESULTS: In a demonstration of our method at the weekly and Canadian provincial and territorial (P/T) levels, we found that only the more populous P/T have sufficient testing numbers from healthcare visits for respiratory illness to detect COVID-19 at our target prevalence level-assumed to be high enough to identify and control new clusters. Furthermore, detection of COVID-19 is most efficient (fewer samples required) when surveillance focuses on healthcare symptomatic testing demand. In the volunteer populations: the higher the contact rates; the higher the expected prevalence level; and the fewer the samples were needed to detect COVID-19 at a predetermined threshold level. CONCLUSION: This study introduces a targeted surveillance strategy, combining both passive and active surveillance samples, to determine how many samples to collect per unit area and unit time to detect new clusters of COVID-19 cases. The goal of this strategy is to allow for early enough detection to control an outbreak.
BACKGROUND: To maintain control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic as lockdowns are lifted, it will be crucial to enhance alternative public health measures. For surveillance, it will be necessary to detect a high proportion of any new cases quickly so that they can be isolated, and people who have been exposed to them traced and quarantined. Here we introduce a mathematical approach that can be used to determine how many samples need to be collected per unit area and unit time to detect new clusters of COVID-19 cases at a stage early enough to control an outbreak. METHODS: We present a sample size determination method that uses a relative weighted approach. Given the contribution of COVID-19 test results from sub-populations to detect the disease at a threshold prevalence level to control the outbreak to 1) determine if the expected number of weekly samples provided from current healthcare-based surveillance for respiratory virus infections may provide a sample size that is already adequate to detect new clusters of COVID-19 and, if not, 2) to determine how many additional weekly samples were needed from volunteer sampling. RESULTS: In a demonstration of our method at the weekly and Canadian provincial and territorial (P/T) levels, we found that only the more populous P/T have sufficient testing numbers from healthcare visits for respiratory illness to detect COVID-19 at our target prevalence level-assumed to be high enough to identify and control new clusters. Furthermore, detection of COVID-19 is most efficient (fewer samples required) when surveillance focuses on healthcare symptomatic testing demand. In the volunteer populations: the higher the contact rates; the higher the expected prevalence level; and the fewer the samples were needed to detect COVID-19 at a predetermined threshold level. CONCLUSION: This study introduces a targeted surveillance strategy, combining both passive and active surveillance samples, to determine how many samples to collect per unit area and unit time to detect new clusters of COVID-19 cases. The goal of this strategy is to allow for early enough detection to control an outbreak.
Authors: Xintong Li; Howard H Chang; Qu Cheng; Philip A Collender; Ting Li; Jinge He; Lance A Waller; Benjamin A Lopman; Justin V Remais Journal: Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol Date: 2020-06-10
Authors: Nick H Ogden; Aamir Fazil; Julien Arino; Philippe Berthiaume; David N Fisman; Amy L Greer; Antoinette Ludwig; Victoria Ng; Ashleigh R Tuite; Patricia Turgeon; Lisa A Waddell; Jianhong Wu Journal: Can Commun Dis Rep Date: 2020-06-04
Authors: Victoria Ng; Aamir Fazil; Lisa A Waddell; Christina Bancej; Patricia Turgeon; Ainsley Otten; Nicole Atchessi; Nicholas H Ogden Journal: CMAJ Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Allison L Hicks; Stephen M Kissler; Tatum D Mortimer; Kevin C Ma; George Taiaroa; Melinda Ashcroft; Deborah A Williamson; Marc Lipsitch; Yonatan H Grad Journal: Elife Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 8.140