| Literature DB >> 34220290 |
He Huang1, Po-Chou Shih2, Yuelan Zhu3, Wei Gao3.
Abstract
In the era of artificial intelligence, the healthcare industry is undergoing tremendous innovation and development based on sophisticated AI algorithms. Focusing on diagnosis process and target disease, this study theoretically proposed an integrated model to optimize traditional medical expense system, and ultimately helps medical staff and patients make more reliable decisions. From the new perspective of total expense estimation and detailed expense analysis, the proposed model innovatively consists of two intelligent modules, with theoretical contribution. The two modules are SVM-based module and SOM-based module. According to the rigorous comparative analysis with two classic AI techniques, back propagation neural networks and random forests, it is demonstrated that the SVM-based module achieved better capability of total expense estimation. Meanwhile, by designing a two-stage clustering process, SOM-based module effectively generated decision clusters and corresponding cluster centers were obtained, that clarified the complex relationship between detailed expense and patient information. To achieve practical contribution, the proposed model was applied to the diagnosis process of coronary heart disease. The real data from a hospital in Shanghai was collected, and the validity and accuracy of the proposed model were verified with rigorous experiments. The proposed model innovatively optimized traditional medical expense system, and intelligently generated reliable decision-making information for both total expense and detailed expense. The successful application on the target disease further indicates that this model is a user-friendly tool for medical expense control and therapeutic regimen strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence algorithm; Disease diagnosis; Health care management; Medical expense; System optimization
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220290 PMCID: PMC8235905 DOI: 10.1007/s10878-021-00761-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comb Optim ISSN: 1382-6905 Impact factor: 1.262
Fig. 1The schematic of the proposed model
Fig. 2The core concept of SVM regression
Fig. 3The basic concept of SOM
The descriptive statistics analysis for five numerical variables (before normalization)
| Numerical variable | Maximum | Minimum | Mean | Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total expense | 99,958.00 | 20,663.26 | 57,441.51 | 53,927.69 |
| Age | 98.00 | 60.00 | 72.07 | 70.00 |
| Hospital length of stay (HLOS) | 35.00 | 1.00 | 6.38 | 5.00 |
| Quantity of surgical equipment (QOSE) | 4.00 | 1.00 | 1.38 | 1.00 |
| Level of surgical equipment (LOSE) | 81,672.00 | 4763.00 | 21,953.18 | 17,200.00 |
The unit of Total Expense is CNY, the unit of Age is year, the unit of HLOS is day, the unit of QOSE is number, the unit of LOSE is CNY
The Pearson correlation test results
| Age | HLOS | QOSE | LOSE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.0000 | 0.2221 | − 0.0910 | 0.2588 |
| HLOS | 0.2221 | 1.0000 | 0.0032 | 0.0522 |
| QOSE | − 0.0910 | 0.0032 | 1.0000 | − 0.2753 |
| LOSE | 0.2588 | 0.0522 | − 0.2753 | 1.0000 |
The key parameters for SVM-based module
| Key parameter | Value or type |
|---|---|
| The set type of SVM | nu-SVR |
| The set type of kernel function | Radial basis function |
| The optimal objective value of the dual SVM problem | − 123.480819 |
| The bias term in the decision function | − 0.378418 |
| The number of support vectors and bounded support vectors | 827 and 773 |
| The number of iterations | 2136 |
Estimation performance evaluation
| SVM-based module | BPNN | RF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RMSE (normalization) | 0.0459 | 0.0583 | 0.0665 |
| RMSE (inverse-normalization) | 3636.9459 | 4624.8852 | 5273.7238 |
The key parameters for BPNN and RF
| Input neurons | 20 | Output Neurons | 1 |
| Hidden layers | 1 | Optimizer | adam |
| Hidden neurons | 4 | Learning Rate | 0.001 |
| Loss function | mse | Validation Split | 0.1 |
| Dropout (hidden layer) | 0.1 | Batch Size | 50 |
| Activation function (hidden layer) | relu | Epochs | 10,000 |
| Activation function (output layer) | Sigmoid | ||
| The number of mtry | 6 | The number of trees | 500 |
The key parameters for SOM-based module
| Parameter | Value | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Input neurons | 1 | 5 |
| Output neurons | 1 × 5 | 1 × 4 |
| Neighborhood | 3 | 1 |
| Learning rate | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Neighborhood reduction | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Learning rate reduction | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| The minimum of learning rate | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Epochs | 10 | 10 |
Results of SOM-based module (cluster centers)
| No. of secondary cluster | Material fee | Hospitalization fee | Treatment fee | Examination fee | Assay fee | Medicine fee | Quantity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Cluster 1 | 1 | 38,956.53 | 2603.83 | 3250.88 | 3304.82 | 5022.54 | 3821.26 | 104 |
| 2 | 38,956.53 | 1383.94 | 2570.47 | 2310.50 | 3807.64 | 1936.20 | 231 | |
| 3 | 38,956.53 | 482.91 | 2097.20 | 2269.58 | 3181.67 | 1460.71 | 344 | |
| 4 | 38,956.53 | 292.43 | 2035.66 | 1888.72 | 2540.70 | 1248.91 | 482 | |
Primary Cluster 2 | 5 | 43,161.78 | 312.00 | 2422.68 | 1822.30 | 2770.95 | 1414.54 | 85 |
| 6 | 43,161.78 | 446.78 | 2533.37 | 2482.32 | 3277.37 | 1666.83 | 64 | |
| 7 | 43,161.78 | 1234.89 | 3119.01 | 3146.73 | 4114.24 | 2919.23 | 33 | |
| 8 | 43,161.78 | 2926.62 | 4289.77 | 3419.75 | 5878.81 | 7027.49 | 16 | |
Primary Cluster 3 | 9 | 49,801.43 | 364.10 | 2296.77 | 2423.92 | 2804.00 | 1496.26 | 81 |
| 10 | 49,801.43 | 455.98 | 2381.40 | 1676.46 | 2541.17 | 1461.64 | 90 | |
| 11 | 49,801.43 | 864.65 | 2753.62 | 2073.04 | 3533.24 | 2254.55 | 74 | |
| 12 | 49,801.43 | 1836.33 | 3343.02 | 2890.19 | 5005.73 | 5798.79 | 23 | |
Primary Cluster 4 | 13 | 57,919.54 | 1875.86 | 3259.96 | 4729.38 | 5242.10 | 4509.80 | 21 |
| 14 | 57,919.54 | 947.52 | 2735.70 | 3032.20 | 3738.90 | 2291.22 | 60 | |
| 15 | 57,919.54 | 502.66 | 2384.71 | 2233.47 | 3145.12 | 1530.20 | 66 | |
| 16 | 57,919.54 | 401.34 | 2384.73 | 1730.60 | 2346.31 | 1597.02 | 130 | |
Primary Cluster 5 | 17 | 65,875.12 | 3629.18 | 7034.76 | 5532.20 | 7155.37 | 12,286.37 | 34 |
| 18 | 65,875.12 | 1803.93 | 4417.25 | 3229.24 | 4547.50 | 3877.01 | 123 | |
| 19 | 65,875.12 | 941.47 | 3401.73 | 2340.72 | 3351.80 | 1980.45 | 158 | |
| 20 | 65,875.12 | 632.68 | 2605.05 | 2064.43 | 2774.09 | 1235.52 | 404 |