| Literature DB >> 34220252 |
Haider Karar1, Muhammad Amjad Bashir2, Muneeba Haider3, Najeeba Haider3, Muhammad Hassan4, Mohamed Hashem5,6, Saad Alamri5.
Abstract
The experiment was conducted at Cotton Research Station, Multan to study the impact of weather factors and Hemipterous bug on development of cotton boll disease in cotton variety bt- 886 for three consecutive years i.e., 2012, 2013 and 2014. The results revealed that the population of Red Cotton Bug (RCB) per plant remain 0.50 and 0.34 during years 2012 and 2013, respectively but increased during 2014 i.e., 3.21 per plant. The number of unopened bolls (UOB) were more during 2012 i.e., 13.43% with yellowish lint (YL) 76.30% and whitish lint (WL) 23.70% at average maximum temperature of 34.73◦C, minimum temperature of 22.83◦C, RH of 77.43% and 11.08 mm rainfall. Similarly during 2013, the number of unopened bolls were less i.e., 0.34 per plant with YL 1.48 and WL 99.53 per plant when average maximum temperature 34.60◦C, minimum temperature 23.37◦C, RH 73.01% and 9.95 mm rainfall. During 2014, RCB population per plant was 3.22 with no UOB and YL was 0.00% and WL was 100% when average maximum temperature 23.70◦C, minimum temperature 23.18◦C, RH 71.67% and 4.55 mm rainfall. So our results concluded that the cotton bolls rot disease was more during 2012 due to abrupt changes in environmental factors. The RCB may be the carrier of boll rot disease pathogen during more rainfall.Entities:
Keywords: Cotton variety bt-886; Hemipterous bug; Weather factors; Whitish lint; Yellowish lint
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220252 PMCID: PMC8241606 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Av RCB per plant and abiotic week wise factors during 2012.
Fig. 2Av RCB per plant and abiotic week wise factors during 2013.
Fig. 3Av RCB per plant and abiotic week wise factors during 2014.
Fig. 4Av RCB per plant and abiotic week wise factors average of 2012,13 and 14.
Fig. 5Month wise average pop of RCB per plant and weather factors 2012.
Fig. 6Month wise average pop of RCB per plant and weather factors 2013.
Fig. 7Month wise average pop of RCB per plant and weather factors 2014.
Fig. 8Year wise comparison of RCB pop/plant, UOB, YL, WL with abiotic factors.
Simple correlation between the population of Red Cotton bug and weather factor during the study years 2012, 2013 and 2014.
| Years | r- values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weather Factors | ||||
| Temperature | R.H. (%) | Rainfall (mm) | ||
| Max oC | Mini oC | |||
| 2012 | −0.81 (0.00) | −0.79 (0.00) | 0.43 (0.05) | −0.13 (0.57) |
| 2013 | −0.79 (0.00) | −0.88 (0.00) | 0.40 (0.08) | −0.26 (0.27) |
| 2014 | −0.19 (0.43) | −0.18 (0.46) | −0.13 (0.49) | −0.14 (0.57) |
| Cumulative | −0.35 (0.13) | −0.35 (0.14) | 0.32 (0.18) | −0.24 (0.30) |
Multiple linear regression models between population of red cotton bugand weather factors.
| Years | Regression Equation | D.F. | F-value | P- value | 100 R2 | Impact (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.83–0.0539 X1 | 18 | 34.11 | 0.00 | 65.5 | 65.5 | |
| 2.52–0.0358 X1 − 0.0142 X2 | 17 | 16.92 | 0.00 | 66.6 | 1.1 | |
| 4.15–0.0698 X1 + 0.0014 X2 − 0.0103 X3 | 16 | 12.25 | 0.00 | 69.7 | 3.1 | |
| 4.18–0.0686 X1- 0.0002 X2 − 0.0109 X3 + 0.00032 X4 | 15 | 8.63 | 0.001 | 69.7 | 0 | |
| 3.58–0.0934 X1 | 18 | 29.46 | 0.00 | 62.1 | 62.1 | |
| Y = | 1.16 + 0.0454 X1 − 0.102 X2 | 17 | 31.20 | 0.00 | 78.6 | 16.5 |
| 2.87 + 0.0208 X1 − 0.0987 X2 | 16 | 23.92 | 0.00 | 81.8 | 3.2 | |
| Y = | 2.86 + 0.0208 X1 − 0.0986 X2 − 0.0127 X3- 0.00005 X4 | 15 | 16.82 | 0.00 | 81.8 | 0 |
| nsY = | 3.65–0.0672 X1 | 18 | 0.66 | 0.427 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| nsY = | 3.52–0.061 X1 − 0.003 X2 | 17 | 0.31 | 0.735 | 3.5 | 0 |
| nsY = | 1.64–0.043 X1 − 0.004 X2 + 0.0176 X3 | 16 | 0.23 | 0.872 | 4.2 | 0.7 |
| nsY = | 1.75–0.040 X1 − 0.003 X2 + 0.0148 X3- 0.0079 X4 | 15 | 0.19 | 0.941 | 4.8 | 0.6 |
| nsY = | 2.91–0.0475 X1 | 18 | 2.49 | 0.132 | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| nsY = | 2.62–0.033 X1 − 0.0092 X2 | 17 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 12.2 | 0.00 |
| nsY = | 0.04 + 0.026 X1- 0.0343 X2 + 0.0149 X3 | 16 | 0.86 | 0.482 | 13.9 | 1.7 |
| nsY= | − 2.10 + 0.052 X1 − 0.0278 X2 + 0.0313 X3 − 0.0119 X4 | 15 | 0.86 | 0.498 | 19.0 | 5.1 |
Where X1 = Max. Temperature X2 = Mini. Temperature X3 = R.H percent X4 = Rainfall
R2 = Coefficient of Determination
* = Significant at P ≤ 0.05.
Significant at P ≤ 0.01.