| Literature DB >> 34220221 |
Iqra Farooq1, Z A Qadri1, Z A Rather1, Imtiyaz T Nazki1, Neelofar Banday1, Sadaf Rafiq1, Khalid Z Masoodi2, Ahmed Noureldeen3, Sheikh Mansoor4.
Abstract
An efficient protocol for in-vitro propagation of an important ornamental crop, Petunia hybrida Vilm. Cv. "Bravo" was developed. The explants that were used to carry out the experiment were Leaf segments, nodal segments and shoot tips. Nodal segments recorded highest per cent asepsis followed by shoot tips and leaf segments. Asepsis was found to be highest when the explants were sterilized with Fungicide (Carbendazim) 0.02% for the duration of 30 min followed by 0.1% HgCl2 for duration of 10 min and then ethanol 70% for 10 s. Longer duration of the sterilant treatment showed more necrotic effects on the explants, thus mercuric chloride treatment when given for 5 min proved to be more effective in terms of survival of the explants. Maximum establishment per cent was recorded in Murashige and Skoog (MS) media fortified with BAP (1.5 mg L-1) and IBA (0.5 mg L-1) in shoot tips and nodal segments, i.e. 97.90 and 95.74% respectively. Callus was efficiently induced and developed when PGR amalgamation of BAP (0.1 mg L-1) and 2,4-D (1.5mg L-1) was used. Kinetin at the concentration of 2.0 mg L-1 along with IBA at 0.5mg L-1 recorded highest callus regeneration in both leaf and internodal segment derived callus. Maximum proliferation percent of shoots (97.90%), highest number of shoots (20.50 explant-1) and maximum length of shoot (2.70 cm) was recorded in PGR combination of IBA and BAP both at 0.5 mg L-1 concentration level. Rhizogenesis was recorded to be highest in the MS media containing IBA 1.00 mg L-1. Best hardening media which recorded maximum survival per cent 92.50% was noticed on the media formulation comprised of equal ratio of perlite and vermiculite mix, under poly house conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Callus; In vitro; Micropropagation; Organogenesis; Petunia hybrida; Proliferation; Tissue culture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220221 PMCID: PMC8241620 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Petunia cultivar (“Bravo”) selected for the investigation.
Influence of sterilant treatments and time duration on asceptic culture and survival of explants of Petunia hybrida Vilm. cv. “Bravo” Figures in the parentheses are the statistically transformed (arc sign and square root) values of percentage data.
| Sterilant Treatments | Explant | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoot Tip | Nodal Segment | Leaf | |||||||||||
| Asepsis % | Survival % | Asepsis % | Survival % | Asepsis % | Survival % | ||||||||
| 2 weeks (T1) | 4 weeks (T2) | 2 weeks (T1) | 4 weeks (T2) | 2 weeks (T1) | 4 weeks (T2) | 2 weeks (T1) | 4 weeks (T2) | 2 weeks (T1) | 4 weeks (T2) | 2 weeks (T1) | 4 weeks (T2) | ||
| S1 | HgCl2 0.1% for 5 min | 45.83 (42.58) | 33.33 (35.16) | 54.16 (47.37) | 41.66 (40.14) | 47.91 (6.97) | 43.78 (6.66) | 54.16 (47.37) | 43.74 (41.34) | 56.24 (7.55) | 45.83 (6.83) | 49.99 (44.97) | 39.58 (38.91) |
| S2 | HgCl2 0.1% for 10 min | 85.41 (67.70) | 77.08 (61.45) | 47.91 (43.78) | 39.58 (38.91) | 83.33 (9.12) | 77.08 (8.27) | 52.08 (46.17) | 41.66 (40.14) | 81.24 (9.06) | 77.08 (8.83) | 45.83 (42.58) | 35.41 (36.48) |
| S3 | HgCl2 0.1% for 5 min + ethyl alcohol 70% for 10 s | 47.91 (43.78) | 41.66 (40.14) | 79.16 (63.43) | 64.58 (53.59) | 54.16 (7.42) | 45.83 (6.83) | 74.99 (60.29) | 64.58 (53.55) | 62.58 (7.95) | 49.99 (7.12) | 72.91 (58.81) | 62.58 (52.40) |
| S4 | Carbendezim 0.01% for 30 min + S3 | 49.99 (44.98) | 41.66 (40.14) | 91.66 (75.40) | 83.33 (66.22) | 60.41 (7.82) | 47.91 (6.97) | 93.74 (77.23) | 85.41 (67.70) | 64.58 (8.08) | 56.24 (7.56) | 89.57 (71.35) | 79.16 (62.92) |
| S5 | Carbendezim 0.02% for 30 min + S3 | 54.16 (47.37) | 47.91 (43.78) | 62.49 (7.96) | 50.08 (7.13) | 68.74 (8.34) | 62.57 (7.96) | ||||||
| S6 | Carbendezim 0.01% for 30 min + HgCl2 0.1% for 10 min + ethyl alcohol 70% for 10 s | 89.57 (73.62) | 85.41 (67.70) | 41.66 (40.15) | 33.33 (35.16) | 87.49 (9.39) | 79.16 (8.95) | 43.74 (41.34) | 37.49 (37.60) | 37.49 (37.71) | 29.16 (32.61) | ||
| S7 | Carbendezim 0.02% for 30 min + HgCl2 0.1% for 10 min + ethyl alcohol 70% for 10 s | 39.57 (38.94) | 31.24 (33.93) | 41.91 (40.91) | 31.24 (33.85) | 91.66 (9.62) | 87.49 (9.40) | 35.41 (36.48) | 29.16 (32.61) | ||||
| C.D(P≤0.05) | Time (T) | ||||||||||||
| Sterilant (S) | |||||||||||||
| TxS | |||||||||||||
Influence of growth regulator combinations on per cent culture establishment in Petunia hybrida Vilm. cv. “Bravo”.
| Treatments (MS + PGRS) | Shoot tips | Nodal segments |
|---|---|---|
| IBA (0.1 mg L−1) + BAP (0.5 mg L−1) | 45.83 (6.83) | 31.24 (5.66) |
| IBA (0.1 mg L1) + BAP (1.0 mg L−1) | 52.08 (7.28) | 43.74 (6.66) |
| IBA (0.1 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1) | 70.83 (8.47) | 64.58 (8.08) |
| IBA (0.2 mg L−1) + BAP (0.5 mg L−1) | 43.74 (6.66) | 37.49 (6.19) |
| IBA (0.2 mg L−−1) + BAP (1.0 mg L−1) | 62.49 (7.96) | 58.33 (7.69) |
| IBA (0.2 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1) | 81.24 (9.06) | 72.91 (8.58) |
| IBA (0.3 mg L−1) + BAP (0.5 mg L−1) | 77.08 (8.83) | 77.08 (8.83) |
| IBA (0.3 mg L−1) + BAP (1.0 mg L−1) | 85.41 (9.29) | 79.16 (8.95) |
| IBA (0.3 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1) | 87.49 (9.40) | 83.33 (9.18) |
| IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + BAP (0.5 mg L−1) | 83.33 (9.17) | 79.16 (8.95) |
| IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + BAP (1.0 mg L−1) | 91.66 (9.62) | 87.49 (9.40) |
| IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1) | ||
Figures in the parentheses are square root transformed values of percentage data.
Fig. 2Culture Establishment; (a): IBA + BAP: 0.5 + 1.5 mg L−1, (b): IBA + BAP: 0.5 + 1.0 mg L−1.
Influence of growth regulators on callusing in leaf and internodal segment explants.
| Treatments (MS + PGRS) | Leaf | Internodal Segment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callus type | Callus type | |||||
| BAP (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1) | 77.08 (8.82) | 1.39 | Compact, yellowish green | 60.41 (7.82) | 1.47 | Loose, creamy green |
| BAP (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (1.0 mg L−1) | 72.91 (8.59) | 1.28 | Compact, yellowish green | 54.16 (7.42) | 1.31 | Loose, creamy green |
| BAP (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (1.5 mg L−1) | 56.24 (7.56) | 0.90 | Compact, green | 41.66 (6.51) | 1.11 | Loose, creamy green |
| BAP (0.5 mg L−1) + 2,4-D (0.5 mg L−1) | 68.74 (8.34) | 0.98 | Compact, creamish green | 45.83 (6.83) | 1.04 | Compact, creamy green |
| BAP (0.5 mg L−1) + 2,4-D (1.0 mg L−1) | 74.99 (8.71) | 1.32 | Compact, creamish green | 64.57 (8.09) | 1.36 | Compact, creamy green |
| BAP (0.5 mg L−1) + 2,4-D (1.5 mg L−1) | 79.16 (8.95) | 1.44 | Loose, creamish green | 66.66 (8.21) | 1.54 | Compact, creamy green |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1) | 83.33 (9.17) | 1.58 | Compact, yellowish green | 72.91 (8.59) | 1.75 | Compact, green |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + NAA (1.0 mg L−1) | 85.41 (9.29) | 1.78 | Compact, green | 77.08 (8.83) | 1.82 | Compact, green |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + NAA (1.5 mg L−1) | 81.24 (9.06) | 1.50 | Compact, green | 68.74 (8.34) | 1.67 | Compact, green |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + 2,4-D (0.5 mg L−1) | 83.33 (9.17) | 1.56 | Compact, creamish green | 74.99 (8.71) | 1.73 | Compact, creamy green |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + 2,4-D (1.0 mg L−1) | 91.66 (9.62) | 1.88 | Compact, brownish green | 87.49 (9.40) | 2.05 | Compact, creamy green |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + 2,4-D (1.5 mg L−1) | 95.82 (9.83) | 1.90 | Loose, brownish green | 91.66 (9.62) | 2.11 | Compact, green |
Figures in the parentheses are square root transformed value of the percentage data.
Data recorded after 4 weeks of culture.
Callus weight recorded after 6 weeks of culture.
Fig. 3Callusing, (a): Callusing from leaf explants in MS media, BAP + 2,4-D : 1.0 + 1.5 mg L−1; (b): Callusing from leaf explants in MS media, BAP + 2,4-D : 1.0 + 1.0 mg L−1; (c): Callusing from internodal segment explants in MS media, BAP + 2,4-D : 1.0 + 1.5 mg L−1; (d): Callusing from internodal segment explants in MS media, BAP + 2,4-D : 1.0 + 1.0 mg L−1.
Influence of growth regulator combinations on shoot regeneration in leaf and internodal segment derived callus.
| Treatments (MS + PGRS) | Leaf Derived Callus | Internodal Segment Derived Callus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regeneration (%) | Shoot number callus−1 | Regeneration (%) | Shoot number callus−1 | |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) | 4.16 (2.02) | 1.25 | 2.08 (1.51) | 1.75 |
| BAP (1.0 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1) | 18.74 (4.33) | 7.50 | 16.66 (4.14) | 5.50 |
| Kinetin (1.0 mg L−1) + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) | 6.24 (2.54) | 2.50 | 4.16 (2.02) | 2.50 |
| Kinetin (1.0 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1) | 22.91 (4.84) | 9.00 | 20.83 (4.65) | 8.75 |
| BAP (2.0 mg L−1) + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) | 8.33 (2.82) | 5.75 | 8.33 (2.82) | 4.00 |
| BAP (2.0 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1) | 27.08 (5.25) | 10.50 | 27.08 (5.25) | 12.00 |
| Kinetin (2.0 mg L−1) + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) | 14.58 (3.85) | 6.00 | 12.49 (3.62) | 6.25 |
| Kinetin (2.0 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1) | 35.41 (6.02) | 13.00 | 29.16 (5.47) | 14.50 |
Data recorded after 8 weeks of culture.
Figures in the parentheses are square root transformed value of the percentage data.
Fig. 4Shoot regeneration, Kinetin + NAA: 2.0 + 0.5 mg L−1; (a): Shoot regeneration from leaf derived callus; (b): shoot regeneration from internodal segment derived callus.
Influence of growth regulator combinations on shoot proliferation from microshoots of Petunia hybrida Vilm cv. “Bravo”.
| Treatments (MS + PGRS) | Shoot proliferation (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BAP (0.50 mg L−1) + IBA (0.10 mg L−1) | 70.83 (8.47) | 8.25 | 1.52 |
| BAP (0.50 mg L−1) + IBA (0.25 mg L−1) | 91.66 (9.62) | 21.50 | 2.53 |
| BAP (0.50 mg L−1) + IBA (0.50 mg L−1) | 97.90 (9.94) | 22.25 | 2.70 |
| BAP (1.00 mg L−1) + IBA (0.10 mg L−1) | 72.91 (8.59) | 9.50 | 1.95 |
| BAP (1.00 mg L−1) + IBA (0.25 mg L−1) | 77.08 (8.82) | 18.00 | 1.87 |
| BAP (1.00 mg L−1) + IBA (0.50 mg L−1) | 81.24 (9.06) | 17.50 | 2.47 |
Figures in the parentheses are square root transformed values of percentage data.
Data recorded after 6 weeks of culture.
Fig. 5Shoot proliferation of microshoots of Petunia hybrida; (a): BAP (1.00 mg L−1) + IBA (0.50 mg L−1); (b): BAP (0.50 mg L−1) + IBA (0.25 mg L−1); (c): BAP (0.50 mg L−1) + IBA (0.50 mg L−1).
Influence of auxins on Rhizogenesis in Petunia hybrida.Vilm cv. “Bravo”.
| Treatments (MS + PGRS) | Rooting (%) | Root number shoot−1 |
|---|---|---|
| IBA (0.25 mg L−1) | 35.41 (36.40) | 2.25 |
| IBA (0.50 mg L−1) | 52.08 (46.17) | 4.75 |
| IBA (0.75 mg L−1) | 89.57 (71.35) | 7.75 |
| IBA (1.00 mg L−1) | 95.82 (81.28) | 8.00 |
| NAA (0.25 mg L−1) | 31.24 (33.85) | 1.50 |
| NAA (0.50 mg L−1) | 41.66 (40.14) | 3.50 |
| NAA (0.75 mg L−1) | 62.49 (52.36) | 5.00 |
| NAA (1.00 mg L−1) | 74.99 (60.13) | 6.25 |
Figures in the parenthesis are arcsine transformed values of percentage data.
*Data recorded after 4 weeks of growth.
Fig. 6Rhizogenesis of Petunia hybrid; (a): IBA 1.00 mg L−1; (b): IBA 0.75 mg L−1; NAA 1.00 mg L−1.
Influence of hardening media on ex vitro survival of rooted plantlets.
| Hardening Media | Survival (%) |
|---|---|
| HM1 : Sand | 36.25 (36.93) |
| HM2 : Sand + Perlite (1:1) | 60.00 (50.76) |
| HM3 : Sand + Vermiculite (1:1) | 62.50 (52.5) |
| HM4 : Perlite | 83.75 (66.38) |
| HM5 : Vermiculite | 86.25 (68.41) |
| HM6 : Perlite + Vermiculite (1:1) | 92.50 (74.29) |
| C.D(P≤0.05) |
Figures in the parenthesis are arcsine transformed values of percentage data.
Fig. 7(a): Hardening Stage; (b): Rooted plantlets during hardening.