| Literature DB >> 34220220 |
Renu Gupta1, Ahmed Noureldeen2, Hadeer Darwish3.
Abstract
Phosphate solubilizinpan>g rhizobacteria are considered as an important alternative to increase the availability of accumulated phosphates through solubilization. These increase the growth of plant by enhancing the efficiency of fixing biological nitrogen. This was studied through a pot experiment involving two Phosphate Solubilizing Rhizobacteria (PSRB) isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis along with Tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) on availibity of nutrients, biological composition of soil and yield attributes of rice crop at its growth stages. Experiment was laid in factorial completely randomized design (CRD) comprising of eight treatments replicated thrice with two factors viz. factor 1 with or without TCP (1 g-1soil) and factor 2 with single or combined inoculation of PSRB isolates. Considerable enhancement in available content of potassium (K), phosphorous (P), nitrogen (N) in soil was found with TCP 1 g-1soil (P1) and consortium of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis broth culture at crop growth stages. Highest increase in available N (17.13% and 19.1%), available P (232% and 265%), available K (19.6% and 29.2%) over control were recorded in B3 (consortium of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis broth culture). Similarly, maximum nutrient uptake N (6.4%), P (15.8%) and K (8.9%) were recorded with same treatment. A considerable growth in soil microbial biomass carbon and dehydrogenase activity at crop growth stages was recorded on application of TCP 1 g-1soil (P1) and consortium of PSRB isolates' Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis (B3). Highest increase in microbial biomass carbon (16.4% and 16.5%) and dehydrogenase activity 34.7% and 43.8% over control were recorded in B3 (consortium of PSRB isolates Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis) and was found best among all treatments in terms of yield (63.2%) and yield attributes; number of panicles-1plant (54.8%), number of grains-1panicle (156%) and average panicle length (63.9%).Entities:
Keywords: Phosphate Solublizing Rhizobacteria (PSRB); Rhizosphere; Rice; Tricalcium phosphate (TCP)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220220 PMCID: PMC8241618 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Effect of PSRB inoculation along-with TCP on N, P, K availability at growth stages of rice crop.
| Available Nitrogen (mg kg−1) | Available Phosphorus (mg kg−1) | Available Potassium (mg kg−1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Tillering stage | P.I stage | Harvest Stage | Tillering Stage | P.I stage | Harvest Stage | Tillering Stage | P.I stage | Harvest stage |
| TCP | |||||||||
| SEm(±) | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| CD | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.63 |
| Isolates | |||||||||
| SEm(±) | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.30 |
| CD | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.89 |
| F probability Test | |||||||||
| P(TCP) | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.63 |
| B(PSRB) | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.89 |
| P*B | 1.26 | 1.23 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.04 | 1.24 | 1.21 | 1.26 |
Significant at P < 0.05.
Fig. 1Effect of PSRB inoculation along-with TCP on available nutrients A: Nitogen (N); B: Phosphorus (P) and C: Potassium (K) in soil at growth stages of rice crop.
Effect of PSRB inoculation along with TCP on biological activity in soil at growth stages of rice crop.
| SMBC ((µg−1soil) | DHA Activity µg-TPFg−1soil hr−1) | PHA Activity (µg- PNP g−1soil hr −1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Tillering stage | P.I stage | Harvest stage | Tillering stage | P.I stage | Harvest stage | Tillering stage | P.I stage | Harvest stage |
| TCP | |||||||||
| SEm(±) | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| CD | 1.99 | 2.07 | 1.79 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| Isolates | |||||||||
| SEm(±) | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.30 |
| CD | 2.82 | 2.93 | 2.53 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| F probability Test | |||||||||
| P(TCP) | 1.99 | 2.07 | 1.79 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| B(PSRB) | 2.82 | 2.93 | 2.53 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| P*B | 3.99 | 4.15 | 3.58 | 1.21 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.27 |
Significant at P < 0.05.
Fig. 2Effect of PSRB inoculation along-with TCP on biological activity in soil at growth stages of rice crop. A: DHA Activity mg TPF/g/soil/hr B: PHA Activity p-nitrophenol /g/soil/hr C: SMBC (µg-1 soil).
Effect of PSRB inoculation and TCP on yield attributes and uptake of nutrient in rice crop.
| Treatments | No. of panicles−1plant | No. of grains−1panicle | Average panicle length(cm) | Yield(g−1 pot) | N uptake (g/plot) | P uptake (g/plot) | K uptake (g/plot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCP N uptake (g/plot) | |||||||
| SEm(±) | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| CD | 0.73 | 1.51 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.62 |
| Isolates | |||||||
| SEm(±) | 0.34 | 0.71 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| CD | 1.03 | 2.13 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.87 |
| F probability Test | |||||||
| P(TCP) | 0.73 | 1.51 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.62 |
| B(PSRB) | 1.03 | 2.13 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.87 |
| P*B | NS | 3.02 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 1.11 | 1.17 | 1.23 |
Significant at P < 0.05.
Fig. 3Effect of PSRB inoculation along-with TCP on A: yield attributes and B: nutrient uptake of rice crop.
Effect of PSRB inoculation and TCP on relative efficiency of phosphorus use (%) of rice crop.
| Dry matter (g/plant) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Low Pi | High Pi | REP% |
| P0 (0 g−1 soil) | 0.48 | 0.89 | 53.9% |
| P1 (1 g−1 soil) | 1.42 | 1.79 | 79.3% |
| B0 (Control) | 1.28 | 1.65 | 77.5% |
| B1 (PSRB 1) | 2.73 | 3.30 | 82.7% |
| B2 (PSRB 2) | 3.83 | 4.47 | 85.7% |
| B3 (PSRB 3) | 3.97 | 4.60 | 86.3% |
Coefficient of correlation between available soil nutrients, enzyme activity and plant nutrient uptake.
| SoilAv.N | SoilAv.P | SoilAv.K | Plant N uptake | Plant P uptake | Plant K uptake | SMBC | DHA | PHA | Yield | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil Av.N | 1 | |||||||||
| SoilAv.P | 1.00 | 1 | ||||||||
| SoilAv.K | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1 | |||||||
| Plant N uptake | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1 | ||||||
| Plant P uptake | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1 | |||||
| Plant K uptake | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 | ||||
| SMBC | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1 | |||
| DHA | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1 | ||
| PHA | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1 | |
| Yield | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1 |
DHA = Dehydrogenase activity, SMBC = Soil microbial biomass carbon, PHA = Phosphatase activity.