| Literature DB >> 34220046 |
Zhili Zhao1, Wenyu Zhang2, Yang Liu2, Shuai Li2, Wu Yao2, Xiaohui Sun2, Siyu Li2, Lichao Ma2, Juan Sun2, Qingchuan Yang3, Yongxiang Li4, Guofeng Yang2, Zeng-Yu Wang1,2, Lili Cong2.
Abstract
The legume plant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a widely cultivated perennial forage due to its high protein content, palatability, and strong adaptability to diverse agro-ecological zones. Alfalfa is a self-incompatible cross-pollinated autotetraploid species with tetrasomic inheritance. Therefore, maintaining excellent traits through seed reproduction is a prime challenge in alfalfa. However, the cutting propagation technology could enable consistent multiplication of quality plants that are genetically identical to the parent plant. The current study aimed to develop a simple, cost-effective, reproducible, and efficient hydroponic cutting method to preserve alfalfa plants and for molecular research. In this study, alfalfa landrace 'Wudi' was grown in hydroponics for 30 days and used as source material for cuttings. The top, middle and bottom sections of its stem were used as cuttings. The rooting rate, root length, and stem height of the different stem sections were compared to determine the best segment for alfalfa propagation in four nutrient treatments (HM, HM + 1/500H, HM + 1/1000H and d HM + 1/2000H). After 21 days of culture, the rooting rates of all the three stem types under four cutting nutrient solutions were above 78%. The rooting rate of the middle and bottom parts in HM + 1/1000 H and HM + 1/2000 H nutrient solutions reached more than 93%, with a higher health survey score (> 4.70). In conclusion, this study developed a de novo cutting propagation method that can be used to conserve and propagate germplasm in breeding programs and research. This method is a new report on the cutting propagation of alfalfa by hydroponics, which could supplement the existing cutting propagation methods.Entities:
Keywords: Alfalfa; Cutting propagation; Hydroponic; Rooting rate
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220046 PMCID: PMC8212189 DOI: 10.1007/s12298-021-00995-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Mol Biol Plants ISSN: 0974-0430
Preparation of individual nutrient solutions for the culturing of alfalfa cuttings
| Stock solution | Composition | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| A solution (200 ×) | Ca (NO3)2·4H2O | 189.00 g |
| KNO3 | 121.4 g | |
| B solution (200 ×) | NH4H2PO4 | 23.0 g |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 98.6 g | |
| C solution (1000 ×) | H3BO3 | 2.86 g |
| MnSO4·4H2O | 2.13 g | |
| ZnSO4·7H2O | 0.22 g | |
| CuSO4·5H2O | 0.08 g | |
| (NH4)4Mo7O24·4H2O | 0.02 g | |
| D solution (200 ×) | FeSO4·7H2O | 5.561 g |
| EDTA-Na2·2H2O | 7.485 g | |
| ddH2O | To 1 L |
While preparing the nutrient solution, each solute was dissolved separately and then mixed. The prepared stock solutions should be protected from light during storage. For 1 L 1/2 Hoagland nutrient solution, 2.5 mL stock solution A, B, and D and 0.5 mL solution C were added separately into 1 L distilled water
Fig. 1Schematic overview of alfalfa cutting in the hydroponic system
Preparation of culture medium for alfalfa cuttings
| Composition | Volume |
|---|---|
| A solution | 2.5 mL |
| B solution | 2.5 mL |
| C solution | 0.5 mL |
| D solution | 2.5 mL |
| HB-101 | 2 mL (1/500);1 mL (1/1000);0.5 mL (1/2000) |
| ddH2O | To 1 L |
The preparation protocols for solutions A, B, and C are shown in this table
Fig. 2Response of different stem parts on the propagation of cuttings under four nutrient treatments: A HM nutrient solution. B HM + 1/500H nutrient solution. C HM + 1/1000H nutrient solution. D HM + 1/2000H nutrient solution
Effect of different stem parts on cutting propagation
| Stem part for cutting | Nutrient solution | Rooting rate (%) | Root length (cm) | Stem height (cm) | Health survey score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | HM | 83.33 ± 1.67a | 9.99 ± 0.55a | 9.51 ± 0.47b | 3.44 ± 0.14b |
| Middle | HM | 86.67 ± 6.01a | 13.37 ± 2.13a | 14.61 ± 3.29ab | 3.74 ± 0.13b |
| Bottom | HM | 91.67 ± 1.67a | 9.33 ± 0.59a | 18.74 ± 1.48a | 4.43 ± 0.12a |
| Top | HM + 1/500 H | 83.33 ± 1.67a | 6.86 ± 0.50b | 8.36 ± 0.57b | 2.92 ± 0.14c |
| Middle | HM + 1/500 H | 93.33 ± 1.67a | 7.80 ± 0.17ab | 15.87 ± 2.53a | 3.36 ± 0.09b |
| Bottom | HM + 1/500 H | 93.33 ± 4.41a | 8.58 ± 0.20a | 19.18 ± 1.0a | 4.60 ± 0.13a |
| Top | HM + 1/1000 H | 78.33 ± 6.01b | 7.37 ± 0.25b | 8.47 ± 0.68c | 3.34 ± 0.11b |
| Middle | HM + 1/1000 H | 93.33 ± 3.33a | 8.93 ± 0.06b | 15.09 ± 1.62b | 4.72 ± 0.09a |
| Bottom | HM + 1/1000 H | 98.33 ± 1.67a | 12.72 ± 1.70a | 19.45 ± 0.27a | 4.88 ± 0.04a |
| Top | HM + 1/2000 H | 90.00 ± 0.00b | 7.85 ± 0.79b | 10.09 ± 1.30b | 3.10 ± 0.16b |
| Middle | HM + 1/2000 H | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 9.00 ± 1.14ab | 16.70 ± 2.69ab | 4.86 ± 0.05a |
| Bottom | HM + 1/2000 H | 98.33 ± 1.67a | 10.94 ± 0.50a | 20.95 ± 2.39a | 4.76 ± 0.09a |
The data is shown as the mean ± SE (n = 3), and different letters at the top of each column indicate significant differences under the same nutrient solution (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Rooting rates, root lengths, and stem heights of the top stem segment obtained in the four nutrient treatments: A cuttings grown in the four nutrient treatments. B Rooted plants in the four nutrient treatments. C Rooting rate. D Root length. E Stem height
Fig. 4Rooting rates, root lengths, and stem heights for the middle stem segment under the four nutrient treatments: A cuttings grown in the four nutrient treatments. B Rooted plants in the four nutrient treatments. C Rooting rate. D Root length. E Stem height
Fig. 5Rooting rates, root lengths, and stem heights for the lower stem segment grown under the four cutting nutrient treatments: A cuttings grown in four nutrient treatments. B Rooted plants in the four nutrient treatments. C Rooting rate. D Root length. E Stem height