| Literature DB >> 34219879 |
Ivan Blažeković1, Matija Romić1, Marija Bosak Butković1, Ines Šiško Markoš1, Vedrana Gladić Nenadić1, Valentina Vidranski1, Petra Petranović Ovčariček1, Dražena Krilić1, Tea Varjačić1, Josip Staničić1, Roko Granić1, Marija Punda1, Ivan Mihaljević1, Tomislav Jukić1, Maja Franceschi1.
Abstract
The worldwide incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has increased in recent decades, likely due to frequent use of cervical ultrasonography (US) and US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA)., US is performed during follow-up after thyroidectomy, and US-guided FNA with cytology is used if suspicious cervical lymph nodes (LN) or thyroid bed masses are detected. Knowing that serum anti-Tg antibodies (sTgAb) affect the use of serum Tg (sTg) as a tumor marker, the aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of Tg determination in needle aspirates (FNA-Tg) in presence of sTgAb. This retrospective study included 149 patients with DTC and 159 aspirations of suspicious LN and thyroid bed masses. As expected, there was a negative correlation between sTg and sTgAb levels (p<0.05), while FNA-Tg levels had a positive correlation with FNA-TgAb levels (p<0.05). Furthermore, we found a positive correlation between sTg and FNA-Tg levels (p<0.05), but not between sTgAb and FNA-TgAb or sTgAb and FNA-Tg. In conclusion, these results show that FNA-Tg values were not affected by sTgAb and that FNA-Tg measurement were highly effective in detecting cervical DTC metastases. However, combined use with cytology is suggested for neck evaluation because cytology could reveal metastases from other tumor sites.Entities:
Keywords: FNA anti-Tg antibodies (FNA-TgAb); differentiated thyroid carcinoma; fine needle aspiration (FNA); neck ultrasonography; serum anti-Tg antibodies (sTg-Ab); serum thyroglobulin (sTg); thyroglobulin (Tg) in FNA (FNA-Tg)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34219879 PMCID: PMC8212602 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.s1.01
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Clin Croat ISSN: 0353-9466 Impact factor: 0.780
Figure 1The patients were divided into two groups according to their sTgAb (IU/mL) levels.
Descriptive statistics
| sTgAb positive | sTgAb negative | |
|---|---|---|
| Patients/suspicious nodes | 31/34 | 118/125 |
| Age-median (years) | 43 (26-86) | 51 (12-85) |
| s-Tg-median (ng/mL) | 0.14 | 0.79 |
| FNA-Tg-median (ng/mL) | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| FNA-TgAb-median (IU/mL) | 24.78 | 22.97 |
| FNA-Tg-positive patients /nodes | 11/13 | 32/33 |
| Cytology (patients /nodes) | 10/13 | 21/22 |
Figure 2Correlation between FNA TgAb (IU/mL) and FNA Tg (ng/mL).