| Literature DB >> 34218790 |
Chunna Jin1,2, Jonathan Weber1, Harsimar Singh1, Kathleen Gliganic1, J Jane Cao3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain are independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, the relationship between tissue properties and strain indices as well as their collective impact on outcomes are yet to be fully elucidated. We aim to investigate the relationship between LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) with extracellular volume (ECV) and their collective impact.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiomyopathy; Extracellular volume; Heart failure; Strain
Year: 2021 PMID: 34218790 PMCID: PMC8256505 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00776-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Examples of native T1, post-contrast T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) in a normal control (A) and in a patient (B) and the corresponding profiles of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains. A Upper panel shows a normal subject with normal global native T1 (975 ms), post-contrast T1 (472 ms), and ECV (26.3%); Bottom panel shows the same normal subject with normal global longitudinal strain (GLS) (− 17.4%), global circumferential strain (GCS) (− 16.9%), and global radial strain (GRS) (28.4%). B Upper panel shows a patient with increased global native T1 (1120 ms), increased ECV (44.0%), and preserved global post-contrast T1 (500 ms). Bottom panel shows the same patient with reduced GLS (− 6.8%), reduced GCS (− 12.7%), and relatively preserved GRS (18.5%)
Baseline characteristics of study population
| Diseased patients (N = 259) | Normal controls (N = 21) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54 (13) | 44 (15) | 0.001 |
| Male | 196 (76) | 13 (62) | 0.163 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 2.06 (0.24) | 1.86 (0.21) | < 0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 29.4 (5.1) | 24.9 (3.2) | < 0.001 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 68 (13) | 69 (13) | 0.711 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 131 (190 | 119 (13) | 0.019 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 75 (11) | 71 (12) | 0.209 |
| Smoking history | 91 (36) | 6 (32) | 0.718 |
| History of heart failure | 84 (33) | 0 (0) | 0.003 |
| History of coronary artery disease | 48 (19) | 0 (0) | 0.038 |
| Hypertension | 124 (49) | 0 (0) | < 0.001 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 124 (49) | 0 (0) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | 44 (17) | 0 (0) | 0.047 |
| LV end diastolic volume (ml/m2) | 84 (24) | 75 (13) | 0.090 |
| LV end systolic volume (ml/m2) | 43 (21) | 33 (7) | 0.043 |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 51 (11) | 56 (4) | 0.042 |
| LV ejection fraction < 50% | 93 (36) | 0 (0) | < 0.001 |
| LV mass (g/m2) | 61 (15) | 51 (10) | 0.004 |
| RV ejection fraction (%) | 53 (9) | 55 (4) | 0.283 |
| Ischemic cardiomyopathy | 29 (11) | 0 (0) | |
| Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | 30 (12) | 0 (0) | |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy | 81 (31) | 0 (0) | |
| Infiltrative cardiomyopathy | 31 (12) | 0 (0) | |
| Myocarditis | 17 (7) | 0 (0) | |
| Valvular disease | 28 (11) | 0 (0) | |
| Other myocardial diseasea | 43 (17) | 0 (0) | |
| No significant findings | 0 (0) | 21 (100) | |
| Late gadolinium enhancement | 125 (48) | 0 | < 0.001 |
| Native T1 (ms) | 990 (42) | 981 (28) | 0.356 |
| Post-contrast T1 (ms) | 482 (39) | 498 (31) | 0.087 |
| Extracellular volume (%) | 27.7 (5.1) | 25.9 (2.6) | 0.108 |
| Global longitudinal strain (%) | − 10.5 (3.5) | − 13.5 (1.9) | < 0.001 |
| Global circumferential strain (%) | − 12.9 (4.1) | − 16.2 (2.4) | < 0.001 |
| Global radial strain (%) | 19.6 (8.3) | 25.9 (5.8) | < 0.001 |
Presented as mean (standard deviation) or n (%)
LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle
aOther myocardial disease includes regional or global left ventricular hypertrophy, non-infarct pattern of late gadolinium enhancement, and significant left ventricular or left atrial dilation
Fig. 2Relationships between T1 mapping parameters and global strains in all comers. The average strains and 95% confidence intervals correspond to T1 mapping parameters per standard deviation (SD) change above and below the normal mean (cut points in parenthesis). The dose–response change was tested by Jonckheere–Terpstra test for linear trend with all p < 0.05
Fig. 3Relationships between T1 mapping parameters and global strains in a subgroup of patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (N = 81). The average strains and 95% confidence intervals correspond to T1 mapping parameters per standard deviation (SD) change above and below the normal mean (cut points in parenthesis)
Fig. 4Risk of adverse clinical outcomes associated with lower global strains and higher ECV. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrate that event-free survival is reduced with lower global strains based on the cut off (− 11.0%) for GLS (A), − 11.4% for GCS (B), and 15.7% for GRS (C); event-free survival is worse with increased ECV (cut off 28.3%) and reduced GLS (D), GCS (E), and GRS (F) using thresholds above, respectively
Cox proportional hazards of strain and tissue properties associated with a composite outcome of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality
| Primary parameter | HR | LL | UL | HRADJa | LL | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS ≥ − 11.0% | 2.49 | 1.27 | 4.89 | 2.44 | 1.18 | 5.06 | ||
| GCS ≥ − 11.4% | 2.38 | 1.29 | 4.40 | 2.13 | 1.09 | 4.16 | ||
| GRS ≤ 15.7% | 2.34 | 1.26 | 4.33 | 2.23 | 1.16 | 4.27 | ||
| ECV ≥ 28.3% | 3.21 | 1.71 | 6.01 | 3.18 | 1.52 | 6.66 | ||
| Native T1 ≥ 992 ms | 1.62 | 0.88 | 2.99 | 1.51 | 0.78 | 2.94 | ||
| Post-contrast T1 < 470 ms | 2.25 | 1.21 | 4.21 | 2.02 | 1.01 | 4.03 | ||
| GLS < − 11.0%, ECV < 28.3% | 1.00 | (Reference) | 1.00 | (Reference) | ||||
| GLS ≥ − 11.0%, ECV < 28.3% | 2.41 | 0.89 | 6.52 | 2.24 | 0.82 | 6.12 | ||
| GLS < − 11.0%, ECV ≥ 28.3% | 3.65 | 1.18 | 11.32 | 3.05 | 0.87 | 10.64 | ||
| GLS ≥ − 11.0%, ECV ≥ 28.3% | 6.34 | 2.51 | 16.00 | 6.01 | 2.19 | 16.53 | ||
CI confidence interval, GLS global longitudinal strain, GCS global circumferential strain, GRS global radial strain, ECV extracellular volume, HR adjusted hazard ratio
aAdjusted for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and infarct pattern on late gadolinium enhancement imaging